- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Taliban has taken Kabul. Terrorist attack at Airport at least 12 marines confirmed killed
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:35 pm to Pettifogger
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:35 pm to Pettifogger
Austin is visibly flustered now, he may have to leave this press conference early... These are people put in charge of our fricking military! China licking their chops right now!
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:35 pm to tiger91
He had no answer for that.
Bagram would have provided operational security, air cover, helos and air cover.
Would have made for a more secure operational environment.
Bagram would have provided operational security, air cover, helos and air cover.
Would have made for a more secure operational environment.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:35 pm to LegendInMyMind
Legend how would people get to Bagram?? (sp?)
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:35 pm to tiger91
quote:
Can someone explain this to me how it'd help?
From what I have read and seen the biggest thing is that Bagram would be easier for people to get to and easier to keep secure. Also, if need be people could be rescued from roofs rather just on the tarmac basically.
*That's my limited knowledge.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:35 pm to Lsut81
Who was the commander on the ground at Baghram who said we needed to leave under the dark at night without telling anyone. I want to hear from that military commander now to see if this is true or false
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:36 pm to Conman23
I wanna see Biden answer all these questions
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:36 pm to Conman23
Reporter calling them out about not thinking the country would fall by saying Taliban was taking territory weeks ago

Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:36 pm to Tllsu
Press having a field day today. Just getting worse
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:36 pm to Conman23
I have zero idea of proximity in all of this ... easier to get to would be good but too late now.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:37 pm to tiger91
quote:
Legend how would people get to Bagram?? (sp?)
It isn't very far from Kabul, if I remember correctly. It isn't walking distance, but it isn't across the country, either.
It isn't just the logistics of moving people. It is everything else a secure US Airbase would offer, as stated above. We likely wouldn't be in this scenario if Bagram were still up and running, even with a skeleton crew.
This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:38 pm to Tllsu
quote:
Press having a field day today. Just getting worse
It's amazing watching the press actually do their fricking jobs and hold democrats' feet to the fire for their epic frickup.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:38 pm to BallsEleven
Austin blaming State Dept for processing.
It's absolutely an issue but let's be real.... You're relying on American's being protected by using Diplomacy with the frickING Taliban!
It's absolutely an issue but let's be real.... You're relying on American's being protected by using Diplomacy with the frickING Taliban!
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:38 pm to tiger91
Afghans trying to get to the airport and being shot is apparently "unfortunate incidents" now according to Austin.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:38 pm to Tllsu
quote:
Press having a field day today. Just getting worse
Proof they still know how to be journalists/reporters when they choose to. They only care because they have a personal stake in this. Miley’s gonna be like “get all the journalists out first so we don’t have to take anymore questions.”
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:39 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
It would give us another secure, more easily defensible airport with a greater capability of moving more people. It would allow for a separation of civilian vs diplomatic evac.
We also likely would have left more helicopters there which would be quite useful in getting to people that cannot get to the airport. I don't know how many choppers we have at the airport now, but it can't be many. This is, of course, assuming we would be willing to use them.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:39 pm to Tllsu
Everyone write down what's happening this week so your kids will have a real account of what a clusterfrick this was. I fear history won't bother.
I'm only partly kidding. This is a historic event worth record keeping on.
I'm only partly kidding. This is a historic event worth record keeping on.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:39 pm to UASports23
The most powerful military in the world and our only option is to negotiate with terrorists... fricking Pathetic.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:40 pm to Pettifogger
The spin will be incredible and big tech will just erase it all if it fits their interests.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:40 pm to BananaManCan
quote:
The most powerful military in the world and our only option is to negotiate with terrorists... fricking Pathetic.
It's not our only option. It's the only option Biden (or whoever the frick is running the country) wants to go with.
Posted on 8/18/21 at 2:40 pm to UASports23
quote:
Austin blaming State Dept for processing.
They put themselves in a position where they had to close the Embassy and relocate it to the airport. Their hurried evac has now left four, FOUR state department employees at the airport Embassy to process all in-person diplomatic needs.
Popular
Back to top


0






