- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Things Aren't Looking Great For Trump In Supreme Court Tariff Arguments
Posted on 11/5/25 at 2:55 pm to somethingdifferent
Posted on 11/5/25 at 2:55 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
might be an incorrect ruling anyway and is clearly about a dire situation that needs to be corrected asap
Why would it be incorrect
The direness of the situation is irrelevant. He needs congressional authority to impose tariffs. He either has it or he doesn't.
Congress can...pass something giving him the specific or broad authority
1
Posted on 11/5/25 at 2:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:But it sure does show your idiocy
An example involving a jury determination has no conceptual overlap with one of Constitutional-statutory analysis
Posted on 11/5/25 at 2:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That still requires specific Congressional authorization via statute.
He's cited several, not the least of which is the IEEPA. Further, under the Trade Act of 1974, Congress ceded authority for the EB to identify foreign trade practices that are unfair, discriminatory or burden U.S. commerce, and then impose retaliatory tariffs on parties involved.
Congress could also revoke the Trump Tariffs altogether.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 2:58 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:\
I cited an article for you proving you are wrong.
No you didnt.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 2:58 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:You know where they are fraud
Ask away goober
quote:Aside from being a liar, aside from you not even understanding the tariff situation, you falsely equivocated that tariffs are necessarily a step towards govt ownership of private business, which is laughably false and you have no proof
I'm going to give you the correct conservative position
Posted on 11/5/25 at 2:59 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
An example involving a jury determination has no conceptual overlap with one of Constitutional-statutory analysis
But it sure does show your idiocy
You cant understand a word the man said.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:00 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:THEY'RE TELLING YOU THERE’S A PROBLEM GENIUS
Ask the US companies that have contracts for them
I cited an article explaining it to you
You must have the same autistic condition that SFP does. You can't even understand basic reality
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:01 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Ask away goober
You know where they are fraud
Nope, not reading pages of your retarded drivel.
Ask away.
quote:
you falsely equivocated that tariffs are necessarily a step towards govt ownership of private business,
No, youre just an average MAGA retard. I said nothing of the sort.
I did say both are practices of a command economy, which is fact. You dont even know what that means.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:02 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
THEY'RE TELLING YOU THERE’S A PROBLEM GENIUS
No they arent. Why would a US company buying Chinese products want tariffs?
You are really stupid.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:But but they're so illegal. WAAAHHHH. WAAHHHHH. WAHHHHH!!!!!!!
Democrats are retarded and love income redistribution
quote:There's that false equivocation again. But i get that you have to rely on strawman characterizations in order to not admit you're stupid about tariffs.
just like you
"I don't have to prove my case because that mean ole Trump bought some stocks in a company." WAAHHHHH. WWAAHHHHHH. WWWWAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH
RTS is seriously calling the most capitalist man on the planet a Bernie Sanders socialist
What a joke
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:07 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Remember when Obama care was just a tax even though everyone said it was not tax
Why doesn't the same thing apply for Tariffs - there is a wall that justifies their use and gives the president the power to do it if he specifically said the wrong law that doesn't mean that it is unlawful if there is a right law to be applied
I'm guessing that is the ruling
Why doesn't the same thing apply for Tariffs - there is a wall that justifies their use and gives the president the power to do it if he specifically said the wrong law that doesn't mean that it is unlawful if there is a right law to be applied
I'm guessing that is the ruling
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:07 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
RTS is seriously calling the most capitalist man on the planet a Bernie Sanders socialist
You dont understand any of those words.
What are the pillars of conservatism?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:You seriously don't know anything about this topic do you? Did the govt force TSMC to open a facility in AZ? YES OR NO FRAUD
Why do you need the government to do it for you?
Why are you so stuck on that false equivocation? Are you incapable of learning? Maybe your iq has hit a ceiling and this is as good as you can do
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:11 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:1. Have you looked at our debt? Is it going up or down?
Because your lifestyle is much better here
2. Have you seen US major cities lately? Are they trending up or down?
3. What lessons were learned from the computer processor crisis?
4. Is it possible that even though the US is better off at the moment, we can still strive to correct a horrible imbalance to make the economy even better than it already is?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:13 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Why are they still deliberating? Because it's being decided and there's no guarantee they'll get it right
Why would it be incorrect
quote:Absolutely false
The direness of the situation is irrelevant
quote:Debatable
He needs congressional authority to impose tariffs
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Dang. What's it like being retarded? Does it hurt?
No you didnt
I even pulled a quote into the post that had the citation for your little mind because I figured the words were all too big for you. Many of them had more than 4 letters
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:15 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
You seriously don't know anything about this topic do you? Did the govt force TSMC to open a facility in AZ?
Youre an idiot. A real idiot.
But since you asked this dumb quesiton, the government gave TSMC 6-7 billion dollars to come here
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:16 pm to RollTide4547
quote:
Why are you arguing they are not constitutional then?
Im not arguing the constitutionality, you are.
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:17 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I see you never answered my question to you on are you really a idiot dickhead are just do this for fun.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:17 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:THERE WE GO.
Nope, not reading pages of your retarded drivel
Fingers in ears. The cry of the loser
quote:I all but quoted you halfwit. Good back to the other thread, get your parents to read it to you. You freaking whined on and on and on about how mean ole Trump had bought stock in a company. SEE! SEE! He's trying to take over!
I said nothing of the sort.
You are pathetic
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News