- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:55 pm to LegendInMyMind
He's talking about the others. The ones who dont bother to ask anything or even doubt Gates is doing it.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:22 pm to prouddawg
quote:
quote: Bill Gates
I really wish a small group of patriotic former special operations guys would be financed to ….. do something
You know……..accidents DO happen all the time.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:27 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
From me? Or the topic of the OP? Because what I said is true, but you carry on.
Topic of the OP.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 8:36 pm to Warrior Court
If you weren’t questioning wtf is up with the OP before… you have to be questioning now.
Clearly being paid by someone…
Clearly being paid by someone…
Posted on 5/21/26 at 3:43 pm to Warrior Court
quote:
A scientist suggested using bioengineered ticks to make people allergic to meat and save the planet, while Bill Gates is funding a company that is genetically modifying ticks.
Now, many are connecting the two.
Gates has pushed hard for slashing meat eating in wealthy nations by switching to fake synthetic beef, while a separate bioethicist floated engineering human meat intolerance as a climate fix.
However, experts say claims tying this directly to Gates releasing genetically modified ticks, are unproven conspiracy theories, even though real Alpha-gal (AGS) cases from Lone Star tick bites have exploded in the US.
Matthew Lau, a New York University bioethicist is the one who made the comments:
“We can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat to certain kinds of bovine proteins. And there's actually analogs of this in life. There’s this thing called the Lone Star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat, I can sort of describe the mechanism. So, that's something that we can do through human engineering.”
His idea appeared in academic circles around 2012, and was talked about publicly in 2016.
Then in 2021, Gates said rich countries should move to 100% synthetic beef to cut methane emissions from cattle, he said:
“I do think all rich countries should move to 100% synthetic beef. You can get used to the taste difference eventually. That green premium is modest enough that you can sort of change the behavior of people or use regulation to totally shift the demand.”
He has invested in companies like Impossible Foods, Beyond Meat, and Upside Foods, but he said poorer countries can keep traditional livestock. 450,000 Americans have Alpha-gal syndrome caused by tick bites.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has provided multiple grants to support research on genetically engineered cattle ticks, specifically the Asian blue tick, to control populations that harm livestock, which is what they say it does.
The claim is that cattle ticks, specifically the Asian food tick, can cause Alpha-gal syndrome If they bite.
However, AGS is primarily associated with bites from the Lone Star tick in the U.S and certain other tick species, while Asian blue ticks primarily feed on cattle, there is evidence that they can cause AGS in humans if bit, but no definitive studies have been published connecting the two.
In 2021, the Gates Foundation awarded 1.28 million dollars to a UK-based biotech firm for a 14-month study to adapt the friendly genetic technology used on mosquitoes and crop pests for the Asian blue tick. In 2023, an additional 4.8 million dollar grant was given to the company to advance development.
The Gates Foundation has also funded a 2015 meeting on cattle tick vaccines and over 70 million dollars in grants to another company for tick-borne disease research in Africa.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 4:32 pm to Jake88
Wow!!! And I thought Louisiana had the biggest clown in Congress.
But it turns out Higgins is in at least second place , if not third with Burchett and Ogles in Tennessee.
Clay you need to step up your game
But it turns out Higgins is in at least second place , if not third with Burchett and Ogles in Tennessee.
Clay you need to step up your game
Posted on 5/21/26 at 5:45 pm to Ailsa
Permethrin sales about to go through the roof. Just added another 5 cans to my cart.
...it'll be fine until they engineer and distribute a batch of resistant ticks.
As an avid outdoorsman that spends half of my waking hours in the woods and near the water, I remind you all to NEVER go out without your DEET.
...it'll be fine until they engineer and distribute a batch of resistant ticks.
As an avid outdoorsman that spends half of my waking hours in the woods and near the water, I remind you all to NEVER go out without your DEET.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 5:49 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Permethrin sales about to go through the roof. Just added another 5 cans to my cart.
...it'll be fine until they engineer and distribute a batch of resistant ticks.
As an avid outdoorsman that spends half of my waking hours in the woods and near the water, I remind you all to NEVER go out without your DEET.
I thought DEET was toxic.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 6:50 pm to Ailsa
quote:
thought DEET was toxic.
Pick your poison. DEET, or risk Lyme, Alpha Gal, etc..
I spray the crap out of my boots and clothes (mainly pants) with DEET (minimum 40% to be effective) and try to avoid skin contact as much as possible. On my arms, neck, etc., I use non-toxic, natural homemade repellents that are more effective for mosquitoes, but the majority of ticks latch on to your clothes (or skin) below the waist, hence that being the focused area for DEET application.
I have a family member with Lyme and a close friend with Alpha Gal. I've weighed the pros and cons, and believe cautious use of DEET to be the far better option.
It's just my opinion and not in any way medical advice. Everyone should make their own decisions. But it works for Mrs. Axe and I, and we're in the heart of some of the thickest tick country in the US.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 6:59 pm to Ailsa
This shite is crazy, my friend had a tarp outside and moved it today and there a bunch of ticks on it, yesterday a girl told me a tick got on her when she was sitting on her porch. She didn’t even walk in the yard.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 7:23 pm to Ailsa
With several of his claims, he is either an idiot or playing to idiots.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 7:26 pm to Ailsa
This is Bond villain level evil, and there needs to be real consequences.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 7:26 pm to Ailsa
Muh Bill Gates Soros deep state
Posted on 5/21/26 at 7:39 pm to Jake88
I like how the left doing something like this is immediately pushed off as being a radical conspiracy theory. They have mentioned their intentions to use ticks to force lifestyle choices we would otherwise not make.
In a provocative 2025 paper titled “Beneficial Bloodsucking,” bioethicists Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth argued that the lone star tick’s ability to trigger alpha-gal syndrome (AGS)—a potentially severe, delayed allergy to red meat—could serve as a “moral bioenhancer” to reduce meat consumption.
Observing the tick’s natural northward spread and rising cases of the incurable condition (which forces sufferers to avoid beef, pork, lamb, and often dairy), they contended that deliberately encouraging or even engineering the spread of AGS might be ethically obligatory. This would align human behavior with animal welfare, environmental, and climate goals without direct coercion, as the allergy only activates upon eating red meat. The idea, framed as a thought experiment exploring bioethical convergence arguments, ignited widespread backlash for violating bodily autonomy, risking broader tick-borne diseases, and treating a debilitating condition as a public-health tool. While no engineered ticks were released, the lone star tick continues expanding on its own, quietly turning more people into reluctant vegetarians through nature’s unintended experiment.
In a provocative 2025 paper titled “Beneficial Bloodsucking,” bioethicists Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth argued that the lone star tick’s ability to trigger alpha-gal syndrome (AGS)—a potentially severe, delayed allergy to red meat—could serve as a “moral bioenhancer” to reduce meat consumption.
Observing the tick’s natural northward spread and rising cases of the incurable condition (which forces sufferers to avoid beef, pork, lamb, and often dairy), they contended that deliberately encouraging or even engineering the spread of AGS might be ethically obligatory. This would align human behavior with animal welfare, environmental, and climate goals without direct coercion, as the allergy only activates upon eating red meat. The idea, framed as a thought experiment exploring bioethical convergence arguments, ignited widespread backlash for violating bodily autonomy, risking broader tick-borne diseases, and treating a debilitating condition as a public-health tool. While no engineered ticks were released, the lone star tick continues expanding on its own, quietly turning more people into reluctant vegetarians through nature’s unintended experiment.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 8:29 pm to Ailsa
quote:
The Gates Foundation funded a biotech firm called Oxitec for research on genetically modifying cattle ticks
Farmers claim to be funding “boxes of ticks”on their properties
Lyme disease cases are skyrocketed right at the time when a Lyme disease vaccine is actively in the works
So without the ticks, they can’t sell their vaccines
So Bill Gates is so greedy he would murder people to make money. At the same time he is giving away his fortune. He is now worth about $105 million. He has donated over $60 billion so far and has pledged to give away a hell of a lot more.
Maybe Bill Gates has a nefarious motivation and is up to evil deeds, but making money can’t be the motivation.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 8:53 pm to jnethe1
quote:
While no engineered ticks were released
quote:Well, there you go. Bill Gates isn't releasing these things. Just because some jerk-off ethicists suggest it might be acceptable doesnt mean they're out there doing it.
nature’s unintended experiment
Posted on 5/21/26 at 8:54 pm to Penrod
quote:And there is no way he knows where it's all going such that he is purposely engaged in releasing ticks.
He has donated over $60 billion so far and has pledged to give away a hell of a lot more
Posted on 5/21/26 at 9:21 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
What if I told you the species of tick they use don't threaten humans and don't feed on humans, and that the species has never been known or proven to carry or spread Lyme disease?
What if I told you things "jump" and "mutate"?
What if I told you absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence?
What if I told you Bill Gates is a sick man and maybe you shouldn't believe everything he says?
Posted on 5/21/26 at 9:21 pm to Jake88
quote:
doesnt mean they're out there doing it.
.... yet
Popular
Back to top


0









