re: Surely there was a Kirk autopsy, correct?

quote:

---

Why would they need one, it was on video and there were a thousand witnesses.

---

All homocides require an autopsy. Standard coroner procedure.

.

quote:

---

You suspect it may have been the vaccine?

---

zinn also confessed. So did several other MK Ultra victims. But Netanyahu didn’t so I guess Mossad is innocent.

Bullet angle, etc. Wound entry, bullet path, etc

All important

quote:

---

zinn also confessed. So did several other MK Ultra victims. But Netanyahu didn’t so I guess Mossad is innocent.

---

You guys do realize this is just a form of grief-denial, right? I loved Charlie but he just was absolutely not important enough for any foreign power to take out that publicly, that brutally, that undeniably.

This is the part of the GOP that lives in fantasy land- where there's one, identifiable enemy. We mock the left for it, but that's basically what you are.

quote:

---

Yeah, of course there will be an autopsy in a capital murder case. But they aren’t going to post it to to tigerdroppings when it’s done. I swear some posters have no clue how the world works.

---

Yes, an autopsy was indicated d/t the nature of the crime. I haven't check UT state laws, but in many states the results of an autopsy is a matter of public records. OTOH, a coroner doesn't normally release preliminary autopsy results. The final autopsy may be delayed months waiting on the toxicology/lab findings.


ETA: UT Office of Medical Examner
"We investigate all sudden, unexpected, violent, suspicious, or unattended deaths in Utah. This includes deaths related to accidents, homicides, suicides, and those without clear medical explanations. We determine the cause of death (the injury, illness, or disease that made the person die) and the manner of death (the general category of death, including natural, accident, homicide, suicide, or undetermined) for each case that we work on.

By law, our case records are considered confidential. We can only give case information to the deceased's next of kin, legal representative, medical provider, or to law enforcement."

TLDR: An autopsy was done as a matter of UT state law, but the results considered confidential."

Of course, if there's a trial, the results of the autopsy will usually then become a matter of public record.

quote:

---

Surely there was a Kirk autopsy, correct?

---

I think he died of a gunshot wound but I’ll wait on the experts.

quote:

---

I'm not sure how you can reasonably squeeze a conspiracy into this one

---

Oh they’ll do it, not reasonably, but they’ll do it.

quote:

---

Even if he was and it deflected, why the frick does anyone need to know that? What difference will it make?

---

No reason and it makes no difference to the final outcome. As I said I don’t believe any autopsy information will be released. Nor should it unless it’s demonstrably pertinent to the official investigation and subsequent trial and then only for judge, jurors, and attorneys.

The OP I responded to expressed concerns regarding no exit wound. Others have as well and made credible observations offering explanations as to why. I shared two.
I know what I think happened.

But in the final analysis, as you imply, none of those issues truly matter. It doesn’t change the fact that Charlie Kirk is the most recent casualty in the cultural war, a real war between good and evil.