- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Epstein gaslighting is unreal
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:01 am to AGGIES
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:01 am to AGGIES
quote:
Is that clip real?
This is were we are heading. With the rise of AI and hyperrealistic computer imaging, the plot of the latest “Mission Impossible” doesn’t seem so outlandish.
Reagan era CIA Director Willam Casey is apocryphally quoted as saying “We will know the CIA’s mission is complete when the American people don’t know what to believe.”
Whatever the veracity of that attribution, we long ago have passed that threshold. Yet here is an extended cut from Patel’s interview on the GB Show:
This post was edited on 7/11/25 at 8:15 am
1
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:03 am to FLTech
quote:
When she said that she had everything on her desk.. she meant that she had everything in possession that the previous FBI gave her on her desk and dumb stupid fricking morons like you actually believed that she had thousands of videos of celebrities, politicians, etc actually fricking underage people on tape sitting on her desk.
So when Pam Bondi declared she was going to release the flight logs and the names of the “codefendants” who visited Epstein Island, you have proved — through geometric logic — that it instead meant Bondi was saying she was hungry enough to eat a cow?
Got it.
I’m glad you have explained it for us dumb fricking morons!
VIDEO LINK: AG Pam Bondi reveals Epstein files info should be released 'tomorrow'
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:08 am to Toomer Deplorable
Glenn Beck guaranteed it would be released the minute kash was confirmed
Now hes complaining
Now hes complaining
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:19 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Glenn Beck guaranteed it would be released the minute kash was confirmed
So Glenn Beck’s “complaining” about Kash Patel’s 180° turn on the L’affaire Epstein is the main problem here?
I suppose this issue is like a Rorschach Blot.
Different people see different things.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:24 am to Toomer Deplorable
Glenn Beck embarrassed himself. He talked up a big guarantee like everyone else. He said he knew inside info. Hes always been fos
He shouldnt say anything
He shouldnt say anything
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:55 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Yes. Nothing material will ever come of any of it.
From an outside entity holding blackmail material? How the hell would you know? I don’t think they’re going to include you in the communications.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 6:58 am to DyeHardDylan
You should know what gaslighting looks like, you do plenty of it defending the policy and actions of the democrats.
By the way, the way this Epstein issue has been handled is bullshite, but you complaining about gaslighting is ironic and hilarious.
By the way, the way this Epstein issue has been handled is bullshite, but you complaining about gaslighting is ironic and hilarious.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:14 am to Flats
And how do you know there is an outside entity holding blackmail material? Did they include you in their communications?
is it only ok for you to just say things on a message board as though you speak from authority on the matter? All anyone is doing is guessing. Everyone is free to theorize, but no one here actually knows anything.
is it only ok for you to just say things on a message board as though you speak from authority on the matter? All anyone is doing is guessing. Everyone is free to theorize, but no one here actually knows anything.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:35 am to Metaloctopus
quote:
And how do you know there is an outside entity holding blackmail material? Did they include you in their communications?
If you would read all the posts in this conversation you would understand that I never claimed to know anything. He responded to a post of mine where I said "IF" there was backmail involved.
Given Epstein's background I think it's fairly obvious that Israel was involved, but you may not know anything about his background. I would hope most rational people can agree that at a bare minimum blackmail was almost certainly involved, unless you think a townhouse full of hidden cameras is normal. The only question now is what happened to the blackmail material.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:38 am to DyeHardDylan
Does a list of those who went for sex with trafficked or groomed girls exist separately from just a list of people who jumped at the chance to hang out with a billionaire?
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:38 am to idlewatcher
quote:There are people who think EVERYTHING Trump does is good, just like there are people who think EVERYTHING Trump does is bad. I wish we could get rid of both groups.
I’m surprised all of MAGA isn’t onboard with calling BS on Trump
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:47 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:Yes it is. And it is unacceptable.
The Epstein gaslighting is unreal
Meet the New Swamp. Same as the Old Swamp.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:51 am to idlewatcher
quote:Hence the announcement of the Brennan and Comey investigations that in the end, will also yield nothing.
“move on there are more important things to deal with”
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:53 am to Flats
quote:
If you would read all the posts in this conversation you would understand that I never claimed to know anything. He responded to a post of mine where I said "IF" there was backmail involved.
It's not necessary that I read all your posts in order to notice the clear hypocrisy in what you said to the other poster. He didn't say he "knew" anything, either. He's stating his belief that nothing will come of it, and you are stating your belief that blackmail is involved. So why do you get say to someone "how would you know", when the same question applies to you? I think that is a more than fair question I am asking, that does not require any further context.
quote:
Given Epstein's background I think it's fairly obvious that Israel was involved, but you may not know anything about his background. I would hope most rational people can agree that at a bare minimum blackmail was almost certainly involved, unless you think a townhouse full of hidden cameras is normal. The only question now is what happened to the blackmail material.
Epstein's background is that he knew and had dealings with a lot of rich people from all over. I'm not sure where you are making this almost certain connection that you seem to believe you have with Israel. Do I think a townhouse full of hidden cameras is normal? For a person who was doing the kinds of things he was doing, yes, I can't imagine how it could come as a surprise to anyone that he had hidden cameras everywhere. What, specifically, does this have to do with Israel?
Is there blackmail involved in this coverup? Well there would logically only seem to be two possibilities: Either someone, or several people are being blackmailed, or the DOJ is actively hiding information on their own volition. Based on what we have seen in the past, why should we just assume that the DOJ needs to be blackmailed to cover something up. I think both possibilities are quite strong. What I think is less strong, is your hypothesis that Israel is behind any blackmail.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:53 am to DyeHardDylan
What I'm bothered by is that Trump was someone who was almost eliminated by the Deep State and is supposed to the force against it, yet I feel like he's giving into someone or something when that is out of character for him. He's normally the resistance, which is why the media and everyone on Capitol Hill hates him. He can't be controlled by money or power like others.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 7:59 am to Metaloctopus
quote:
It's not necessary that I read all your posts in order to notice the clear hypocrisy in what you said to the other poster.
It's not hypocrisy, mensa. I'll do the reader's digest version.
Me: If blackmail is involved that's bad.
Him: Nothing material will come from it.
Me: You wouldn't have any way of knowing if something material came from blackmail.
That's not hypocrisy, it's discussing a hypothetical.
quote:
Epstein's background is that he knew and had dealings with a lot of rich people from all over.
There are a few more clues in his background besides that.
quote:
What I think is less strong, is your hypothesis that Israel is behind any blackmail.
Go read his Wiki page, then start reading the pages of all the bigwigs he interacted with and the guys who paved the way for him to go from college dropout lying about his credentials so he could teach to billionaire. If you still think there's nothing there, then we process information differently.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 8:04 am to Indefatigable
quote:
It just doesn’t matter. He’s dead.
Dumb
Posted on 7/11/25 at 8:06 am to DyeHardDylan
Well Pam sucks.
But in that clip she was asked about the client list her answer was it’s on my desk waiting to be reviewed. She then says the same about the jfk and mlk files.
So no, I don’t believe the client list was just sitting on her desk.
She’s probably used that line throughout her career.
Yeah the report is on my desk, I’ll get right on it.
But in that clip she was asked about the client list her answer was it’s on my desk waiting to be reviewed. She then says the same about the jfk and mlk files.
So no, I don’t believe the client list was just sitting on her desk.
She’s probably used that line throughout her career.
Yeah the report is on my desk, I’ll get right on it.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 8:11 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Glenn Beck embarrassed himself.
Now do Pam Bondi and Kash Patel. They not only have embarrassed themselves, they ultimately have disgraced Trump.
Posted on 7/11/25 at 8:13 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
They not only have embarrassed themselves, they ultimately have disgraced Trump.
How do we know they're not following orders?
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News