- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Dems baited Trump, and he took it, hook, line and sinker
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:49 am to Perfect Circle
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:49 am to Perfect Circle
quote:
Some Democratic Congressional leaders made a general statement about illegal orders (a policy already in place)
They made a video in response to National Guard personnel being ordered into metropolitan areas to assist local law enforcement in police actions. Context is everything and you are deliberately ignoring context.
They are essentially encouraging active duty military personnel to ignore orders that they (the Democrats) disagree with.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:50 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
What illegal orders?
Not a necessary distinction.
Their comment was a general one.
quote:
See? Therein lies the problem. There are no illegal orders.
No it's not a problem.
Saying "you must follow the law and Constitution" doesn't require a specific violate to still be true.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:51 am to Perfect Circle
quote:
Some Democratic Congressional leaders made a general statement about illegal orders
Trump said what any president would say in that situation. I’m sure those congressmen will be there to support LCpl Shmuckatelli when he’s tossed in the brig for listening to their stupid asses
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 8:53 am
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:51 am to Perfect Circle
They told active duty soldiers to disobey their superiors. Everything he said was fine by me. They hide behind ILLEGAL orders. Who the frick are they to determine what is legal or illegal? Left leaning clowns think anything they disagree with is racist or illegal.
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 8:53 am
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
thinks the dems are brilliant for this strategy
no surprise
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:52 am to ChanceOfRainIsNever
quote:
Trump said what any president would say in that situation.
No other president would have threatened them with death, other than possibly Lincoln.
He's his own worst enemy.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:52 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Don’t you have some cock to swallow somewhere?
Another one of those latent homosexual responses.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:53 am to Perfect Circle
He’s really not an enemy. The problem is that Washington and the deep state political machine, made up of democrats and republicans, are the enemy of the people of the United States.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:54 am to Perfect Circle
quote:
He is his own worst enemy.
:wrong:
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Saying "you must follow the law and Constitution" doesn't require a specific violate to still be true.
What if "they" begin to refuse orders "they" deem are illegal? And who determines "they" are engaging in illegal activity refusing legal orders? Who adjudicates that? And will it take longer than the 2026 elections?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:56 am to Perfect Circle
quote:
The Dems baited Trump, and he took it, hook, line and sinker
Oh man... he is done now. Is his resignation press conference scheduled for 9:00am?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:59 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Who adjudicates that?
Prosecutors and courts.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not a necessary distinction.
They ain't accusing Trump of issuing legal orders
So yeah, it's a necessary distinction.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:01 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
So yeah, it's a necessary distinction.
quote:
Saying "you must follow the law and Constitution" doesn't require a specific violate to still be true.
*ETA: I'm not editing the typo
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 9:02 am
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:01 am to KCT
quote:
Keep trying.
Better yet don’t.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:02 am to Perfect Circle
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:03 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
SlowFlowPro
thinks the dems are brilliant for this strategy
Why do you lie so much?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What illegal orders? Not a necessary distinction.
C’mon, man - you know better than that. The insinuation was that there were orders that were illegal. It makes the military question the orders that have been given - and is more damaging when those making the accusation know those orders weren’t illegal in the first place. It was a direct effort to undermine the chain of command.
This is the same tactic used by Dems stating that donations were made by “Jeffrey Epstein” to those on Trump’s staff - knowing full well it wasn’t “that” Jeffrey Epstein.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No other president would have threatened them with death, other than possibly Lincoln.
I know you hate the guy Roger but other than Lincoln I can’t think of a president who has had members of congress openly advocating for the military to mutiny against him. What else is he supposed to do just sit there and say nothing?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
Deleted - double
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 10:54 am
Popular
Back to top


0








