- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Truth: No One is Born Gay or Trans.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 6:29 pm to BarberitosDawg
Posted on 8/29/25 at 6:29 pm to BarberitosDawg
Cool. Was he born gay?
Did he spit his mother’s teat out?
Did he spit his mother’s teat out?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 6:53 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I wonder if Homophobia is considered a mental disorder?
This board? 100%
Posted on 8/29/25 at 7:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Dude, I'm using the Kinsey SCALE
Oh that made is so much clearer
quote:
The Kinsey scale is used in research to describe a person's sexual orientation based on one's experience or response at a given time, and is based both male and female volumes of the Kinsey Reports
quote:
The authors of a 2017 study found that trans and non-binary participants rated the Kinsey scale to be a less valid measure of their sexual orientation than the cisgender participants, due to its reliance on binary terminology.
Even Kinsey stated that his scale didnt depict his research accurately
quote:
The results found in "Sexual Behavior in the Human Female" show a higher number of men who lean towards homosexuality than recorded for the women. Kinsey addresses that the result is contrary to his reports that women have more homosexual leanings than men. He posits that this is e due to the "wishful thinking on the part of such heterosexual males."
Kinsey was a deviant and altered science to advance deviancy to the point we are today
quote:
By the end of Kinsey’s life—and well before the institute was named in his honor—Kinsey had shifted his research to include the filming of various sex acts in his own home near the campus, often including himself (or his wife) in the sexual activities.
“Kinsey loathed Victorian morality as only a person who had been injured by sexual repression could despise it. He was determined to use science to strip human sexuality of its guilt and repression. He wanted to undermine traditional morality, to soften rules of restraint, and to help people develop positive attitudes toward their sexual needs and desires.” This was not a true scientist pressing for data. This was a moral revolutionary who knew exactly what he was doing."
The moral horrors included the sexual abuse of boys, even of male infants. In tables 31 to 34, the sexual response and capacity for orgasm is measured in young boys and infants. That “research” can only come by massive sexual abuse and Kinsey’s purpose in citing the data in the tables was to normalize early sexual behavior of just about any sort.
Quit using any data that he created. He falsified everything to turn sex into his own plaything
Posted on 8/29/25 at 8:11 pm to Freauxzen
quote:Do unto others. Sadly, this has to be explained to you.
You say people are born gay, therefore gay is "good." But people are born lots of things that we try to actively avoid, or train, or teach them out of. And most of these choices made have a variety of moral, scientific, or cultural reasons that we want to make sure people are good contributors to society.
quote:Civility.
What does society have to gain?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 8:32 pm to TX Tiger
Are pedophiles born that way?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 8:53 pm to Narax
They have been pushing the gay/trans stuff on kids so young that don't even know what's what, so they claim to be gay or trans and it's not based on legit feelings and emotions.
With that said, I've known a couple of people since being a child who were extremely feminine as kids even with masculine dads. And they turned out to be gay. So some people are obviously born gay (the for real gay people). Knew a set of identical twins too where one was athletic and played sports with us and the other was extremely feminine and ended up coming out as gay.
With that said, I've known a couple of people since being a child who were extremely feminine as kids even with masculine dads. And they turned out to be gay. So some people are obviously born gay (the for real gay people). Knew a set of identical twins too where one was athletic and played sports with us and the other was extremely feminine and ended up coming out as gay.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 9:02 pm to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
With that said, I've known a couple of people since being a child who were extremely feminine as kids even with masculine dads. And they turned out to be gay.
Smaller males with kind doting moms and masculine dads are more likely to be gay in studies.
This is typically due to identifying more closely with the mom and trying to be more like her.
I posted one of the foundational studies on this a couple pages back.
quote:
Knew a set of identical twins too where one was athletic and played sports with us and the other was extremely feminine and ended up coming out as gay.
Same DNA, this is a argument in favor of family relations influencing homosexual behavior.
One twin felt less like a male in relation to his more traditionally male sibling.
So he gravitated to rejecting male behavior.
In the original separated twin study the one whos brother was "only bi", had sexual fantasies about his twin.
Twins are know to align with and repulsed each other.
Humans are curious.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 1:27 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Do unto others. Sadly, this has to be explained to you.
Yeah that doesn't answer the question.
quote:
Civility
So part of civility is to encourage activities that aren't good for society?
I'm looking for a reason with substance, and you dont seem to be able to answer any question directly.
You can just insult without actually talking about the points. You have no idea what my stance is or what I believe in this point.
Your argument in here is that being gay is scientifically certain, and in our biology and for that reason all other beliefs about it are invalid or weak. People are born gay, therefore being gay is good.
If being gay is a good and moral thing, and that good and moral thing is true only because it is, in your belief, a biological fact, then does that mean that all biological realities are "good?"
If not, then why is this particular biological fact different from other biological facts that we dont have an interest in supporting?
Posted on 8/30/25 at 1:35 am to Freauxzen
Chicken, I don't know what you're paying for your bots, but you're getting your money's worth. I've never seen better trolls. 
Posted on 8/30/25 at 4:13 am to Narax
quote:So the way science works is an observation is made which leads to questions and research. Eventually, based on the research, a hypothesis is formed to address the observation and answer ensuing questions. That hypothesis is then tested. Observations result and the process repeats.
Kinsey making the claim about people being exclusively gay
The Kinsey Scale is a hypothesis.
It is not "a claim" which was then simply accepted as fact.
As a hypothesis, it has been tested over, and over, and over again. It has been tested via studies of homosexual concordance in thousands of monozygotic twins. Environmentally separated MZT's are a rarity to begin with. Homosexual incidence in any such set is obviously extremely rare. In the isolated twin study which you dismissed, the statistical odds of observed homosexual concordance falls in the range of 1 in 2.56 million.
The Kinsey hypothesis has been further tested over the years through surveys of thousands and thousands of respondents. It has been tested physiologically. e.g., Male arousal studies demonstrating virtually no arousal to female stimuli in approximately 2% of men who coincidentally identified as gay and also coincidentally demonstrated prompt arousal to male stimuli. The Kinsey hypothesis been tested genetically with established linkage to Chromosomes 8 and X. Further PET Scan work demonstrates differentiating gay-straight functional cerebral patterns.
Your Asian attraction premise obviously ignores the above facts in the same way a moon landing denier ignores contemporary Soviet tracking or subsequent satellite photography of the landing sites.
But it gets at a larger issue --- attraction vs response or expression. A married man might be very attracted by a beautiful female stranger coming on to him, but he might then suppress his desire d/t fidelity.
Conversely, rather than attraction, his internal reaction to a handsome male stranger coming on to him would likely be revulsion.
However, in both cases the response to the stranger's advance and proposition is an identical measured rejection. Though the response to attraction is controllable, the attraction itself, or lack thereof, is not.
Your premise seems to be that attraction is malleable, that with the proper environment and stimuli, a K0, perhaps like yourself, could be converted to a gay man, just as a gay K6 man could be straightened. There is roughly zero evidence supporting such a premise. There is a mountain of evidence that preferential fluidity among bisexuals exists, with the implication that social pressures could push them to exclusive heterosexuality. But that's a different issue.
I think where we would find common ground though, is in disdain for in-your-face "pride" rainbow LGBTQ+1#$%^ agenda promotion. The fact is, I couldn't care less what someone's bedroom proclivities are. But if you stick it in my face, I care. If you market that crap to kids, I care. If you try to mainstream dangerous gay/trans behavior, I care. A select few of us are hardwired to same-sex attraction. Fine. That doesn't mean I need to play into it or celebrate it.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 8:57 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The Kinsey Scale is a hypothesis.
It is not "a claim" which was then simply accepted as fact.
Let's review
I said
quote:
You say this like it's fact.
You said
quote:
It is.
I'm fine with it being a theory you hold.
quote:
Homosexual incidence in any such set is obviously extremely rare. In the isolated twin study which you dismissed, the statistical odds of observed homosexual concordance falls in the range of 1 in 2.56 million.
I actually found the study you had mentioned and posted it, in the 9 sets of female twins (vs 44 where homosexuality was not present) who were raised separately there was no case where both were homosexual, the conclusion was that for females it is not biological.
For the males, it was 1 set of both gay males (both had first been raped by males at 13).
And 1 set of a gay male and bi male.
(The gay one had first been raped by a male at 12, and the bi one at 15).
This very much is a huge statistical outlier that would indicate molestation at a young age impacted sexuality.
If you have another study feel free to share.
quote:
Male arousal studies demonstrating virtually no arousal to female stimuli in approximately 2% of men who coincidentally identified as gay and also coincidentally demonstrated prompt arousal to male stimuli
Those males had decades of forming their pleasure responses.
There is no coincidence, that's how their brains process reward mechanisms.
Massive dopamine releases associated with things.
Like pedophiles and people who are into animals or dead bodies, or anime girls.
Its known that prolonged exposure to porn can lead to ED in males.
These only tell you where someone is at, not how they got there.
I'm not denying where they are, only saying they got there through life experiences.
Is it a choice for them today? No, just like Pavlov's dog, they will always have that response. Like a fentanyl user, their body is going to have to deal with the impact.
quote:
The Kinsey hypothesis been tested genetically with established linkage to Chromosomes 8 and X.
Sure post the study, how many showed the same base pairs?
Each Chromosome has at least tens of millions of base pairs.
There are well funded efforts to find a genetic basis, but there is no conclusive link.
quote:
Your Asian attraction premise obviously ignores the above facts in the same way a moon landing denier ignores contemporary Soviet tracking or subsequent satellite photography of the landing sites.
Your data isn't what you say it is.
You could easily p-hack a large number of studies to show a genetic predisposition to Asian women in American men.
Its simple statistically, you perform a large number of separate studies on separate samples you withhold all the ones that dont align with your conclusion.
Research from China is rife with this now.
quote:
Your premise seems to be that attraction is malleable,
My premise is that just like everything else in life we like, it's set during childhood as our brain develops. Definitely by 13 at latest these preferences are quite well set and in no way malleable, though I do suppose some could pick up new preferences, dropping one would be possibly insurmountable.
The seminal study on the family with multiple gay twins concluded that the brutal male stereotype father and comforting mother significantly pushed those children into a gay lifestyle beyond any statistically possible way. Its cited in many many of these studies.
quote:
But if you stick it in my face, I care. If you market that crap to kids, I care. If you try to mainstream dangerous gay/trans behavior, I care.
I think we do agree on that (BTW I really do enjoy your responses).
The gay from birth model allows quite a bit of problems for society that the Pride movement takes advantage of to enact some of the efforts you mention.
Abuse - it allows abusers to justify that those under 18 arent being harmed, but that they really always wanted it no matter what age as long as they get a response. Parents wont ask questions about if someone touched their kid in scouts if they think gay was always coming.
Trans parents - it allows the movement to tell parents that there is nothing wrong with surrounding ones kids with gay and Trans pride (school classrooms anyone?), if their kids weren't born gay then there will be no reason it would affect them.
Stereotyping - we see it here plenty of right wing people have said oh you can see it when they are kids totally saw that coming, their dad was manly and they were a weak little flaunting...
Yea, if you dont provide a attainable and relatable male figure in a child's life they will latch onto their mother, we know single mothers raise way more gay males.
By the way I do really believe we are all born Kinsey 2-3 (or 1 to 4 if you prefer based on alignment with male standards).
We really have nothing going on, and we could set on anything, or nothing and we have almost no control over it.
Society and biology will move use towards sex, the dopamine reward function is one of the most powerful drivers in any species.
To quote, if you gave rats a choice between dopamine and food they would bang that dopamine button till they starve to death.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 1:14 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
TX Tiger
Dude, you have yet to have one substantive answer to any question except for "civility" and "feelings."
You crap on others opinions on the basis of some biological certainty that's never been proven, and regardless of that, have actual no backing not only to an unproven biological fact, but any concept of structure as to why might something be one way or another.
You can't even actually define differences between other more proven biological certainties and whether or not something is more moral than the other.
You have no argument. No stance. Just empty "feelings." Come on, man up on this and take a stance on something rather than hiding behind empty insults.
The funny thing is? While I don't at all believe people are biologically gay, I'm not as far away from you as you probably believe. Like I said, you have no idea what I believe.
I just disagree on the premise that preferences that are natural should always be followed and that is a moral good. Which is the stance you so brazenly take without actually understanding the philosophical underpinning of that exact belief.
This post was edited on 8/30/25 at 1:20 pm
Popular
Back to top


0









