- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:00 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Right? Right???
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:02 pm to Rebel
quote:
yea, they will say this staged and use her interview with Failla as proof.
The epstein files remain unharmed nonetheless.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:05 pm to AlterEd
Here lately I've started believing that time travel is real and we are getting near the end of a cycle which will be reset soon.
Religion is made up and people keep using time travel to reset the world. The rapture and the antichrist is what they use to explain it when people start resetting and disappearing.
Deja vu is when you have experienced something that happened the exact way in one of the previous cycles
They are trying to create a perfect world, but the human element comes into play every time and ruins things, but they get further every time.
Religion is made up and people keep using time travel to reset the world. The rapture and the antichrist is what they use to explain it when people start resetting and disappearing.
Deja vu is when you have experienced something that happened the exact way in one of the previous cycles
They are trying to create a perfect world, but the human element comes into play every time and ruins things, but they get further every time.
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:10 pm to crimsoncoded94
quote:
Here lately I've started believing that time travel is real
I feel like there is a strong possibility that time travel is real and travelers are among us simply for the fact that physicists say it is possible. I figure that if it's possible, it's just a matter of time before it's figured out and if it is figured out at some point in the future, we are dealing with them now.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:11 pm to AlterEd
Fair question - let me try to be clearer. OP and Boosie's reply kind of do a similar kind of move structurally:
-start with something real but incomplete
-leave the key connection unstated
-and let readers fill in a likely explanation
The tweet you posted invites an inference, his quote invites another, but the pattern in both seems to be doing a lot of work in threads like this.
-start with something real but incomplete
-leave the key connection unstated
-and let readers fill in a likely explanation
The tweet you posted invites an inference, his quote invites another, but the pattern in both seems to be doing a lot of work in threads like this.
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:18 pm to AlterEd
Notice how a lot of movies lately are putting it right in our faces. To make the next step they have to be able to come out that its real without freaking people out and causing an apocalypse.
If it came out that time travel was real right now people would literally flip their shite and the world would collapse.
Every countries economy would fold and governments would lose control of everything. This is probably what happens in every cycle and they are trying to determine how to prevent that from happening and move to the next wave.
We arent far from living in a world where AI and robots basically run everything.
If it came out that time travel was real right now people would literally flip their shite and the world would collapse.
Every countries economy would fold and governments would lose control of everything. This is probably what happens in every cycle and they are trying to determine how to prevent that from happening and move to the next wave.
We arent far from living in a world where AI and robots basically run everything.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:20 pm to AlterEd
I mean there are probably thousands of Cole Allen's out there.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:23 pm to Contra
quote:
I mean there are probably thousands of Cole Allen's out there
I've already given y'all the numbers on it.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:26 pm to Contra
I dont care if there 20 billion cole Allen's.
No one makes a Twitter account, post a singular name, then never logs in again to said Twitter account.
It doesnt even make sense.
Its either a sleeper cell or time travel
No one makes a Twitter account, post a singular name, then never logs in again to said Twitter account.
It doesnt even make sense.
Its either a sleeper cell or time travel
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:34 pm to crimsoncoded94
Ask an AI to calculate the odds that a person would open an X account, only make one tweet ever, which is a name that happens to match the name of someone who tries to kill the POTUS 3 years later. The answer is 1 in 10^6 or up to 1 in 10^8+.
This isn't some account who posted a vague hint. The account's only action ever was to post the exact name of someone who tried to assassinate the POTUS 3 years later.
What does it mean? Don't have a clue, but it's frickin weird.
This isn't some account who posted a vague hint. The account's only action ever was to post the exact name of someone who tried to assassinate the POTUS 3 years later.
What does it mean? Don't have a clue, but it's frickin weird.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:35 pm to AlterEd
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:37 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Can you explain why someone with only one obscure post in 3 years has 1500 followers?
It was only 500 when I posted this thread. The reason is obvious. This is making the rounds and people are following the account.
I would imagine that before tonight the account had very few, if any, followers.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 11:45 pm to AlterEd
quote:
The reason is obvious. This is making the rounds and people are following the account.
Have seen this happen multiple times with older YouTube videos.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 5:55 am to AlterEd
Posted on 4/26/26 at 5:56 am to Kjnstkmn
Posted on 4/26/26 at 6:01 am to Kjnstkmn
Posted on 4/26/26 at 6:02 am to TigerDoc
quote:
TigerDoc
Why does your party just want to kill all of their opponents?
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:01 am to Gifman
Because if you want to let them cheat, then they will have to kill you.
Popular
Back to top


1








