- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/19/23 at 2:13 pm to TejasHorn
quote:
And anything involving “human cooperation” to solve a problem is suspect.
Tell your beloved John Kerry to confiscate some family farms, Che.
Posted on 5/19/23 at 2:17 pm to djmed
Even if this is true, eliminating CFCs was a lot more feasible and practicable than eliminating fossil fuels when there still aren't viable and affordable alternatives, which is where we are now.
Another liberal talking point from back in the day was saving the whales. But nowadays, whales are dying because of offshore windmills, and that's totally okay. Apparently, the whales only mattered before green energy was a thing.
Another liberal talking point from back in the day was saving the whales. But nowadays, whales are dying because of offshore windmills, and that's totally okay. Apparently, the whales only mattered before green energy was a thing.
Posted on 5/19/23 at 2:20 pm to Tall Tiger
quote:
Another liberal talking point from back in the day was saving the whales.
Then it became polar bears. Have no clue what animal they've never seen they want to save today.
Posted on 5/19/23 at 2:21 pm to djmed
It’s bc chicks stopped using a can of Aqua Net hairspray daily.
Posted on 5/19/23 at 2:30 pm to djmed
quote:
And there’s a good reason for that — it’s because human cooperation and swift policy change were extremely effective in fixing the problem.
You just gave the climate czar and green new deal all the ammo they need. "See it works"
Posted on 5/19/23 at 2:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Don’t forget the Snail Darter…
Posted on 5/19/23 at 2:52 pm to djmed
Did exploding nuclear bombs have an effect on the ozone layer or any other aspects of the atmosphere? Does operating HARP and heating the ionosphere contribute to anything? Chlorofluorocarbons may have been a problem but what about other possibilities and fear mongering. Trust the science.
Posted on 5/19/23 at 2:58 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
In just one spot?
The spot is formed where the F5 CFC Vortex touches the ozone layer.
Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:00 pm to TejasHorn
quote:
And anything involving “human cooperation” to solve a GLOBAL problem is suspect.
- People with intelligence and common sense
Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:00 pm to djmed
There is tons of ozone in major cities (a big part of smog). I suggested way back when to use cfc's in these cities to get rid of the smog.
No one listened to me. I assumed it was because I was like 10 at the time
No one listened to me. I assumed it was because I was like 10 at the time
Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:05 pm to djmed
lulz
The earlier predictions claimed
Now its 2060. Probably because after 19 years of recovery, we saw the largest hole ever in 2006. Then we observed only a 20% decrease in ozone depletion 2006 to 2016. So Now in 2023, we are 40 more years away from it recovering
lulz again
By 2060 it will have been moved to the year 3000. Despite all the laws and product changes that, well, changed nothing. Heres the receipts
Ozone hole when we starting saving the planet in 1987 was 19.3. Now its 23.2, after 3 decades of work

The earlier predictions claimed
quote:
Models predict that the Antarctic ozone layer will mostly recover by 2040.
Now its 2060. Probably because after 19 years of recovery, we saw the largest hole ever in 2006. Then we observed only a 20% decrease in ozone depletion 2006 to 2016. So Now in 2023, we are 40 more years away from it recovering
lulz again
By 2060 it will have been moved to the year 3000. Despite all the laws and product changes that, well, changed nothing. Heres the receipts
quote:
2006 26.6
2007 22.0
2008 25.2
2009 22.0
2010 19.4
2011 14.7
2012 17.8
2013 21.0
2014 20.9
2015 25.6
2016 20.7
2017 17.4
2018 22.9
2019 9.3
2020 23.5
2021 23.3
2022 23.2
Ozone hole when we starting saving the planet in 1987 was 19.3. Now its 23.2, after 3 decades of work


Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:07 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
2019 9.3
Trump did that!!
quote:
2020 23.5
Damn kung-flu
Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:08 pm to djmed
Funny how the manmade ozone hole formed over one of the least populated areas on earth.


Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:18 pm to djmed
quote:
Last summer, false suggestions began circulating on social media that the panic about the hole in the ozone layer was unwarranted, and that the current urgency about the overheating of our planet is similarly unjustified
It was unwarranted.
It was not a coincidence that the "holes" were at the poles and got bigger and smaller depending on the time of year (i.e., amount of direct sunlight).
Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:22 pm to djmed
That was the first political enviro football….
No thanks. I don’t believe anything from the climate freaks!
No thanks. I don’t believe anything from the climate freaks!
Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:25 pm to djmed
Because it’s old news.
Stand in an open field with no shirt on for an hour tomorrow. Report back afterwards.
In the 1980’s the closest thing to sun block was some sort of tanning oil. Kids played in the sun all day without getting sunburn.
You didn’t wear sun protection clothes or creams back then. I wonder what changed?
Stand in an open field with no shirt on for an hour tomorrow. Report back afterwards.
In the 1980’s the closest thing to sun block was some sort of tanning oil. Kids played in the sun all day without getting sunburn.
You didn’t wear sun protection clothes or creams back then. I wonder what changed?
Posted on 5/19/23 at 3:36 pm to Motownsix
it`s always been a scam,if depleted ozone were an issue,make more and release it,it can be man made.every time
lightning strikes it creates ozone ,freon is a scam Dow is in on it.the biggest releasers of cfc`s are nuclear power plants,and are allowed to releas it directly into the air,whereas you AC guy has to contain it and recycle it.
lightning strikes it creates ozone ,freon is a scam Dow is in on it.the biggest releasers of cfc`s are nuclear power plants,and are allowed to releas it directly into the air,whereas you AC guy has to contain it and recycle it.
This post was edited on 5/19/23 at 3:42 pm
Popular
Back to top
