- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Things Aren't Looking Great For Trump In Supreme Court Tariff Arguments
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:18 pm to somethingdifferent
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:18 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
1. Have you looked at our debt? Is it going up or down?
You can thank the Obama/Trump/Biden economy.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:18 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
I all but quoted you halfwit.
No you didnt, toothless illiterate. Another lie.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:19 pm to somethingdifferent
I haven't read this thread but heard a snippet from the arguments. Barrett will side with the liberals. May even be more conservatives siding with the liberals.
I don't expect Trump to win this
Which means the tariffs will unwind
Which means we owe back money already spent
Which means economy going to shitter
I don't expect Trump to win this
Which means the tariffs will unwind
Which means we owe back money already spent
Which means economy going to shitter
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:19 pm to duckblind56
quote:
I see you never answered my question to you on are you really a idiot dickhead are just do this for fun.
Which one? I'm arguing with 5 of you Statists right now.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:20 pm to ABearsFanNMS
1. Tariffs are stupid in other countries too, because they make your citizenry pay more. Other countries love tariffs because their citizens love paying taxes.
2. VATs are not a tariff or a trade barrier. They are just a procedurally different method of collecting sales taxes. It would be like if Louisiana refused to do business with Texas because Texas has a sales tax.
2. VATs are not a tariff or a trade barrier. They are just a procedurally different method of collecting sales taxes. It would be like if Louisiana refused to do business with Texas because Texas has a sales tax.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:20 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Absolutely false
quote:
Debatable
You think its debatable whether the constitution gives authority for the President to impose tariffs unilaterally?
Also, I do not know which way the court will go here. However, citing IPPEA was both fantastic lawyering and flimsy at best
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:23 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Go read the article I cited. You are wrong and you are ignorant.
No they arent
quote:See this is why you need to bow out. You don't even understand the conversation. If you had read the article I sent you, you would know why this is a stupid statement. No one said anything about companies who buy steel wanting tariffs.
Why would a US company buying Chinese products want tariffs?
Until you start trying to learn, you are going to be impossible to converse with.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:24 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
See this is why you need to bow out. You don't even understand the conversation.
Sure I do.
Companies making import deals dont want tariffs, unless they are "too big to fail."
Since I am a respectful chap, do you prefer to be called "Big Business Afficianodo" or just plain Statist?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:26 pm to dafif
quote:
Remember when Obama care was just a tax even though everyone said it was not tax
Different type of analysis. That was over whether the law itself was Constittuional.
quote:
Why doesn't the same thing apply for Tariffs - there is a wall that justifies their use and gives the president the power to do it if he specifically said the wrong law that doesn't mean that it is unlawful if there is a right law to be applied
That system would just give unlimited powers to the President. How would we even know which "right law" is being applied?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Does the govt own TSMC yes or no?
But since you asked this dumb quesiton, the government gave TSMC 6-7 billion dollars to come here
You are absolutely dense. You don't understand this situation at all. You are like a 5 year old
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:27 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Does the govt own TSMC yes or no?
The term youre looking for is "heavily subsidizes."
Its pretty fricking socialist
Trumps having the US buy stock in Intel is socialist.
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:30 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Uhhhh…don’t we want our SCOTUS justices (& all judges for that matter) asking tough questions?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
RogerInTheCuckChair
What's it like sitting in the cuck chair ?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:OMG. The "Trump" economy was NOTHING like the other 2.
You can thank the Obama/Trump/Biden economy.
Second, it doesn't even matter. We are in this dire situation where manufacturing needs to return to domestic shores. It is a crisis and at least 1 adult is trying to fix it. He has to fight against brain dead tariff idiots like you who think there's not a problem and think that tariffs are "left" and necessarily lead to a command economy, which they don't.
When asked what your solution was, you said "stop having enemies."
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:you are lying. Go back to the other thread
No you didnt, toothless illiterate
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:32 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
OMG. The "Trump" economy was NOTHING like the other 2.
Trump pushed more than Obama, youre correct there.
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:32 pm to somethingdifferent
Ok. That's all fine. It may all be true
How can he impose the tariffs he is imposing...Constitutionally?
How can he impose the tariffs he is imposing...Constitutionally?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:33 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
somethingdifferent
Do you support the trump administration buying 10% stock in Intel?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:33 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Apparently SCOTUS thinks it's debatable
You think its debatable whether the constitution gives authority for the President to impose tariffs unilaterally?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:33 pm to PJinAtl
quote:
What are the chances any of that garners 60+ votes in the Senate?
If it really is an issue of national security, then nuke the filibuster.
But in the real world, you just negotiate with the Dems to get them to go along. Maybe Trump doesn't get the exact tariffs he wanted, but that is how government works.
Trump's first term USMCA agreement was codified with - I think - 89 votes in the Senate. Granted, that treaty was anti-tariff, but it shows you can get bilateral support for foreign trade agreements that make sense.
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 3:37 pm
Popular
Back to top


1






