- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Supreme Court is CONSIDERING Taking Up a 2020 Election Case
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:33 am to BoarEd
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:33 am to BoarEd
quote:
Hey, not all of us are fake lawyers like Hank. I'm not ashamed to admit that legalese isn't my language.
Speaking of legalese, are you ready to eat crow on trump still running the government yet? I mean he wrote on his application yesterday Biden was the incumbent.
1
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:35 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Speaking of legalese, are you ready to eat crow on trump still running the government yet?
When did I say that Trump is running the Government?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:35 am to BoarEd
Plus it goes a lot deep, did anyone catch Trump’s speech, did anyone really listen to what he said???
Very few picking up the real reason for the Trump address.
Many commentators calling it a nothing burger, is to fail to see what is hidden within it.
Trump says of Nancy House speaker, she is on her way to another country to get fired.
(Read that as shot in Gitmo) - to this point there is a video of Nancy getting put into an all black SUV with some Agents, speculation is she was handcuffed.
Trump did Not say he was running in 2024. He said, I am running for the Presidency.
And he referred to himself as C in C
Very few picking up the real reason for the Trump address.
Many commentators calling it a nothing burger, is to fail to see what is hidden within it.
Trump says of Nancy House speaker, she is on her way to another country to get fired.
(Read that as shot in Gitmo) - to this point there is a video of Nancy getting put into an all black SUV with some Agents, speculation is she was handcuffed.
Trump did Not say he was running in 2024. He said, I am running for the Presidency.
And he referred to himself as C in C
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:37 am to BoarEd
The funny thing to me is how arrogant / cocky you remain. You've been duped (and come here to include others in you being duped) at least 500 times now. And yet you are still somehow cocky enough to end your initial post with:
"Tick tock, bitches."
"Tick tock, bitches."
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:37 am to 4TheLoveLSU
Yeah, that's the second time that he's said Nancy is headed off to foreign lands.
If he meant the Italian ambassador position he would probably have said Italy. But I digress. We need some positive movement of some sort. In a bad way.
If he meant the Italian ambassador position he would probably have said Italy. But I digress. We need some positive movement of some sort. In a bad way.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:38 am to BoarEd
I believe you were leading that q charge prior to the last ban. But looks like you finally caught on to the q bullshite so good on yah!
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:38 am to BoarEd
quote:If they take the case, it will be so they can resolve it 9-0.
What's going to be fricking epically hilarious is if they decide to take up the case (I understand that's unlikely). But in the event they do, this thread will have aged like a fine wine and you dumb shits will be nowhere to be found.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:39 am to SirWinston
quote:
The funny thing to me is how arrogant / cocky you remain.
The funny thing to me is you thinking I give a frick about anything you have to say.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:39 am to 4TheLoveLSU
quote:
Trump says of Nancy House speaker, she is on her way to another country to get fired.
(Read that as shot in Gitmo) - to this point there is a video of Nancy getting put into an all black SUV with some Agents, speculation is she was handcuffed.
This is the same shite my mom parrots. Yall are getting it from some low budget Q show on the web. She also believes that the Queen died 3 years ago and like 15 other things that have not come to fruition. She definitely predicted (as SpecialEd did) 3 or 4 times already that Trump was still President and would be reinstalled by (pick one) January 2021, July 2021, November 2021, July 2022, and finally "sometime before the midterms" which was SpecialEd's last prediction on here.
When none of it comes to pass they just shrug and keep listening as if these hosts aren't lying to them.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 9:41 am
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:40 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Nothing would indicate that Scotus is actually considering doing so.
So no one is going to read the pleadings and supports and make a decision to grant or deny the writ? Because that is the only way the Court will not CONSIDER the application.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:40 am to AggieHank86
quote:
If they take the case, it will be so they can resolve it 9-0.
This brings up something I was going to say about your initial post in this thread.
The resident fake lawyer didn't know that this was a writ application either. Your first post was talking about shooting it down 9-0 too.
So yeah, I didn't understand fully what I was looking at. But neither did you.
I may be stupid, but I'm still smart enough to tell you exactly what your edit was in this post...
You edited in the part about "IF the Supreme Court decides to take this case (unlikely)"
Originally it just read that the SCOTUS doesn't hear evidence and that they're going to shoot it down 9-0.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 9:45 am
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:42 am to SirWinston
Did you watch the speech? I put speculation. You and I have No idea what’s happening behind the scenes in our government, you should really stop walking around acting like you know everything. None of us REALLY knows, but that doesn’t give you the right to cast stones.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:42 am to BoarEd
I’m not holding out any hope here.
What happens if the case is won, does the government investigate itself?
What happens if the case is won, does the government investigate itself?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:43 am to BoarEd
Storm is coming, brother.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:43 am to BoarEd
Got any more links?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:43 am to BoarEd
quote:
What's going to be fricking epically hilarious is if they decide to take up the case (
Even if they did, it seems to only be about the standing issue and not the merits. So your best case, in that scenario, is they send it back for trial.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:43 am to 4TheLoveLSU
Yes it was 30 minutes too long and the same shite that Trump has been saying for 2 years now
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:46 am to BoarEd
quote:
Tick tock, bitches.
The Supreme Court will address it to say everything is above board. They see their ultimate duty as a stabilizing force. Roberts failed in that by rejecting the Pennsylvania grievances and caused a lot of this mess. This is a correction. Don't expect an overturn.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:46 am to BoarEd
I read the entire petition. So congress has a constitutional duty to "investigate" rigged elections?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:48 am to GumboPot
quote:
I read the entire petition. So congress has a constitutional duty to "investigate" rigged elections?
frick if I know. That lawyer seems to think so.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News