- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tim Burchett: Bill Gates is behind the massive increase in ticks
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:43 pm to TigerDoc
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:43 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
I was thinking more about standards for us as citizens trying to figure out what’s true in that murky middle ground between “totally impossible” and “definitely proven”, especially in confusing and misleading digital environments like OP arises in.
Proven patterns of statements and actions.
So far as BG goes, there's plenty to consider.
That fella that did a thing on the idea of imposing Alpha-gal as a moral imperative... afaik, he was spitballing and thus not as "threatening".
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:43 pm to TigerDoc
AI reply:
Yes, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has funded Oxitec, a biotechnology company, to develop genetically modified cattle ticks. This initiative focuses on creating a self-limiting tick to sustainably control the tropical cattle tick, known scientifically as Rhipicephalus microplus.
Purpose of the Research
The primary goals of this research include:
Sustainable Control: Developing a method to manage cattle tick populations without relying on chemical pesticides.
Public Health Impact: Addressing the rising cases of red meat allergies in the U.S., which are linked to alpha-gal syndrome, a condition associated with tick bites.
Oxitec's Approach
Oxitec's technology involves creating genetically modified ticks that limit the survival of their offspring, thereby reducing the overall population. This method is part of a broader strategy to enhance agricultural practices and improve livestock health.
This partnership highlights the Gates Foundation's commitment to innovative solutions in global health and agriculture.
Yes, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has funded Oxitec, a biotechnology company, to develop genetically modified cattle ticks. This initiative focuses on creating a self-limiting tick to sustainably control the tropical cattle tick, known scientifically as Rhipicephalus microplus.
Purpose of the Research
The primary goals of this research include:
Sustainable Control: Developing a method to manage cattle tick populations without relying on chemical pesticides.
Public Health Impact: Addressing the rising cases of red meat allergies in the U.S., which are linked to alpha-gal syndrome, a condition associated with tick bites.
Oxitec's Approach
Oxitec's technology involves creating genetically modified ticks that limit the survival of their offspring, thereby reducing the overall population. This method is part of a broader strategy to enhance agricultural practices and improve livestock health.
This partnership highlights the Gates Foundation's commitment to innovative solutions in global health and agriculture.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:45 pm to LegendInMyMind
This actually helps get at my question to Sally and it actually seems like a pretty reasonable example of how this stuff should work. People notice something weird, concerns get raised, somebody looks into it seriously, evidence either accumulates or it doesn’t. Feels healthier than either “believe everything instantly” or “mock anyone who asks questions.”
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:46 pm to Jake88
quote:
So, I have no evidence you aren't into bestiality. I know you had a dog. I know some people have no ethical qualms about having sex with dogs. So you are likely into bestiality if we are using similar logic to what's been posted in this thread.
Not quite.
I've never evinced ANY perverted predilections.
Your comparison is null.
Upthread I listed evidence to consider in determining if the OP claim was even possible.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:50 pm to SallysHuman
quote:But absence of evidence of predilections isn't evidence of absence. We will keep our eye on you.
I've never evinced ANY perverted predilections.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:50 pm to LLeD
Thanks for that. It goes to show that there's a LOT of info out there and can even get overwhelming. Page 1 is kind of a potpourri of different things that may or may not belong together - Lyme disease being real and awful, alpha-gal syndrome being real, biotech firms researching ticks, Gates funding weird biotech stuff, distrust of pharma companies, DARPA existing and then “therefore they’re secretly dropping millions of ticks from planes”
Some of those claims are established, some speculative, and some are just vibes holding hands with each other. Not saying people shouldn’t ask questions, but these kinds of threads tend to blend “possible,” “researched”, “discussed”, and “proven to be happening” into one giant stew.
Some of those claims are established, some speculative, and some are just vibes holding hands with each other. Not saying people shouldn’t ask questions, but these kinds of threads tend to blend “possible,” “researched”, “discussed”, and “proven to be happening” into one giant stew.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:51 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
This is Bond villain level evil, and there needs to be real consequences
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:53 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
This actually helps get at my question to Sally and it actually seems like a pretty reasonable example of how this stuff should work. People notice something weird, concerns get raised, somebody looks into it seriously, evidence either accumulates or it doesn’t. Feels healthier than either “believe everything instantly” or “mock anyone who asks questions.”
These things often start with a grain of truth. Oxitec does experiment with/do research on ticks. Gates has funded that research. That's the truth.
The other part of the truth is that Oxitec's work has been with the Asian Blue Tick, Rhipicephalus microplus, which is a cattle tick that rarely bites humans and doesn't carry nor is known to transmit any of the diseases of concern talked about in this thread. That species is, however, one of the most significant threats to cattle out of all of the cattle tick species, hence the research.
This post was edited on 5/21/26 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 5/21/26 at 10:56 pm to SallysHuman
I actually think “proven patterns of statements/actions” is probably unavoidable as a heuristic in low-trust environments such as we live in. The tricky part IMO is figuring out when pattern recognition is helping us detect real risks versus when it starts making almost any feared scenario feel self-evidently plausible once enough disliked actors are attached to it.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 11:01 pm to LegendInMyMind
That’s kinda the internet in a nutshell now. Real headline + missing context + implied motive + everybody mentally fills in the last 20%.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 11:07 pm to Jake88
quote:
We will keep our eye on you.
Well... that sounds funny.
Anywho... this isn't an argument I feel the need to "win". I'm comfortable in my observations of past actions and skepticism regarding future action.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 11:09 pm to TigerDoc
That's precisely the goal, as you said, to mix everything into one cocktail.
(to constantly intimidating people).
I am not Gates fan at all, but noticed that this lady often posts "news" directly from the disgusting, anti-Western disinformation channel - rt.
LINK
(to constantly intimidating people).
I am not Gates fan at all, but noticed that this lady often posts "news" directly from the disgusting, anti-Western disinformation channel - rt.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/21/26 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 5/21/26 at 11:13 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
The tricky part IMO is figuring out when pattern recognition is helping us detect real risks versus when it starts making almost any feared scenario feel self-evidently plausible once enough disliked actors are attached to it.
It's not that deep.
I can't do a thing about dimming, mosquitoes, or ticks.
All I have is my observation of a man obsessed with reordering nature to his own ideals- be they solar, environmental, or biological. Will he prevail? Will he not? I cannot affect that. But, I do notice. That is all I have.
I am not fearful, I do not share re: re: re: facebook posts... I'm just here, talking lightly about it. Either way- I have a God, BG will neither save nor slay me. It's all good.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 11:15 pm to LegendInMyMind
You don't know what you are talking about.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 11:15 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
but these kinds of threads tend to blend “possible,” “researched”, “discussed”, and “proven to be happening” into one giant stew.
By the time "proven to be happening" occurs... it is often too late to reverse course.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 11:20 pm to SallysHuman
I respect that. It's a way of staying morally and existentially oriented.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 3:11 am to Jake88
frickin serious? For creating a national health emergency!
Again.
Again.
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 3:12 am
Posted on 5/22/26 at 6:21 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Which ones?
frickin serious? For creating a national health emergency!
Again
Posted on 5/22/26 at 6:31 am to Jake88
First, his part and developing and spreading Covid and now Lyme disease.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 7:02 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:How did he develop covid and spread it? Dont give me bullshite sites and sources that link his donation of money to medical research that then leap to his then "developing covid." Dont link sites that say because money went to tick research of an Asian tick that harms cattle to his spreading Lyme disease.
First, his part and developing and spreading Covid and now Lyme disease
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 7:12 am
Popular
Back to top



1




