- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Taliban has taken Kabul. Terrorist attack at Airport at least 12 marines confirmed killed
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:04 pm to fr33manator
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:04 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Then what’s the point of having a massive Navy?
It’s just a tricky situation that aircraft and other technology have created in regards to these massive ships. They cost a fortune and take years to build and can now be destroyed by aircraft that costs a small fraction of the costs. Dan Carlin discusses it in one of his podcasts on the war in the Pacific
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:04 pm to Centinel
quote:
They're demonstrating their ignorance of current naval doctrine.
This guy gets it
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:04 pm to fr33manator
If we end up with a single dead American they got left behind This May end up being the biggest blonder in the history of presidential blunders
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:06 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
China literally the new Nazi Germany and everyone turning a blind eye. Already has concentration camps setup throughout the country to curb the Uighurs. Basically has invaded Africa except with money and corruption instead of tanks. And now might actually start invading neighboring territories.
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:09 pm to OldmanBeasley
Carriers just need to get close enough to launch their aircraft. Destroyers, frigates, submarines protect the carrier. Submarines can get in undetected to conduct reconnaissance and launch tomahawks if needed... or torpedoes.
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:09 pm to BananaManCan
quote:
The only thing that would make this situation right would be trading Kamala and Joe to the Taliban for the remaining Americans stranded there.
Sending the people who voted for them to the Taliban would be nice also
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:09 pm to Purple Spoon
Just read the Taliban leader that planned the take over of Kabul was released from GITMO by Obama in 2014 in exchange for Bergdahl.
ETA: LINK
ETA: LINK
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:11 pm to CrawKing
Looks like we have a tanker over Afghanistan tonight.
I wonder if that means we now have fighters on station over Afghanistan in case they need air support for ground forces.
Wouldn’t think they would be aerial refueling transport planes.
I wonder if that means we now have fighters on station over Afghanistan in case they need air support for ground forces.
Wouldn’t think they would be aerial refueling transport planes.
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:11 pm to CrawKing
I don’t think it was the leader, but one of the men with him in the presidential palace. I think the leader was released by the Trump admin, but someone else can correct if that is wrong.
LINK I posted earlier in the thread
LINK I posted earlier in the thread
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:12 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
CNN reporting they have seen Taliban shoot people at a checkpoint near the airport.
But they sounded so peaceful.
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:14 pm to CrawKing
quote:
Just read the Taliban leader that planned the take over of Kabul was released from GITMO by Obama in 2014 in exchange for Bergdahl. This post was edited on 8/17 at 5:10
Holy. shite.
Is this being reported/covered/linked anywhere?
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:15 pm to CrawKing
quote:
the Taliban leader that planned the take over of Kabul was released from GITMO by Obama in 2014 in exchange for Bergdahl.

Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:15 pm to ItTakesAThief
quote:
Looks like we have a tanker over Afghanistan tonight. I wonder if that means we now have fighters on station over Afghanistan in case they need air support for ground forces.
You mean like the ANA anticipated before we surprised them by leaving in the middle of the night?
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:15 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
But they sounded so peaceful.
Reports coming in that their intentions were pure and that the victims were acting in a very aggressive manner with bare ankles showing thus forcing the Taliban into drastic action
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:16 pm to OldmanBeasley
Live look at our government right now:


Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:17 pm to Oilfieldbiology
Well if for some reason the Taliban devcided to take the airport. Or we are seeing the Taliban build up around the airport.
Seems like we better have some air assets on station just in case.
Seems like we better have some air assets on station just in case.
Posted on 8/17/21 at 5:18 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:Whats her name on Fox with all of the defense contacts reported it around the time of that post.
Is this being reported/covered/linked anywhere?
Popular
Back to top



2






