Started By
Message

re: This X Account's One and Only Post Named the Shooter 3 Years Ago

Posted on 4/26/26 at 6:25 pm to
Posted by Fanatics
Member since Nov 2025
436 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 6:25 pm to
Time traveler trump lol
Posted by Spocks Brain
Member since Nov 2025
250 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 6:26 pm to
I’m really intrigued about all of your comments here. I have dreams that aren’t exactly clear sometimes and then I recall them when I walk into the room I saw in that dream or have an interaction with someone I’ve never spoken with before and don’t know. It’s really bizarre
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11847 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 6:36 pm to
Yeah, also worth noting that handle looks like a pretty standard auto-gen account. It could be a bot, could be a burner, could be nothing, point being there’s a lot of boring ways to get a one-off name post before we jump to anything exotic.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61384 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 6:39 pm to
Déjà vu
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11873 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

That's not how probabilities work. It's how loony conspiracy theorists *think* probabilities work.



You can calculate odds for any frickin thing you want. And yes, those are the odds of such an event happening.

I have no idea why people are trying to, what, explain this away as something that isn't odd? I didn't even make any claims here in the OP. Just pointed out something that is super frickin strange regarding the attempted assassination of the POTUS. Because, well, it is super frickin strange and I thought people might want to discuss it. The rush of some people to come in and make retarded posts like the one I just quoted is also... strange.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13743 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 6:17 am to
Posted by MidWestGuy
Illinois
Member since Nov 2018
2002 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 8:51 am to
quote:

You can calculate odds for any frickin thing you want. And yes, those are the odds of such an event happening.
But that doesn't mean any frickin thing is relevant to the odds. Made up example:

I got in a car crash at a specific intersection, guy ran a red light on mm/dd/yy @ 2:43 PM.

I was on my way to a job interview. I got the interview because I mentioned to the guy that cuts my hair I had a car for sale. He knew someone who wanted that specific year/model. So I met that guy, and and as we talked, I learned his cousin was in the same industry as me, and his cousin had some job openings. So I contacted him, and got this interview. And got in the car crash.

So what are the odds I decided I needed a hair cut on that day, got that barber, talked about the car, etc, etc, etc..... Sure you can calculate those odds if you want. But it's meaningless compared to "What are my odds of getting in a car crash this year, assuming I drive 12,000 miles a year in this area?"

You are adding all these specific details to it to make the odds look to be something they are not.

quote:

I have no idea why people are trying to, what, explain this away as something that isn't odd? I didn't even make any claims here in the OP.
And I didn't respond to your OP. OK, it's odd. But that doesn't mean it is or isn't relevant to anything at all. I only jumped in to agree with another poster that there are way more than one Cole Allen alive 3 years ago.
This post was edited on 4/27/26 at 8:55 am
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11873 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:36 am to
So yes, it would seem that this account was indeed referencing the Cole Allen that tried to shoot the POTUS. This should put to bed all of the people saying, "but there's lots of Cole Allens out there" as if that makes it any less odd.
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3701 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:13 am to
quote:

it's easier to lift someone up than to drag them down

Not if you have a bad back.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:57 am to
Interesting and wild stuff.

Let’s assume for a second that the X post from 3 years ago did involve time travel or seeing into the future or something along those lines.

What would have been the reasoning/goal/purpose of the person or persons to post just the name? Or to make any post in the first place?
This post was edited on 4/27/26 at 12:19 pm
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 11:05 am to
Also I found this possible explanation earlier…

quote:

However, before the theory runs too far, fact-checker journalist David Puente offered a more grounded explanation. The 'well-known technique' involves creating a private account and publishing a large volume of hidden posts of popular names and potential future events. If one of those events eventually occurs, the user deletes everything else, makes the matching post public, and allows the illusion of foresight to do the rest. To maximise the chances of a hit, users tend to use names that already have some public profile — like minor actors or public figures that 'sooner or later, will be linked to an event (crime, murder, drugs, etc.),' Puente explained.
LINK:Article about WHCD time travel theory
This post was edited on 4/27/26 at 11:17 am
Posted by MidWestGuy
Illinois
Member since Nov 2018
2002 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 11:05 am to
quote:

So yes, it would seem that this account was indeed referencing the Cole Allen that tried to shoot the POTUS. This should put to bed all of the people saying, "but there's lots of Cole Allens out there" as if that makes it any less odd.

It *is* odd that a one time poster mentions a name, and no follow up, nothing else.

It might actually be *less* odd, that the name mentioned was someone who did something crazy 3 years later. As I wrote above, maybe the one-time poster was aware at the time (3 years ago) that Cole Allen was trouble, started to write a post about it to warn others, and either got distracted, or just stopped there for whatever reason (fear of retribution?). The one post might be because he wanted to remain anonymous, because he knew the guy was trouble.

Odd, but that's all. Not mystical, there are several rational explanations.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11847 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 11:14 am to
Interesting. There is a "minor actor" named Cole Allen (IMDB) (I'm not able to get to your link, though).

I wonder how Puente's theory could be confirmed/disconfirmed, though.
This post was edited on 4/27/26 at 11:17 am
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
95026 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 11:41 am to
No it’s not. Probably scrolled back and edited a post he made from that time and came back for engagement farming hoping for followers and attention
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram