Started By
Message

re: The Number of People Over 40 Giving Birth Surpasses Teens for the First Time

Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:17 pm to
Posted by AgSGT
Dixon, MO
Member since Aug 2011
2094 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

I'm almost 40. I can't imagine having a newborn right now. I'm too damn tired to clean the fricking kitchen after dinner and get the kids to bed already. No way could I handle household duties, work, raising two growing kids, AND a newborn right now.


Shoot, I'm quickly coming up on 50 and have three foster kids, 2,4 & 7. This was not on my bingo card when I was younger. At least with the exhaustion, we sleep somewhat well.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87384 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:18 pm to
I had twins at around 40

It's just not THAT bad and it's way easier when you have money to throw at problems

You've got more perspective, you probably panic less, you might have more flexibility/autonomy/authority in your career, and most people have more money.

I don't think it's the ideal, but I agree, in some ways it's probably easier than trying to figure it out when you're 25 and terrified of your boss and still pretty stupid and poor.
Posted by Locoguan0
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2017
7270 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:18 pm to



By Education Level, Age at first birth
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115482 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:19 pm to
Damn...

And I thought Mrs. udtiger and I were oldsters when we had ours at 33 and 34.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
50076 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

bold of you to assume my offspring identifies as a "bambino"


Great comeback?

Bambino. Bambina. Whatever the gender, don't program them with your woke BS.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61456 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

I had twins at around 40



when I realized I was pregnant last time, my first thought was "please let it only be one."

Props to you.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61456 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Great comeback?



it was a joke.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
50076 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Great comeback?


it was a joke.


Okay. My bad.

No offense, but you aren't exactly Robin Williams.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

I had twins at around 40


Damn, I’m 42 with one in college and another about to finish up his jr year of HS. About to sell all my shite and buy a boat to live on for a few years before I have to come back and help take care of grandkids and elderly parents.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20103 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:28 pm to
quote:


I had twins at around 40

It's just not THAT bad and it's way easier when you have money to throw at problems

You've got more perspective, you probably panic less, you might have more flexibility/autonomy/authority in your career, and most people have more money.

I don't think it's the ideal, but I agree, in some ways it's probably easier than trying to figure it out when you're 25 and terrified of your boss and still pretty stupid and poor.


I didnt mean it in a negative way, was more trying to make the other guy feel better about himself haha.

I think anyone can do anything they really put their mind to.

I agree with your comments though. Maturity.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87384 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:31 pm to
well for clarification my wife had twins, if that wasn't obvious

When we went in for the first ultrasound we had a tech from a Muslim country and spoke very halting English, and she initially said "congratulations, a baby for you..." and then turned to me and said "and baby for you."

I thought it might be a poor translation of an Islamic tiding or something at first
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47624 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:36 pm to
This is all economics and feminism.

Women now pursue college and a career rather than starting a family in their 20’s and 30’s. She waits until she and her husband feel financially stable enough to have a kid and still live like ghetto rich spoiled assholes (or if she’s single, sees her relationship window closing as her child bearing years die off- IVF) then has a single baby late in life.

This is almost as bad as teen pregnancy. Less babies from the producer class, more spoiled arse kids, less nuclear families than ever.
Posted by LSUbub12
South Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
562 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:39 pm to
I’m 34 and the wife 32. We have a 3 and one year old. I hope we’re done!
Children are so expensive.
I’m already tired at 34, couldn’t imagine a newborn at 40.
I feel early 30’s was a good time for us to have our children as we were more secure in our careers and financially better off than in our 20’s.
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
17962 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:39 pm to
Hopefully less of the purple hair liberal whack jobs are procreating. I'd be for a bill to chemically castrate all liberal women. The world would be a happier place.
Posted by ArHog
Gulf Coast
Member since Jan 2008
39508 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

What do you think the government exists for


Damn sure not to subsidize day care because you've decided to procreate the world and can't afford it.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139058 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

More and more couples consider waiting to have kids in order to travel, work, or just to keep their lives calm before the chaos starts—and this idea is no longer taboo.
It was never "taboo," but it's not a great idea either. After 40, there's no room for error, and plenty of error in the room. Both medical complications and anomalies are significantly higher.
Posted by TigerBaitOohHaHa
Member since Jan 2023
2077 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:04 pm to
as someone who went through years of infertility in my 30's and read so many medical publications and books I should get an honorary medical degree... let me tell you that the odds of getting pregnant without medical intervention at the age of 40 are something like 5% and drops exponentially every year thereafter.

Hollywood loves to promote the Gwen Stefani, Selma Hyek, Kardashian pregnancy stories and fail to tell women that they had eggs frozen or an egg donor. It gives women the impression that its okay to delay having kids. Anyone who gets pregnant at 35 or older is considered a "Geriatric Pregnancy". Women's bodies are really meant to reproduce in their 20s.

I've told all of my kids that if they know they want a family, have a spouse and enough money to feed them, don't wait.

Plus, I think kids lives are enriched by knowing their grandparents..Much harder to if there are 40 year generations in a family.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28544 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:12 pm to
From a purely anecdotal vantage it seems like these fertility treatments have given rise to a surge in twins. Ten years ago none of my friends or family had twins and now they're all over the place. Some might be adopted as I was not aware the girl was pregnant until she suddenly started posting newborn pics online.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61456 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Plus, I think kids lives are enriched by knowing their grandparents..Much harder to if there are 40 year generations in a family.



This is what bums me out about having our last baby at 39. He wasn't planned, but having him has made me prioritize my health because I need to be around to help him with his kids someday. I'd love to have one more (now, after we thought we were done after 2) but I know the clock is ticking.
Posted by LaLadyinTx
Cypress, TX
Member since Nov 2018
7313 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

It gives women the impression that its okay to delay having kids. Anyone who gets pregnant at 35 or older is considered a "Geriatric Pregnancy". Women's bodies are really meant to reproduce in their 20s.

I've told all of my kids that if they know they want a family, have a spouse and enough money to feed them, don't wait.

Plus, I think kids lives are enriched by knowing their grandparents..Much harder to if there are 40 year generations in a family.


Very true. But there are plenty couples like my son and daughter in law who were trying for 8 years with no real reasons for infertility. They were both 27 when they first were "trying." They finally unexplainably got pregnant at 36 years old. Because by that point, my daughter in law ended up with other risk factors (both gestational diabetes and gestational hypertension), even if they could get pregnant again, they won't take the risk and I agree with their decision.

I was 25 when my first was born. They are much better parents in their late 30's than I was in my mid 20s. They are much more laid back, having seen their friends raise children and been around many more babies. They seem to handle the stress better. My hubs and I were terrified, stressed, mostly broke, and just not always great then.

I don't think advising folks to have babies at 20 (apparently like some posters did) is necessarily wise. Early 20s just doesn't make great parents.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram