
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Time to go on record.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:48 am to BrodyDad
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:48 am to BrodyDad
No. Historically, the President's party losses in the midterms.
The House is close enough for that trend alone to make the difference.
Dems take the House, even without cheating...doesn't mean they WON'T cheat.
Republicans keep the Senate.
The House is close enough for that trend alone to make the difference.
Dems take the House, even without cheating...doesn't mean they WON'T cheat.
Republicans keep the Senate.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:50 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Correct. Dems cannot take control of both houses of Congress without catastrophic election fraud pathways being exploited successfully.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:51 am to BrodyDad
quote:
The only way the Dems take over 1 or both houses of Congress after the midterms is through widespread voter/election fraud. There is no legitimate way they can do so otherwise.
Yes.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 11:56 am to davyjones
quote:
The left has done nothing more than doubled down on all the same rhetoric and sowing of division and discord that got them blasted in the last election. What have they changed, either action or agenda wise, and/or rhetoric wise?
I agree with you. Unfortunately, if people are unhappy with things they blame that on the party in power.
Problem isn't that Dems are a good choice. Problem is apathy from Republican voters.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:02 pm to BrodyDad
quote:
BrodyDad
how's brody? what he up to these days?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:03 pm to BrodyDad
Not no but hell no.
Historically the mid term elections show losses for the majority party in situations like this. Plus look at the polls.
The House certainly will switch to D, and there's a pretty fair chance the Senate will switch as well.
As to anyone claiming voter fraud, those who make an allegation bear the burden of proving it. Ask them for the evidence.
Historically the mid term elections show losses for the majority party in situations like this. Plus look at the polls.
The House certainly will switch to D, and there's a pretty fair chance the Senate will switch as well.
As to anyone claiming voter fraud, those who make an allegation bear the burden of proving it. Ask them for the evidence.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:13 pm to Fat Bastard
how's brody? what he up to these days?
You know how he rolls. Same ol'. He said to tell your mama and them hey.
You know how he rolls. Same ol'. He said to tell your mama and them hey.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:14 pm to BrodyDad
No.
There is obvious voter fraud in the primary process of both parties so you're already starting off 99% of the time with an Israel approved puppet.
The US government is bankrupt and has been long taken over by the unelected National Security State.
Under estimating the amount of disappointment from the non Bush/Romney/Rubio rightwing/libertarian vote is woefully inept political analysis.
Coupled with the TDS of the left, this disastrous Israel First war, covering up of the Israeli/CIA/MI5 occult / blackmail ring that Epstein was entangled in will go down as the biggest reason for the the Democrats defeating Repubs in November.
It's a Uniparty, and we're not in it.
Jesus Christ is my lord and savior.
There is obvious voter fraud in the primary process of both parties so you're already starting off 99% of the time with an Israel approved puppet.
The US government is bankrupt and has been long taken over by the unelected National Security State.
Under estimating the amount of disappointment from the non Bush/Romney/Rubio rightwing/libertarian vote is woefully inept political analysis.
Coupled with the TDS of the left, this disastrous Israel First war, covering up of the Israeli/CIA/MI5 occult / blackmail ring that Epstein was entangled in will go down as the biggest reason for the the Democrats defeating Repubs in November.
It's a Uniparty, and we're not in it.
Jesus Christ is my lord and savior.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:16 pm to BrodyDad
My guess is Dems end up with 220-225 House seats and 48-49 Senate seats. Main thing is we gotta hold the Senate and then the 2030 census, along with uncucking UT/IN/SC, should make the House much easier for the GOP to hold in the 2030's.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:28 pm to BrodyDad
I think the Repubs lose both.
...and they should.
...and they should.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:35 pm to BrodyDad
The Republicans will probably lose the House and without cheating. I don't know about the Senate.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:36 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
My guess is Dems end up with 220-225 House seats
435 total seats.
quote:
Main thing is we gotta hold the Senate and then the 2030 census, along with uncucking UT/IN/SC, should make the House much easier for the GOP to hold in the 2030's.
If the dems take the house in November, how does the pubs hold in 2030 or, did you mean the senate?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:36 pm to BrodyDad
Yes
Not getting the SAVE Act passed is treasonous and John Thune needs to be treated as such.
Not getting the SAVE Act passed is treasonous and John Thune needs to be treated as such.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:43 pm to FATBOY TIGER
Yeah, there are 438 House seats. You need 218 for a majority. I'm saying the Dems will probably have 220-225 seats, so a 2 to 7 seat majority.
I was just saying that the key is to hold the Senate this cycle as those seats are for six years. Having a President Vance in '28 with a Democratic Senate would suck big time.
We can regain the House in '28 or '30, then once we retake the House it should be much easier to maintain control in the 2030's given redistricting from the new census.
I was just saying that the key is to hold the Senate this cycle as those seats are for six years. Having a President Vance in '28 with a Democratic Senate would suck big time.
We can regain the House in '28 or '30, then once we retake the House it should be much easier to maintain control in the 2030's given redistricting from the new census.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:44 pm to BrodyDad
Yes
The republicans want it that way so that they don't have to make excuses about why they won't pass anything on Trump's agenda. Congress does not serve the people of the United States and this was always the plan when they allowed Trump to take office. Skate for a couple of years until they lose the House.
The republicans want it that way so that they don't have to make excuses about why they won't pass anything on Trump's agenda. Congress does not serve the people of the United States and this was always the plan when they allowed Trump to take office. Skate for a couple of years until they lose the House.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 12:45 pm to boosiebadazz
It is amazing how some people cannot be objective in the least.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 1:03 pm to Jake88
My four year old tells his sister she’s cheating every time she beats him at something.
It’s literal toddler logic from the smartest guy in the room.
It’s literal toddler logic from the smartest guy in the room.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 1:42 pm to BrodyDad
If the crybaby, no chest RINOs don’t vote then the bad guys won’t have to cheat because the “good guy” didn’t want to win. They stayed home and pouted like a little girl.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 2:00 pm to 4LSU2
quote:
Bloodbath by the currently worthless GOP. Thune will be replaced.
The problem is, what is the alternative solution...give me a "worthless, feckless" bunch in Congress ANY day of the week vs a harmful and hateful bunch like the alternative will be. ZERO is much preferrable to NEGATIVE.

Popular
Back to top


0









