- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The fundamental issue with the Epstein case is protecting pedophiles.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 11:43 am to Rip Torn
Posted on 7/9/25 at 11:43 am to Rip Torn
quote:
You are a complete moron. You keep pretending all of these nefarious people are being protected by Trump with literally no proof whatsoever other than vague social media posts. You also have no idea who has or has not been arrested that is associated with the Epstein case. You don’t have a right to know everything in life no matter how much you claim you do. It could very well be the victims don’t want it released but you still claim to some naive scenario where countless higher ups are arrested in some massive sting.
Sounds like something a pedo would say.
0
Posted on 7/9/25 at 11:46 am to Rip Torn
quote:
You are a complete moron. You keep pretending all of these nefarious people are being protected by Trump with literally no proof whatsoever other than vague social media posts. You also have no idea who has or has not been arrested that is associated with the Epstein case. You don’t have a right to know everything in life no matter how much you claim you do. It could very well be the victims don’t want it released but you still claim to some naive scenario where countless higher ups are arrested in some massive sting.
Don’t piss on my head and tell me it’s raining. I’m usually a lurker on this board, but this is total bullshite.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 11:50 am to GumboPot
Can we come to grips with the reality that intelligence communities, including our own, exploit young females and have done so for centuries and probably always will?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 11:58 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Can we come to grips with the reality that intelligence communities, including our own, exploit young females and have done so for centuries and probably always will?
It’s a sad state of affairs when this has to be admitted.
Parents, protect your kids.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:03 pm to GumboPot
I think the fundamental issue is that the Epstein case is about protecting intelligence agencies who were using children to compromise people.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:07 pm to GumboPot
quote:
when this has to be admitted.
The spy business is ugly and there are no rules including using biology against the target, which can include dangling a young fertile female in front of a male to bait him in.
That's like putting a fresh steak in a Tiger's face.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:07 pm to GumboPot
The Epstein case is also the most unavoidable example of a two-tiered justice system proving that we are not a nation of laws. The rules only exist for the poor.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:11 pm to Pecos Pedro
quote:
low rent political subforum of an SEC football website
Look folks, one of those arrogant Tejas fans Aggie was warning us about...
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:11 pm to kingbob
It’s the same thing with the Catholic Church and the pedo priests and subsequent coverup.
People expect people in positions of power/money to get away with stuff. Stealing money, getting caught with prostitutes, DUI, etc.
But pedophilia is on another level. The sexual abuse of a child. No one with any good in their heart want this type of crime swept under the rug no matter who they are.
People expect people in positions of power/money to get away with stuff. Stealing money, getting caught with prostitutes, DUI, etc.
But pedophilia is on another level. The sexual abuse of a child. No one with any good in their heart want this type of crime swept under the rug no matter who they are.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:21 pm to GumboPot
quote:
don't see how Pam, Kash, Dan and Donald can live with themselves.
Not a pro or con comment on this but something that popped into my head the other day when the no list news hit… what prosecutable evidence exists without Epstein or Maxwell to corroborate it or give it context.
The other thing that comes up is the old saying “if you going to take a swing at the king you better hit him.” In other words releasing a list of names to the public without concrete prosecutable proof could be a tremendous libel burden. If you release info that ruins somebody and you cant back it up the the lawsuits will be massive.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:28 pm to dickkellog
quote:
pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children, that's not what happened here.
se
We don't know that, theres just no proof of it. CIA, Mossad, Podesta, obama hotdogs, clintons, Haiti there is alot of smoke of missing children and the deepstate. I agree we haven't seen anything linking Epstein to such but if he was deepstate and his job was sexual exploitation of powerful people then I wouldn't be surprised if there were young kids abused on his island. I feel like if Hillary wanted a 8 year old girl Epstein would provide it.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:28 pm to bbvdd
Your reading comprehension is only surpassed by your intelligence lol she helped him find and entice underage girls. How many times are you goofballs going to make this same idiotic argument?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:29 pm to LSUbacchus81
quote:
Why has Trump not fired Bondi yet?
Please explain why he should. Most bosses don't fire people for doing what they are told to do.
The press conference yesterday should have clued you into the fact that Trump is done with the Epstein issue and he doesn't give a shite who likes or dislikes it.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:30 pm to Pandy Fackler
No I don’t see what you mean because you lack all common sense so I would have to find a Stargate and return as a preteen girl to “see your point”
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:32 pm to OccamsStubble
He is doing his job quite well. I didn’t vote a President based off of some vague references to a list that may or may not exist. If you did, then that was dumb or did your imaginary scenario have Bill Clinton getting arrested lol
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:34 pm to dickkellog
Nobody wants to get into that because it makes you feel gross to draw those lines, but it's probably really really relevant here.
People have run around with this story for a decade conflating this with their worst conspiracies about satanic child sacrifice/abuse/pizzagate stuff.
If it were that, and thankfully there is no evidence it was, the lines would be starker. If Giuffre testified she saw Clinton and Maxwell and Epstein having dinner with two 12 year olds, the landscape obviously very different. But I don't think that's what Epstein was doing nor what someone like Clinton was into, and I'm guessing those lines ("were they 16? Were they 19?") have pretty significant impact in what law enforcement would be able to do after the fact with a lot of evidence (videos, photos) but potentially a lot of unidentified victims.
I don't care if someone wants to call Clinton a pedophile, but I don't think it's accurate and that type of stuff is probably contributing to why people have developed outsized expectations for the Epstein saga.
People have run around with this story for a decade conflating this with their worst conspiracies about satanic child sacrifice/abuse/pizzagate stuff.
If it were that, and thankfully there is no evidence it was, the lines would be starker. If Giuffre testified she saw Clinton and Maxwell and Epstein having dinner with two 12 year olds, the landscape obviously very different. But I don't think that's what Epstein was doing nor what someone like Clinton was into, and I'm guessing those lines ("were they 16? Were they 19?") have pretty significant impact in what law enforcement would be able to do after the fact with a lot of evidence (videos, photos) but potentially a lot of unidentified victims.
I don't care if someone wants to call Clinton a pedophile, but I don't think it's accurate and that type of stuff is probably contributing to why people have developed outsized expectations for the Epstein saga.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:39 pm to GumboPot
Yup , all the neo cons on here telling us to move on are no better than the abusers and may be closeted pedos themselves
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:41 pm to GumboPot
Its all good guys. The FBI and CIA are here to protect the average American citizen...
Posted on 7/9/25 at 12:47 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
If you release info that ruins somebody and you cant back it up the the lawsuits will be massive.
I’m no expert, but . . .
If the feds release info, a libel claim would have to go through the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Best I recall, you can’t hold the government liable for a “discretionary function.”
So unless some law or reg requires them to withhold it, they are immune from liability for releasing the info because it is “discretionary.”
Posted on 7/9/25 at 2:24 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
If the feds release info, a libel claim would have to go through the Federal Tort Claims Act.
The problem with this is that without Epstein or Maxwell there is little to no case and therefore the govt has no reason to release the info and put persons to ridicule. If that was part of prosecution of a case then its open season on what falls out.
To release inflammatory information without legal cause would be with malice.
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News