- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/19/20 at 2:44 pm to Quatre Pot
quote:
Supreme Court nominations must have something other than political weight. Remember, this person will be therefor life! Wanna see the results of a bad nominee? See John Roberts
NO MORE FEMALES! NO MORE DECISIONS BASED ON EMOTIONS RATHER THAN LAW!
Supreme Court Justices have to have honesty and integrity and a willingness to override their own preferences in favor of the original intent of the Constitution and the Law. A Judges duty is to interpret and apply the law as written and passed by the appropriate legislative body, NEVER to create new versions of the law. It is in their genetic makeup that many females, and Liberals in particular, are emotional creatures, they tend to choose to ignore the legal issues in favor of their own emotions and in so doing, they prove themselves unfit to render decisions based on law and logic. Any Judge or Supreme Court Justice who is willing to inject their own sympathies into their opinions, rather than rule strictly by the written law and the Constitution are totally unfit to serve.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 2:46 pm to cajunangelle
Are we sure that ACB isn’t an open borders Catholic? That pic scares me.
Virtually everyone I know (both personally and in public life like Romney, French, McCain) who has a family like that is a liberal open borders “Christian”
Virtually everyone I know (both personally and in public life like Romney, French, McCain) who has a family like that is a liberal open borders “Christian”
This post was edited on 9/19/20 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 9/19/20 at 2:47 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
They are all relatively attractive. It gets joked about a lot, but it’s a reality that there is a large attractiveness gap between liberals and conservatives.
Night and day re: Sotomayor and Kagan.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 9/19/20 at 2:49 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
there used to be a lot of Amy's family pics. I just checked google and bing they are hard to find, it is strange
Bet ones with her minority children will be damned near impossible to find
Posted on 9/19/20 at 3:09 pm to cajunangelle
I hope rushing is not chosen.
I wouldn’t mind Lagoa.
I wouldn’t mind Lagoa.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 3:21 pm to cajunangelle
quote:A special needs child and 2 adopted Haitian daughters. Can't wait to see the tolerant left scramble this into a woeful tale of white privilege and racism.
Amy Coney Barrett
Posted on 9/19/20 at 3:25 pm to cajunangelle
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/9/21 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 9/19/20 at 3:35 pm to EKG
quote:
And we have a winner.
quote:
Barrett's judicial philosophy has been likened to that of her mentor and former boss, Antonin Scalia.
I see your Clarence Thomas and raise you an Antonin Scalia.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 3:51 pm to cajunangelle
Nominate Lagoa for RBG’s seat. She is a woman and Latino so would be extremely difficult for the Dems to attack.
Then in 2nd term nominate ACB for Clarence Thomas’s seat.
Then in 2nd term nominate ACB for Clarence Thomas’s seat.
Posted on 9/19/20 at 4:18 pm to KillTheGophers
Heads will explode when Trump taps a African American staunch conservative female to the post.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 10:15 am to cajunangelle
quote:
.. I have seen a few that don't think a woman should be SCOTUS because of their 'emotions.' I argued with one last night...
Women make good leaders. It isn't always a man needed to be a SCOTUS.
I support women being on the court. My criteria for a court appointment does not include race, sex, creed, or even sexual orientation.
I'm just saying that Trump has just made it clear that anyone with a cock is disqualified.
Isn't that unconstitutional discrimination of the worst kind?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)