- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The dozens of Epstein victims…why dont they name names?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:00 pm to CleverUserName
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:00 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
trying to get funds
quote:
wanted a meeting
is different from
quote:
what kind of funds were given
The Washington Times first reported on the email exchange Tuesday, emphasizing that Epstein had already been convicted as a sex offender in 2008 and was facing mounting lawsuits by 2013. The documents do not show evidence of Jeffries meeting Epstein or of Epstein donating in response to the solicitation. It is also unclear if Epstein responded to the email.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:01 pm to SallysHuman
I'm kind of surprised not a single one of those ladies named Trump as an offender a la Blasey Ford. You'd think the dems would've wrangled at least one to claim it.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:05 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
I'm kind of surprised not a single one of those ladies named Trump as an offender a la Blasey Ford. You'd think the dems would've wrangled at least one to claim it.
Maybe they understand that the E Jean Carrols and BlaseyFords are very unconvincing and tend to backfire in the real world.
I'd also imagine Trump's whereabouts on any given day since the 80s is recorded somewhere meticulously.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:06 pm to Sassafrasology
quote:
The point is to expose the fact that our intelligence community abetted Epstein in statutory rape crimes, at a minimum. Probably abetted Epstein in a lot more crimes.
OK, and then what?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:11 pm to dnm3305
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:12 pm to Cosmo
quote:
The dozens of Epstein victims…why dont they name names?
They either signed an NDA or got paid off.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:15 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
The Washington Times first reported on the email exchange Tuesday, emphasizing that Epstein had already been convicted as a sex offender in 2008 and was facing mounting lawsuits by 2013. The documents do not show evidence of Jeffries meeting Epstein or of Epstein donating in response to the solicitation. It is also unclear if Epstein responded to the email.
“Does not show evidence of”
“It is also unclear”
So #1: You are completely excusing Jeffries from reaching out to the convicted sex offender for donations and a possible meet. That’s cool. If I’m incorrect just chime in. Juuust place it in the don’t care bin and soldier on?
And #2: shouldn’t we get confirmations of “does not show evidence of” and “it is also unclear”. We not going to clear it up? Just leave it as unclear? Unknown? Uninterested?
I mean… this is serious stuff and we need answers. Right?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:19 pm to SDVTiger
I would like to start with the Trump administration appointees who talked about epstien for years before being appointed. Kash, Bondi, Bongino.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:23 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Should clear a lot of this up.
are you aware the most recent victim to name names was just off'd this last summer?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:23 pm to Cosmo
They did name some dude in the fashion industry for some involvement with Epstein , but not necessarily that he got his knob polished
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:36 pm to Sassafrasology
quote:
LINK
So abolish the FBI and CIA? Ok, that's obviously not going to happen. They are both obviously terrible organizations that only betray the American taxpayer and should be reigned in (FBI) and abolished (CIA), but not because of this stupid Epstein bullshite.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:41 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
They got big settlements with NDA's perhaps.
So, there is a story about a "Fund" they all draw from, if they signed the NDA.
"If they chose to speak out, then they dont get access to it"
This was part of their agreement.
Your 100% spot on on this one.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:54 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Of course the ones we don't know, who are being quiet aren't the ones I'm speaking about.
However, these brave and powerful women who ARE getting their 15 minutes- they are brave enough to name names. That would be justice not only for themselves but for the victims still in the shadows.
But no... instead they are making Glossy PSAs and hob nobbing with politicians and doing interviews.
You're talking about poor teenaged girls who were being recruited from literal Florida trailer parks according to some older articles I found; it's not like they were going to know or be able to identify every old rich guy at Epstein's house.
Maxwell and a couple of assistants were probably the only ones who knew anything besides Epstein and his accomplices who were trying to cover for themselves.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:55 pm to Cosmo
quote:
why dont they name names?
Probably has something to do with the desire to keep breathing.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:56 pm to PowerTool
quote:
it's not like they were going to know or be able to identify every old rich guy at Epstein's house.
How about just one or two?
Wait.. hold up... these Victims SAID they can name names.
Are you accusing them of lying?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:01 pm to Sunnyvale
quote:
So, there is a story about a "Fund" they all draw from, if they signed the NDA.
"If they chose to speak out, then they dont get access to it"
This was part of their agreement.
Your 100% spot on on this one.
Stormy Daniels violated her NDA terms and had to repay the money she got.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:03 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Probably has something to do with the desire to keep breathing.
If they were scared of that, they wouldn't get in front of the cameras and draw attention to themselves and threaten/ promise to name names.
They are fearful.... of losing money.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:04 pm to VOR
quote:
They did name some dude in the fashion industry for some involvement with Epstein , but not necessarily that he got his knob polished
Les Wexnar IIRC
He is (or was depending on if he's still alive) a key to this whole situation IMO.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:04 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
You are completely excusing Jeffries
Jesus, you're fricking worthless. Nowhere did I excuse anyone.
In our country, you need to provide evidence to prove someone guilty.
quote:
We not going to clear it up? Just leave it as unclear? Unknown? Uninterested?
I mean… this is serious stuff and we need answers. Right?
Show us a copy of the letter you sent to your congressman demanding an investigation.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:06 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
In our country, you need to provide evidence to prove someone guilty.
not if you are a democrat
Popular
Back to top


1









