Started By
Message

re: The ultimate irony is going to be when "horse-paste" ends up being better than the vaccine

Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

"horse-paste"


Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe, or do we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves?

Because one of those is valid and the other will always be deserving of ridicule.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 2:57 pm
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49531 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

It was for me... And for my 80 something year old parents... . None of us got sick..

And your point?

I took the vaccine - but didn't have full faith in it - I am 85 and 'long term' potential problems is not one of my concerns.

However, If I had contracted Covid, I would have gone to my doctor in Leon Co. who would given me the horse paste
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:51 pm to
Supposedly it was used almost exclusively in India, so pretty sure the evidence supports.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27185 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:53 pm to
I already know it was.

Oh, and for you that took it. Be glad that a lot of the mRNA was mishandled and were duds.

Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
7229 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

The question is WHY were people forced to resort to horse paste?

Ivermectin is Historically one of the safest drugs of all time until the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex said it wasn't.


$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
8689 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe

I think some should be most, and wouldn't can be interchanged with couldn't very easily.
quote:

so we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves

Only the idiots that can't do simple math to determine the correct dosage in paste form per pound of mammal vs a tablet.
But you can't overdose on it, so what if you squeeze out a little to much into the gel-cap.
It wouldn't be shite if it tasted like peppermint.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Cromulent
Down the Bayou
Member since Oct 2016
3349 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:56 pm to
Is that according to the Walgreens pharmacists you work with as a pharmacy tech?
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11821 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:56 pm to
Here is the truth. If they admitted Ivermectin worked, then they couldn't get emergency authorization.

If they could not get emergency authorization then they would have to go through a regular trial and this thing never gets approved that way.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

I think some should be most, and wouldn't can be interchanged with couldn't very easily.


Go for it.

Same question...
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47575 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:02 pm to
There were doctors writing covid scripts for things like "Lyme disease" to get around the blockade, and lost their licenses over it. Others were putting sourcing and dosing directions online to get around the blockade. I dont like either, but I didnt like the blockade more. People and their docs should have maintained their right to try - especially for such a low risk treatment. I doubt anyone would have eaten horse paste without the fear mongering and draconian restrictions in the first place, but the stupidity of the American people never ceases to amaze.
Posted by riccoar
Arkansas
Member since Mar 2006
5123 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe, or do we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves?


Both are the same. Maybe research where they knew that Ivermectin was beneficial, but suppressed it.

All because Fauci wanted the COVID "shot" to be given. And it was 100% a "shot" as evidence has shown. Vaccine was NOT the proper term in any way.
Posted by Tomatocantender
Boot
Member since Jun 2021
5597 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe, or do we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves?


Your gaslighting never fails, does it? How long after Joe Rogan busted Sanjay Gupta/CNN/CDC on this propaganda did you come up with this semantic bullshite above?
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
8689 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Go for it.

^^ beat me to it - three posts up.
I got CV and the new rotating Dr at the urgent care prescribed Ivermectin.
A month later I call back to discuss, the nurse says "we don't prescribe that here"
"OK is the doc that treated me in?"
"He's gone."
The ACA mandates through coding of diagnosis what drugs are "allowed" treat certain illness, or else.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 3:09 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

 I dont like either


Same.

I'm not willing to justify stupidity with more stupidity.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Both are the same.


They aren't the same.

I hope you bought the apple flavor so it at least tasted OK.

Edit:
quote:

And it was 100% a "shot" as evidence has shown. Vaccine was NOT the proper term in any way.


This explains you folks better than I ever could, so thanks for posting it.
This post was edited on 10/12/22 at 3:11 pm
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28657 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Going to be weird having irony on something that isn't true, but you do you I guess.



Quoting for posterity.

We now know who got the clot shot.
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
8689 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Here is the truth. If they admitted Ivermectin worked, then they couldn't get emergency authorization.

To take it a step further, if they admitted IV worked, and 300 million people started taking it, what happens if the rate per capita of other profitable aliments begin to decline?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47575 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:18 pm to
The blockade against Ivermectin was wrong. If the pandemic rose to a level of severity that required a suspension of rights to force mask and inoculate an entire working population, people should have been allowed to consult a doctor and try a low risk treatment.
The story about the hospital in NYC who refused to administer a valid Rx for a dying man, and let him die, was the red line on this for me, personally.

We can all chuckle at people who tried veterinary Ivermectin, but we'd have to do so while ignoring the perverse fear and authoritarianism that got us to that point.
Posted by Lightning
Texas
Member since May 2014
3118 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Ivermectin is Historically one of the safest drugs of all time until the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex said it wasn't.


This part was always strange because if ivermectin was so dangerous, why had Merck, the WHO and the Gates Foundation given out BILLIONS of doses to Africans and Latin Americans for the past 30+ years?
LINK

Why would anyone win a Nobel prize for trying to poison Africans and Latin Americans with horse paste?
LINK
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138940 posts
Posted on 10/12/22 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Do we mean Ivermectin that some doctors wouldn't prescribe, or do we mean the shite some idiots were buying at TSC and dosing to themselves?
The ivermectin saga is a part of one of the saddest episodes in medical history. Politicians and pharmacists intruding into MD-pt confidentiality refusing to fill scripts. Medical societies pressuring MDs to not prescribe medication they were wholly capable of prescribing safely. Journals and organizations suppressing differential CV-19 infectious data in OCP vs non-OCP countries.

I still can't say with 100% confidence that ivermectin is or isn't effective. But one thing is for damn sure, NO ONE could say with certainty in 2020 that ivermectin wasn't effective. The kicker of course was in 2020, there was not anything better. The whole episode was a scientific travesty. The public knew it then. They know it now.

...so much so that people wanting to "try anything" were willing to go to horsepaste. That desperation isn't on the public IMO. That is squarely on the shoulders of our pseudomedical government bureaucracy, and the medical community participants who cowed to it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram