- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Official Thread: Russia invades Ukraine
Posted on 4/20/22 at 9:29 am to Palmetto98
Posted on 4/20/22 at 9:29 am to Palmetto98
Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:37 am to Palmetto98
quote:
The negatives for capturing and holding Kiev far out weighed the pros and he either realized this or it was part of a diversion scheme. It’s called adjustments
Kind of like Lee at Gettysburg, Hitler at Stalingrad, or McArthur at the Yalu River!
Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:45 am to Palmetto98
quote:
1). Russia never provided enough manpower & resources to capture and retain Kiev
True.
quote:
2). If Russia wanted to, they could blow Kiev in to the next Stone Age with their missiles and Air Force…why didn’t they do capturing Kiev is so important to them?
True, but to do that they would not have been able to bomb Mariupol and other eastern cities into the Stone Age. Unless of course they went nuclear.
quote:
3). Capturing Kiev would’ve resulted in more casualties and loss of resources for Ukraine to just move its government to Lviv(almost 400 miles away from Kiev) and potentially rally NATO closer to them because the Front would now be on EU borders. In addition, Russia would be in even more hostile territory than where it is now. Keeping the war East makes the most logical sense, this isn’t Putin cock sucking, this is common sense.
But they certainly tried. They obviously felt a quick strike, the capture of the capital, and a quick Ukrainian surrender would follow.
Face it, they failed. They are now changing their strategy as a result. If you can’t see that I can’t help you.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:59 am to Palmetto98
The Russians tried something and it just didn’t work.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 12:06 pm to Lima Whiskey
nm
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 4/20/22 at 1:48 pm to MNCTigah
The Russians have taken Rubezhnoye, immediately north of Severodonetsk.
They’ve also advanced on Lyman, to the north east of Sloviansk.
There have been uncredited reports that the Ukrainians are pulling out of Severodonetsk. They may get mauled by Russian artillery and tactical air in the process, but the Ukrainians will be surrounded and destroyed if they don’t get out. Retreating is the best option even if it’s expensive.
They’ve also advanced on Lyman, to the north east of Sloviansk.
There have been uncredited reports that the Ukrainians are pulling out of Severodonetsk. They may get mauled by Russian artillery and tactical air in the process, but the Ukrainians will be surrounded and destroyed if they don’t get out. Retreating is the best option even if it’s expensive.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 4/20/22 at 2:24 pm to Lima Whiskey
It appears that Russia is finally having a good day.
Let’s see if this starts a trend.
Let’s see if this starts a trend.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 2:39 pm to doubleb
quote:
It appears that Russia is finally having a good day.
Let’s see if this starts a trend.
Based on what? Russia is on the clock, they need to take territory BEFORE western artillery arrives. The Netherlands just provided Ukraine with elite mobile artillery.
In the past, equipment is typically near the front within 24-48 hours of an 'announcement' from a foreign government.
I've seen a few telegraph/twitter reports that the Russian friendly Donetsk forces are falling apart. A complete collapse could come within a few days, from what I've seen.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 2:45 pm to RuLSU
quote:
Based on what
The previously posted reports.
quote:
Russia is on the clock, they need to take territory BEFORE western artillery arrives.
Yes and I stated that we needed to see if this is a trend. It might be their last hurrah or the start of something big. Time will tell.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 2:52 pm to RuLSU
quote:
Based on what? Russia is on the clock, they need to take territory BEFORE western artillery arrives. The Netherlands just provided Ukraine with elite mobile artillery.
NATO isn’t providing enough equipment to replace Ukrainian losses.
The Ukrainians will also have trouble integrating and using these new weapon systems. It will stress their supply chain, imagine operating three different kinds of self propelled guns simultaneously, one, you need unique spares for all three, and then the Ukrainians will need to equip and train their forces to maintain them.
Western reports have spoken some about timelines. And suggested that Putin wants to declare victory by May 9th. The original Russian plan failed, but since they’ve changed strategy, I see no evidence that they’re rushing. Or that they’re pressured by time.
Russia is in a position to grind the Ukrainians down with their substantial firepower advantage.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:31 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Russia is in a position to grind the Ukrainians down with their substantial firepower advantage.
That is certainly conventional wisdom; however, for 7 or 8 weeks now little has been accomplished towards that end. It’s easier said than done.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 7:13 pm to doubleb
quote:
Visegrád 24 @visegrad24 Ukrainian Army preparing for battle in Eastern Ukraine. Rain has been pouring down in recent days, the plains are full of mud. Russia chose a bad moment to launch its new offensive. Their tanks will face massive difficulties yet again.
LINK
Mud and more mud everywhere.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 7:46 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Lima Whiskey
Aren't you the veteran who said that he wished Putin was President of the USA instead of Russia?
quote:
NATO isn’t providing enough equipment to replace Ukrainian losses.
NATO might not be able replacing equipment, but Russia is. Ukraine has lost 25 units of self-propelled artillery. However, they have captured 39 units of self-propelled artillery from Russia. Ukraine has lost 131 tanks but they have captured 211 tanks from Russia.
quote:
The Ukrainians will also have trouble integrating and using these new weapon systems. It will stress their supply chain, imagine operating three different kinds of self propelled guns simultaneously, one, you need unique spares for all three, and then the Ukrainians will need to equip and train their forces to maintain them.
Those are valid points. However, the Ukies are creative people and I am sure the equipment that Russia is supplying Ukraine will keep them well supplied until they can integrate the NATO equipment into their army.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:14 am to WeeWee
Where is the latest map of Ukraine showing Russian advancement?
Posted on 4/21/22 at 3:57 pm to Blutarsky
Lavrov got in some shots in an interview.
LINK
quote:
In February 2014, the European Union helped negotiate a deal between the President and the opposition. Next morning, the signatures of the European Union representatives – France, Germany and Poland – were absolutely ignored by the opposition, who staged a coup and declared that they are creating a “government of the winners,” that they will cancel the special status of the Russian language. They threatened to throw ethnic Russians out of Crimea, they sent armed groups to storm the Crimean parliament. That is how the war started. The Crimeans said: “We don’t want to have anything [to do] with you, leave us alone.” As a I said, there was a threat from armed groups. The eastern areas of Ukraine said: “Guys, we do not support your coup, leave us alone.” They never attacked the rest of Ukraine. The putschists attacked them, having called them terrorists. They called them terrorists for eight long years.
We managed to stop this bloodshed in February 2015 – the so-called Minsk Agreements were signed, providing Eastern Ukraine with some special status, language, the right to have some local police, special economic relations with the adjacent Russian regions. It was basically the same as [the agreement] the European Union negotiated for the north of Kosovo where Serbs live. In both cases, the European Union failed totally to deliver on what was guaranteed by the signatures of its members. For eight long years, the respective governments of Ukraine and Presidents of Ukraine were saying, blatantly and publicly, that they were not going to implement the Minsk agreements, that they will move to Plan B. They continued to shell the territories of these [self-] proclaimed republics during all these years. We warned the Europeans, the Americans, and Ukraine that they are ignoring something which was endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. To no avail.
People do not want to go back into this history because they prefer to take events on their immediate merit, but these particular events are rooted in the desire of the United States and what we call the collective West, to rule, to dominate the world and just show everybody that there would be no multipolarity. It would be only unipolarity.
And that they can declare Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yugoslavia, located tens of thousands of miles from the United States, threats to their security, and can do whatever they please there, levelling cities, like they did with Mosul in Iraq, and Raqqa in Syria. Russia has been warning all its colleagues that just on our borders you have been creating a springboard against us: you have been pumping arms into Ukraine, you have been totally ignoring the legislation of Ukraine, which prohibited, completely prohibited the Russian language, you have been encouraging neo-Nazi ideologies and practices. The neo-Nazi battalions were very much active against the territories which proclaimed themselves independent and who were promised special status. It’s inside Ukraine.
It was all linked with Ukraine becoming NATO’s springboard, and NATO expansion. They were saying that Ukraine will be in NATO. Nobody can stop Ukraine if it so wishes. Then President Zelensky said that he might think about coming back to possess nuclear weapons. In November last year, my President suggested to the United States and to NATO to sit down, to cool off, and to discuss how we can agree on security guarantees without NATO’s further eastward expansion. They refused. In the process, the Ukrainian army radically intensified the shelling of those republics in violation of all the ceasefire agreements. We didn’t have any other choice but to recognise them, to sign mutual assistance treaties with them, and, in response to their request, to send our troops as part of special operation to protect their lives.
quote:
Question: President Zelensky said that Russia plans to use tactical nuclear weapons.
Sergey Lavrov: He says many things. Depends on what he drinks and what he smokes. He says many things.
LINK
This post was edited on 4/21/22 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 4/21/22 at 4:05 pm to Blutarsky
quote:
Where is the latest map of Ukraine showing Russian advancement?
Is this still a thing? I was about to take down my I STAND WITH UKRAIN frame off Twitter and Facebook. I thought we had moved to supporting Disney and telling kids they are gay?
Posted on 4/21/22 at 5:38 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
The Russians tried something and it just didn’t work.
Putin got away with what he wanted in Georgia and Crimea. He put his foot in the Ukraine honey bucket though.
Stalin in Moscow rounded up 5 to 6 million Ukrainians and shipped them off to "exile" never to be seen again. He then starved another 5 to 6 million to death while he exported grain for cash. That all took place well within family generational memory.
Ukrainians have the will to fight.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:10 pm to Auburn1968
Posted on 4/22/22 at 7:55 am to Auburn1968
Haven’t followed the past week or so but let me get this straight. So Biden is now sending Ukraine more money and heavy fighting vehicles. So when Russia blows all of this equipment up do we just keep sending them more shite every two weeks with another $150 mil? Like when does it end?
Posted on 4/22/22 at 9:59 am to TigerAttorney
Yeah this ain’t quite gonna end up like the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 80s, wherein we made all the right moves to assist at all the right times, and as much as anything else it was a perception that America got the best of them and sent them packing with a severe limp.
The roles will be reversed this time, and much like our exit from Afghanistan, we will look extremely foolish and incompetent. And this time it will be the Russians who get the last laugh when people make their conclusions of who “won”.
Which happens to be Biden’s middle name….”Foolish and Incompetent”. And it didn’t have to be that way.
The roles will be reversed this time, and much like our exit from Afghanistan, we will look extremely foolish and incompetent. And this time it will be the Russians who get the last laugh when people make their conclusions of who “won”.
Which happens to be Biden’s middle name….”Foolish and Incompetent”. And it didn’t have to be that way.
This post was edited on 4/22/22 at 10:37 pm
Popular
Back to top


0




