re: This X Account's One and Only Post Named the Shooter 3 Years Ago

The fallacy in your odds calculation is the inclusion of the “three years”. That has nothing to do with the coincidence. Had it been four years you would have calculated the same odds. You could get even higher odds by including “and it was discovered by so-and-so”.

Or it’s a name someone posted for a specific reason that has absolutely nothing to do with what happened but you really want it too because the truth isn’t exciting enough

quote:

---

The fallacy in your odds calculation is the inclusion of the “three years”. That has nothing to do with the coincidence. Had it been four years you would have calculated the same odds. You could get even higher odds by including “and it was discovered by so-and-so”.

---

Where do you see "three years" in this conclusion?



Oh, that's right, it isn't there. It wouldn't make a difference if it was 1 day later. The odds are the same. Clueless post.

quote:

---

Ben Stiller had a strange tweet as well.

---

I made a thread on this last night. As someone pointed out it's almost certainly talking about his Knicks getting a playoff victory last night.

Schizo threads are fun

quote:

---

Why does your party just want to kill all of their opponents?

---

TigerDoc was all about Trump being killed as well. He can try to walk it back, but make no mistake, a dead Trump = a happy TigerDoc.

What an I looking at, it’s the guy’s name.

Plus the Pepe avatar, that really fires up the cohencidence meter for me.

quote:

---

Bringing a Q drop out is as ridiculous as boosies thread last night

---

Not even close. Start by looking at the post I was responding to and the themes within that post. Pepe avatar, mentions of time travel. Where do we see those themes? In the Q sphere. Hence the Q drop. It's called discussion, dumb arse.