Started By
Message

re: Things for Christians to consider in regards to immigration.

Posted on 7/13/14 at 3:59 pm to
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 3:59 pm to
Yep, I've noticed that a lot of "conservatives" are reversing themselves on this issue just because it's kids. Very disturbing. They rounded up a bunch of kids, brought them to the border and had them all make droopy eyed faces to tug on everyone's heart strings.

I didn't surrender my second amendment rights after Sandy Hook and I'm not supporting amnesty and open borders over this shite. It's mass manipulation. frick these people.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:04 pm to
You people do realize that the kids are simply being used as pawns, right? A lot of sorry, greedy bastards are profiting off of these children.

As the little dog Toto in the Wizard of Oz should have taught all of us, sometimes you have to pull back the curtain in order to expose the charade.

Why should America just sit quietly and allow a bunch of corrupt individuals to play us for fools?
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:04 pm to
You can have compassion and understanding for these immigrants wanting a better life but still remain firm in opposition to the problem this creates in the big picture and long term future.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

I was for land mines 20 years ago. I'm still for land mines. No one has convinced me that it won't work. Cheap, efficient and nobody gets hurt.

People get hurt by landlines every day, over 50 million worldwide, unexploded, some which go back to WW1.

The reason they work in Korea is because no one wants to go north and anyone wishing to go south gets nabbed by the police state long before they reach the mine fields.

All shitty James Bond movies notwithstanding.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:07 pm to
You can be for secured borders and have compassion for these children. You're creating a false dichotomy. You can be for secure borders and NOT be for shooting children.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

The reason they work in Korea is because no one wants to go north and anyone wishing to go south gets nabbed by the police state long before they reach the mine fields.



Right. I would be really worried if America built a wall or put in landmines, because I would know that they were meant to keep me in, and not keep people out.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20941 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

This isn't directed at anyone particular on this board, but I felt moved today to share this.


Ok, but just because you want them deported doesn't mean you "hate children."
This post was edited on 7/13/14 at 4:15 pm
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

My attitude about the issue began to change when I listened to a speech by Milton Friedman. His point, which is repeated on the board many times, is you can have open borders or you can have open welfare, but you can't have both.


That is true, the problem is the left believes you can have both. It's going to come to a head if we don't do something about it.

I say reform both.

LC
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Ok, but just because you want them deported doesn't mean you "hate children."



No it doesn't. We are human though. We get caught up in this political show, how manipulative and duplicitous it is, and we can let our attitudes become hateful. Why should anyone get angry at Glenn Beck for sending food, clothes and toys to those children? And yet people did. What does that say about them?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58407 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 4:57 pm to
This is comparable to the welfare situation in this country. When is a person or country expected to take care of itself or It's own? People that Jesus helped in the bible were of no fault of their own destitute because of a death or infirmity.
In the case of welfare here, people make choices throughout life that affects their future status. Whether that involves getting an education, getting work training, using birth control, choosing a husband, etc. Those decisions and others contribute largely to a persons future situation.
As far as Mexico and other countries, many have adequate natural and human resources to care for their own, but because of historically bad choices and corruption, they have allowed themselves to be relegated to third world status. Some would say its unfair to the citizens that their government officials are corrupt, but these government officials came from their own communities and are made up of their own. Why aren't they responsible for cleansing corruption from their own ranks.
With that being said, would Jesus want to take from people who made good choices and put themselves in position to succeed to give to those who either refuse to help themselves, or those who had a chance to stunt corruption in their midsts but didn't? Giving to those who refuse to work or help themselves is stealing.
This post was edited on 7/13/14 at 4:59 pm
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 5:00 pm to
While I agree in principle with your perspective, the truth is the liberal progressive Democrats are getting to have their cake and eat it too. The fact is we DO have a welfare state and open borders by design in order for Dems to secure an even larger minority default voting block. The Pubs can pull their pants down and allow amnesty at every opportunity but the the Dems with a compliant media will always make the liberal progressives the champion of minority welfare.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
91226 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 5:03 pm to
I agree.

I think we should address this issue by securing the borders and then making the legalization process more streamlined. We have to secure the borders tight for drug trafficking reasons even with an open immigration policy.

Then once we do that, give amnesty to the ones already here but do it with stipulations. IF any one of the immigrants commits 5 misdemeanors within 10 years they are deported. They also would not be eligible for any form of welfare for 10 years after amnesty...get a job or accept charity but you're not coming here to live off the taxpayers.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10704 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 5:10 pm to
We should use the state to help the children. As Christians we can take control of the state and use our values to help the children. There is nothing wrong with the state helping the children when it is infused with Christian values.

Glenn Beck doesn't care about the children he's just looking to get more members for his cult.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16354 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 5:11 pm to
It is time to realize that the countries to our south have declared war on the USA. Bring the troops home and secure the border. Tell Mexico that anyone trying to enter from our border with them will fall squarely on their heads.
Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 5:19 pm to
If the folks who believe that we should welcome thos kids into the country would load up and bring a busload into their home, I would be convinced that they are serious. If they are wanting someone to "share the burden", not so much.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27387 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

Jessus needs to toss down some of them loaves and fishes. And, I don't "hate" your children.....but, i don't want them in my house, either. I am sick to death of the "do it for the children" garbage.

This. I'm fine with letting them in to earn a living. I don't think immigrants should EVER qualify for welfare. Only natural born citizens and even then, they should have to work of it. Liberals keep spouting FAIR SHARE bullshite. Well, I pay more than my "fair share" while millions sit on their asses and will never ever do jack shite. How is that fair to us working and paying taxes? And quit incentivizing them to keep fricking reproducing. Shitasses breed more shitassed. It's fricking science. Why can't the "party of science" get that?
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 5:31 pm to
No one hates the children that coming here. But they're not entitled to citizenship.

Above and beyond everything, they're a health risk.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 5:41 pm to
I'm not saying we should shoot anyone. I just don't want this obvious scam to work. The reason they're all from south of Mexico is to make it more expensive to deport them all.

And you do realize that MANY are not children at all. All claim to be, but take a closer look. Pulling your heart strings is the objective, and it worked. Be glad that you're a human being but don't be gullible enough to buy this shite.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

This is comparable to the welfare situation in this country. When is a person or country expected to take care of itself or It's own? People that Jesus helped in the bible were of no fault of their own destitute because of a death or infirmity.
In the case of welfare here, people make choices throughout life that affects their future status. Whether that involves getting an education, getting work training, using birth control, choosing a husband, etc. Those decisions and others contribute largely to a persons future situation.
As far as Mexico and other countries, many have adequate natural and human resources to care for their own, but because of historically bad choices and corruption, they have allowed themselves to be relegated to third world status. Some would say its unfair to the citizens that their government officials are corrupt, but these government officials came from their own communities and are made up of their own. Why aren't they responsible for cleansing corruption from their own ranks.
With that being said, would Jesus want to take from people who made good choices and put themselves in position to succeed to give to those who either refuse to help themselves, or those who had a chance to stunt corruption in their midsts but didn't? Giving to those who refuse to work or help themselves is stealing.



I'm not disputing the merits of the welfare state. I think all taxation is theft.

I'm simply speaking about the Christian response to immigrants, which should be down out of a love for Jesus, and not letting the irresponsibility and duplicity of the state sully our attitudes.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64830 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

You can be for secure borders and NOT be for shooting children.


Who voted for shooting children?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram