- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Team Flynn filed their opposition to Judge Sullivan's request for rehearing *Update Pg. 6*
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:49 am
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:49 am
8
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:52 am to cajunangelle
Should be denied.
The Overton Window has shifted under OMB. All previous "shoulds" hold no water today.
The Overton Window has shifted under OMB. All previous "shoulds" hold no water today.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:52 am to cajunangelle
When does DOJ file theirs?
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:52 am to cajunangelle
The second he is free and clear he can talk / sue about what actually happened in public, he has the evidence to prove it, and he has the backing of the president to do so. The dems would be stupid not to delay delay delay until the last second, because we all know it implicates Biden directly.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:53 am to teke184
the weird things you find in court cases...
like the Evaporated Milk Association
like the Evaporated Milk Association
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:01 am to cajunangelle
With the withdrawal of the DoJ from the case, it's almost as if the judge is now the case's prosecutor. That's scary.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:03 am to LSURussian
Judge Sullivan thinks he is Judge Dredd.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:05 am to cajunangelle
why hasnt this judge been disbarred yet? seriously 
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:17 am to keakar
This is, by all accounts, an irrelevant process crime. That a federal judge would be so determined to keep it alive when both the government and the Defendant agree a crime cannot be proven is proof that this is a political hit job.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:24 am to keakar
quote:Why should he?
why hasnt this judge been disbarred yet? seriously
Please cite the specific Rules of Professional Responsibility that you assert him to have violated and outline the facts which you believe would support disbarment.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:30 am to SCLibertarian
quote:...or worse.
proof that this is a political hit job.
I'm assuming at this point Sullivan is somehow directly compromised. There really is no other explanation for his conduct that I can ascertain.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Why should he?
Jesus Christ. You're not even trying anymore.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:39 am to VoxDawg
quote:We get it. You Trump loyalists hate the guy. Me? I don't care much and have not really followed the Flynn thing.quote:Jesus Christ. You're not even trying anymore.
Why should he?
But if you are going to call for disbarment, the burden lies with YOU to elucidate the reasons that you think such a penalty would be justified.
And "OMB" is not a basis for disbarment.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:39 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
I'm assuming at this point Sullivan is somehow directly compromised. There really is no other explanation for his conduct that I can ascertain.
Yeah unless he has some corrupt involvement in this case there is no reason for him to care about this case.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:
elucidate the reasons that you think such a penalty would be justified.
Ignoring his responsibility as the judge and choosing to prosecute the case in light of the DOJ moving to drop charges might be a start.
MIGHT.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:48 am to VoxDawg
quote:AGAIN, exactly which provision of the Code of Professional Responsibility to you contend that he has violated.
Ignoring his responsibility as the judge and choosing to prosecute the case in light of the DOJ moving to drop charges might be a start.
Your statement might as well be a complaint about his selection of neckties.
Maybe his actions in this case (or his necktie collection) would be a valid reason to criticize him. But the post that started this discussion is not just a criticism ... it is a demand for disbarment. That is a somewhat higher standard.
The saddest part of this discussion is that some (dim)wit will begin asserting that I support Sullivan, when I have clearly stated that I do not care ... one way or the other. Here, simply requesting that a poster provide legitimate support for his position apparently constitutes "support" for the opposing position. Sad.
This post was edited on 7/20/20 at 10:52 am
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Please cite the specific Rules of Professional Responsibility that you assert him to have violated and outline the facts which you believe would support disbarment.
he has created a conflict of interest
not disbarment-worthy, most likely, but it's a serious offense
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:52 am to AggieHank86
Thankfully, I don't have to make the case. Sidney Powell is doing a masterful job of it.
Of course, since you admittedly haven't been following the case, you have proven yourself not worthy of engaging, so I'll leave you to the pretty pictures.
Of course, since you admittedly haven't been following the case, you have proven yourself not worthy of engaging, so I'll leave you to the pretty pictures.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:56 am to VoxDawg
So, you post a bunch of (someone's) opinion about the legitimacy of his rulings.
The remedy for bad rulings is appeal, not disbarment. So, "you got nothing." Unsurprising.
The remedy for bad rulings is appeal, not disbarment. So, "you got nothing." Unsurprising.
This post was edited on 7/20/20 at 10:58 am
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:58 am to cajunangelle
How about standing? When does a judge have standing in a case that is before him? Clown show
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News