Started By
Message

re: The dozens of Epstein victims…why dont they name names?

Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:00 pm to
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3397 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

trying to get funds

quote:

wanted a meeting

is different from
quote:

what kind of funds were given



The Washington Times first reported on the email exchange Tuesday, emphasizing that Epstein had already been convicted as a sex offender in 2008 and was facing mounting lawsuits by 2013. The documents do not show evidence of Jeffries meeting Epstein or of Epstein donating in response to the solicitation. It is also unclear if Epstein responded to the email.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
91895 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:01 pm to
I'm kind of surprised not a single one of those ladies named Trump as an offender a la Blasey Ford. You'd think the dems would've wrangled at least one to claim it.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
12781 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

I'm kind of surprised not a single one of those ladies named Trump as an offender a la Blasey Ford. You'd think the dems would've wrangled at least one to claim it.


Maybe they understand that the E Jean Carrols and BlaseyFords are very unconvincing and tend to backfire in the real world.

I'd also imagine Trump's whereabouts on any given day since the 80s is recorded somewhere meticulously.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
15779 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

The point is to expose the fact that our intelligence community abetted Epstein in statutory rape crimes, at a minimum. Probably abetted Epstein in a lot more crimes.


OK, and then what?
Posted by Sassafrasology
Member since Nov 2025
264 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

OK, and then what?



LINK
Posted by Jugbow
Member since Nov 2025
46 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

The dozens of Epstein victims…why dont they name names?


They either signed an NDA or got paid off.

Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16046 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

The Washington Times first reported on the email exchange Tuesday, emphasizing that Epstein had already been convicted as a sex offender in 2008 and was facing mounting lawsuits by 2013. The documents do not show evidence of Jeffries meeting Epstein or of Epstein donating in response to the solicitation. It is also unclear if Epstein responded to the email.


“Does not show evidence of”

“It is also unclear”

So #1: You are completely excusing Jeffries from reaching out to the convicted sex offender for donations and a possible meet. That’s cool. If I’m incorrect just chime in. Juuust place it in the don’t care bin and soldier on?

And #2: shouldn’t we get confirmations of “does not show evidence of” and “it is also unclear”. We not going to clear it up? Just leave it as unclear? Unknown? Uninterested?

I mean… this is serious stuff and we need answers. Right?

Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
6058 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:19 pm to
I would like to start with the Trump administration appointees who talked about epstien for years before being appointed. Kash, Bondi, Bongino.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21260 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:


Should clear a lot of this up.


are you aware the most recent victim to name names was just off'd this last summer?
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67225 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:23 pm to
They did name some dude in the fashion industry for some involvement with Epstein , but not necessarily that he got his knob polished
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
15779 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

LINK


So abolish the FBI and CIA? Ok, that's obviously not going to happen. They are both obviously terrible organizations that only betray the American taxpayer and should be reigned in (FBI) and abolished (CIA), but not because of this stupid Epstein bullshite.
Posted by Sunnyvale
Member since Feb 2024
2095 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

They got big settlements with NDA's perhaps.


So, there is a story about a "Fund" they all draw from, if they signed the NDA.

"If they chose to speak out, then they dont get access to it"
This was part of their agreement.


Your 100% spot on on this one.
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
22810 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Of course the ones we don't know, who are being quiet aren't the ones I'm speaking about.

However, these brave and powerful women who ARE getting their 15 minutes- they are brave enough to name names. That would be justice not only for themselves but for the victims still in the shadows.

But no... instead they are making Glossy PSAs and hob nobbing with politicians and doing interviews.



You're talking about poor teenaged girls who were being recruited from literal Florida trailer parks according to some older articles I found; it's not like they were going to know or be able to identify every old rich guy at Epstein's house.

Maxwell and a couple of assistants were probably the only ones who knew anything besides Epstein and his accomplices who were trying to cover for themselves.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26237 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:55 pm to

quote:

why dont they name names?


Probably has something to do with the desire to keep breathing.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
12781 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

it's not like they were going to know or be able to identify every old rich guy at Epstein's house.


How about just one or two?

Wait.. hold up... these Victims SAID they can name names.

Are you accusing them of lying?

Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
24896 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

So, there is a story about a "Fund" they all draw from, if they signed the NDA.

"If they chose to speak out, then they dont get access to it"
This was part of their agreement.


Your 100% spot on on this one.


Stormy Daniels violated her NDA terms and had to repay the money she got.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
12781 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Probably has something to do with the desire to keep breathing.


If they were scared of that, they wouldn't get in front of the cameras and draw attention to themselves and threaten/ promise to name names.

They are fearful.... of losing money.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
91895 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

They did name some dude in the fashion industry for some involvement with Epstein , but not necessarily that he got his knob polished



Les Wexnar IIRC

He is (or was depending on if he's still alive) a key to this whole situation IMO.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3397 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

You are completely excusing Jeffries

Jesus, you're fricking worthless. Nowhere did I excuse anyone.

In our country, you need to provide evidence to prove someone guilty.
quote:

We not going to clear it up? Just leave it as unclear? Unknown? Uninterested?

I mean… this is serious stuff and we need answers. Right?

Show us a copy of the letter you sent to your congressman demanding an investigation.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
7706 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

In our country, you need to provide evidence to prove someone guilty.


not if you are a democrat
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram