- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The price on this Economy IS NOT WORTH it @ this death rate- Sorry
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:43 pm to Covingtontiger77
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:43 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
$8 trillion for 60,000?
It’s not 60k that would die. If 350 million get it and assuming only 1% mortality that is 3.5 million people. Is OP willing to sacrifice 3.5 million Americans?
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:44 pm to SportTiger1
quote:
Getting closer by the day. I'd argue this is the closest to societal collapse since the civil war
I'd say you need to take a chill pill.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:45 pm to fargobison
quote:that's because you don't have the foresight to see the economic hell that's coming to people
want to be a country that pauses things for a month, gets a handle on this the right way and then moves forward prepared for whatever happens next
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:45 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
quote:
If 350 million get it and assuming only 1% mortality that is 3.5 million people.
You just theorized more than 100% of Americans would get the virus. Which is as likely as 80%, I guess.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:03 pm to the808bass
Italy has gone from near 0 to over 41K cases in 18 days with the vast majority of cases in the Lombardy region consisting of ~ 10 Million.
4000 dead and 2K currently critical (demanding an ICU and ventilator). Only 5K cleared leaving 35 thousand either going north or south from a prognosis perspective.
With ~ 3 million in the St Louis Metro area, if unchecked, your ICU beds will be taken up in matter of a week or so and the moral dilemma of who gets to live and who gets to die begins to play out.
Now, go throw yourself a big party with all of your like minded moronic friends with you.
4000 dead and 2K currently critical (demanding an ICU and ventilator). Only 5K cleared leaving 35 thousand either going north or south from a prognosis perspective.
With ~ 3 million in the St Louis Metro area, if unchecked, your ICU beds will be taken up in matter of a week or so and the moral dilemma of who gets to live and who gets to die begins to play out.
Now, go throw yourself a big party with all of your like minded moronic friends with you.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:15 pm to Dallasgrowl
You showed zero of your work.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:17 pm to the808bass
quote:
You showed zero of your work.
Go frick yourself.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:25 pm to LifeTimeTiger2
Social distancing is great. Problem I have is I live in north Louisiana and c.o.p.d., 63 y.o. we were fine up here until the people from south Louisiana came up and have brought the shite with them. I dont want to die quite yet. Hotels are filling up. Just like when hurricane comes. I dont blame them. I'd get the hell out too.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:35 pm to SickGainzLP
quote:
Im not sure you understand. The issue is not the death rate WITH the mitigations. The issue is what will happen if we don't take these steps you are complaining about.
T
agree
quote:
The number you need to look at is the percent of people who require intensive care to survive and recover. That number is astronomical.
What is that number?
quote:
If the ICUs get overwhelmed you have Italy.
How many deaths will there be in Italy? If you were to apply that the US population, how many deaths will that be?
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:49 pm to lsu1919
quote:
We used to exile our elderly. Now we spend excessive amounts of money keeping them alive unnecessarily
Selfish boomers. Just flat-out refuse to go quietly into that good night.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:02 pm to the808bass
quote:
You do understand that the sheltering in place is not theorized to decrease the number of infections, right? It’s just spreading them out.
This is what a LOT of people are not getting, and to be fair the government/doctors/leaders advocating for extreme social distancing have not been clear on it either, and I think we know why. In 2 more weeks, when all the Facebook moms finally learn that locking themselves inside for the past 2 weeks hasn’t made this thing go away, and it in fact has made sure it’ll be around longer, everyone is going to stop doing it.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:06 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
quote:So, you're assuming a nearly 100% contagion rate?
If 350 million get it
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:11 pm to SickGainzLP
quote:
Theres this myth that only people old as frick or with massive health issues are requiring ICU beds and ventilators
There may be this myth, but ok. What % of otherwise healthy cv19 infected people under are in ICUs?
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:12 pm to ShortyRob
At this point maybe we would be better off if we just had everybody get it and deal with the half a percent dying. I know that is 1.7M people. Either have a million plus people die or have a million plus people die and wreck the economy forever.
At this point I am not 100% kidding. If it is so contagious and dangerous and unstoppable just get it over with.
At this point I am not 100% kidding. If it is so contagious and dangerous and unstoppable just get it over with.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:15 pm to gthog61
The mortality rate is only that low because everyone can get care.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:33 pm to Redleg Guy
quote:
The mortality rate is only that low because everyone can get care.
What is "that low"? what is the "not that low"?
We don't even have anything remotely close to adequate testing, especially of recovered and low-to-no-symptomatic positives, to say "that low." it's almost certainly lower.
And we need morbidity numbers to begin to make the sort of analysis to draw anything like your conclusion.
This post was edited on 3/20/20 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:00 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
quote:
It’s not 60k that would die. If 350 million get it and assuming only 1% mortality that is 3.5 million people. Is OP willing to sacrifice 3.5 million Americans?
I appreciate you being willing to put numbers out there. The others in this thread aren't willing and instead just want to say "the numbers are out there".
Unfortunately, your post is way off the mark. It's pretty clear that emotion is driving your opinion vs. the numbers. It makes me wonder if everyone on your side of the aisle is doing the same thing.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:00 pm to SportTiger1
quote:
that's because you don't have the foresight to see the economic hell that's coming to people
If the health care system crumbles here like in Italy, it is going to be a similar hell that is much harder to escape from.
I am not in the shut it down for months crowd either, I get that it isn't sustainable but you need to give people time to be ready and to slow things down for now.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:31 pm to BobABooey
quote:
“If it saves just one life” thinking taken to extremes.
we don't do this when it comes to abortion
Popular
Back to top


3





