- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The ultimate irony is going to be when "horse-paste" ends up being better than the vaccine
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:32 pm to stout
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:32 pm to stout
quote:
"horse-paste"
Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe, or do we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves?
Because one of those is valid and the other will always be deserving of ridicule.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:50 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
It was for me... And for my 80 something year old parents... . None of us got sick..
And your point?
I took the vaccine - but didn't have full faith in it - I am 85 and 'long term' potential problems is not one of my concerns.
However, If I had contracted Covid, I would have gone to my doctor in Leon Co. who would given me the horse paste
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:51 pm to stout
Supposedly it was used almost exclusively in India, so pretty sure the evidence supports.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:53 pm to stout
I already know it was.
Oh, and for you that took it. Be glad that a lot of the mRNA was mishandled and were duds.
Oh, and for you that took it. Be glad that a lot of the mRNA was mishandled and were duds.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:55 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
The question is WHY were people forced to resort to horse paste?
Ivermectin is Historically one of the safest drugs of all time until the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex said it wasn't.
$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:55 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe
I think some should be most, and wouldn't can be interchanged with couldn't very easily.
quote:
so we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves
Only the idiots that can't do simple math to determine the correct dosage in paste form per pound of mammal vs a tablet.
But you can't overdose on it, so what if you squeeze out a little to much into the gel-cap.
It wouldn't be shite if it tasted like peppermint.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:56 pm to BamaAtl
Is that according to the Walgreens pharmacists you work with as a pharmacy tech?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:56 pm to stout
Here is the truth. If they admitted Ivermectin worked, then they couldn't get emergency authorization.
If they could not get emergency authorization then they would have to go through a regular trial and this thing never gets approved that way.
If they could not get emergency authorization then they would have to go through a regular trial and this thing never gets approved that way.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:57 pm to keks tadpole
quote:
I think some should be most, and wouldn't can be interchanged with couldn't very easily.
Go for it.
Same question...
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:02 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
There were doctors writing covid scripts for things like "Lyme disease" to get around the blockade, and lost their licenses over it. Others were putting sourcing and dosing directions online to get around the blockade. I dont like either, but I didnt like the blockade more. People and their docs should have maintained their right to try - especially for such a low risk treatment. I doubt anyone would have eaten horse paste without the fear mongering and draconian restrictions in the first place, but the stupidity of the American people never ceases to amaze.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe, or do we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves?
Both are the same. Maybe research where they knew that Ivermectin was beneficial, but suppressed it.
All because Fauci wanted the COVID "shot" to be given. And it was 100% a "shot" as evidence has shown. Vaccine was NOT the proper term in any way.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe, or do we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves?
Your gaslighting never fails, does it? How long after Joe Rogan busted Sanjay Gupta/CNN/CDC on this propaganda did you come up with this semantic bullshite above?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Go for it.
^^ beat me to it - three posts up.
I got CV and the new rotating Dr at the urgent care prescribed Ivermectin.
A month later I call back to discuss, the nurse says "we don't prescribe that here"
"OK is the doc that treated me in?"
"He's gone."
The ACA mandates through coding of diagnosis what drugs are "allowed" treat certain illness, or else.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:07 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I dont like either
Same.
I'm not willing to justify stupidity with more stupidity.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:08 pm to riccoar
quote:
Both are the same.
They aren't the same.
I hope you bought the apple flavor so it at least tasted OK.
Edit:
quote:
And it was 100% a "shot" as evidence has shown. Vaccine was NOT the proper term in any way.
This explains you folks better than I ever could, so thanks for posting it.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:10 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Going to be weird having irony on something that isn't true, but you do you I guess.
Quoting for posterity.
We now know who got the clot shot.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:18 pm to lsu13lsu
quote:
Here is the truth. If they admitted Ivermectin worked, then they couldn't get emergency authorization.
To take it a step further, if they admitted IV worked, and 300 million people started taking it, what happens if the rate per capita of other profitable aliments begin to decline?
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:18 pm to riccoar
The blockade against Ivermectin was wrong. If the pandemic rose to a level of severity that required a suspension of rights to force mask and inoculate an entire working population, people should have been allowed to consult a doctor and try a low risk treatment.
The story about the hospital in NYC who refused to administer a valid Rx for a dying man, and let him die, was the red line on this for me, personally.
We can all chuckle at people who tried veterinary Ivermectin, but we'd have to do so while ignoring the perverse fear and authoritarianism that got us to that point.
The story about the hospital in NYC who refused to administer a valid Rx for a dying man, and let him die, was the red line on this for me, personally.
We can all chuckle at people who tried veterinary Ivermectin, but we'd have to do so while ignoring the perverse fear and authoritarianism that got us to that point.
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:20 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Ivermectin is Historically one of the safest drugs of all time until the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex said it wasn't.
This part was always strange because if ivermectin was so dangerous, why had Merck, the WHO and the Gates Foundation given out BILLIONS of doses to Africans and Latin Americans for the past 30+ years?
LINK
Why would anyone win a Nobel prize for trying to poison Africans and Latin Americans with horse paste?
LINK
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:24 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:The ivermectin saga is a part of one of the saddest episodes in medical history. Politicians and pharmacists intruding into MD-pt confidentiality refusing to fill scripts. Medical societies pressuring MDs to not prescribe medication they were wholly capable of prescribing safely. Journals and organizations suppressing differential CV-19 infectious data in OCP vs non-OCP countries.
Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe, or do we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves?
I still can't say with 100% confidence that ivermectin is or isn't effective. But one thing is for damn sure, NO ONE could say with certainty in 2020 that ivermectin wasn't effective. The kicker of course was in 2020, there was not anything better. The whole episode was a scientific travesty. The public knew it then. They know it now.
...so much so that people wanting to "try anything" were willing to go to horsepaste. That desperation isn't on the public IMO. That is squarely on the shoulders of our pseudomedical government bureaucracy, and the medical community participants who cowed to it.
Popular
Back to top



7






