- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Left cheered the murder of Ashli Babbitt but defends human trafficker Abrego Garcia
Posted on 6/7/25 at 5:36 pm to Harry Boutte
Posted on 6/7/25 at 5:36 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
You have to be an absolute moron to assault the very seat of the federal government
The government doesn’t get to shoot everyone who is a moron or you would’ve died years ago.
This post was edited on 6/7/25 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 6/7/25 at 5:41 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
I haven't seen
I've heard this is common for those with their heads up their asses
Posted on 6/7/25 at 5:43 pm to L.A.
quote:By that logic, the mayor of Newark and a congresswoman would be pushing up daisies right now.
So you approve of the police shooting unarmed trespassers if the trespassers refuse to disperse after being given a warning??
Posted on 6/8/25 at 1:45 am to beaux duke
That sounds like you advocate for the military to mow down these piece of shite rioters who are currently trying to forcibly stop a government agency from doing its job. Look forward to seeing you in future threads, demanding trump use the military already.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 4:27 pm to L.A.
quote:
human trafficker Abrego Garcia
I was wondering why this delay in bringing the case. I hate the source, but Slate definitely brings up some troubling points:
quote:
The charges against him may be valid. They may be exaggerated. Or they may be fabricated. It is far too soon to tell, and an indictment—which is notoriously easy to obtain—sheds little light on the matter. But already, there are at least five reasons to be skeptical that the government is acting in good faith and telling the truth about Abrego Garcia.
quote:
the government’s account of the 2022 traffic stop has shifted as well. In their indictment and motion for pretrial detention, prosecutors claim that Abrego Garcia lied to officers during the encounter, concealing that he was driving his passengers up from Texas. That allegation lies at the heart of the case: It ostensibly confirms that Abrego Garcia was dishonest about his actions and intentions, giving rise to a reasonable suspicion that he was covering up criminal activity. The allegation, though, appears to be false. According to a 2022 Department of Homeland Security referral report, he was driving his passengers from Texas to Maryland for construction work. This report thus contradicts the government’s new assertion that Abrego Garcia deceptively omitted the fact that his journey began in the Lone Star State.
quote:
prosecutors have now brought forth a raft of disturbing allegations about Abrego Garcia’s behavior, accusing him of regularly smuggling guns, transporting migrants for cash, and attempting to solicit child pornography. But it has provided literally no supporting evidence for its claims about child pornography, or even the scantest details about this eye-popping accusation. Meanwhile, its allegations about human smuggling rest entirely on Abrego Garcia’s alleged co-conspirators, who have since been imprisoned or deported. This kind of evidence is notoriously unreliable, in part because the government frequently offers deals—including payments, sentence reductions, or early release—to informants in exchange for inculpatory evidence.
And can someone from Tennessee opine on this one:
quote:
Ben Schrader, a high-ranking federal prosecutor in Tennessee, has resigned over his office’s conduct in this case, fearing that Abrego Garcia was targeted for political reasons. Schrader’s unusual move is a flashing red warning sign that something has gone terribly wrong in this case.
I've never heard of him. Is he an SJW or a serious jurist?
Slate
Posted on 6/10/25 at 4:33 pm to L.A.
They have no values, they’ll do a 180 on something they said yesterday if it grants them more power.
Popular
Back to top


1





