re: The CEO of the company with the missing sub refused to hire qualified crew

quote:

---

They should have hired a qualified engineer first, then a qualified/approved crew.

---

Exactly. Wouldn't have mattered who was piloting the thing.

He paid for that mistake with his life.

quote:

---

He paid for that mistake with his life.

---

Unfortunately so did a few underwater tourists who trusted the wrong eccentric billionaire. Would been more fitting if the guy went down solo.

quote:

---

because 50 year old white guys are't inspirational."

---

Also 50 year old white guys who understand what is involved would not get in that thing.

Hire a Navy Sub guy and hand him a Play Station controller and he’s walking out.

quote:

---

quote:
I’m sure this is coming to an airline near you.


Why would you think that?

Just because the FAA director doesn't know what a stall is?

But he hires trans people, so he knows what he is doing

---

Clearly, DEI is more important that intelligence!

I bet he was wishing he had one of those crackers with him a few days ago.

This is how you dumb fricks are spinning this? Looks to me more like “anti-regulation rich guy fires qualified engineer after safety issues broached, ignoring known structural inadequacies of submarine, effectively murdering his clients and killing himself: previously claims regarding submarine design by said anti-regulation rich guy, ‘You know, at some point, safety just is pure waste. I mean if you just want to be safe, don't get out of bed, don't get in your car, don't do anything. At some point, you're going to take some risk, and it really is a risk/reward question. I think I can do this just as safely by breaking the rules.’”