- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Surely there was a Kirk autopsy, correct?
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:26 pm to Hateradedrink
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:26 pm to Hateradedrink
There is only one thing I would like confirmation on. The bullet. Does it match the rifle?
I assume it does. If it doesn't we will know there was a second shooter and they have an accomplice in custody.
I would bet a stack of money there was no second shooter out there. Others are not so sure. Sure they could lie. But before I jump on the "real shooter got away" narrative, I would like some smidgen of evidence to suggest that that is the case.
I assume it does. If it doesn't we will know there was a second shooter and they have an accomplice in custody.
I would bet a stack of money there was no second shooter out there. Others are not so sure. Sure they could lie. But before I jump on the "real shooter got away" narrative, I would like some smidgen of evidence to suggest that that is the case.
0
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:26 pm to 308
What do you think would happen to the skull if that was a shot form 138yds or so into the top, middle, or bottom of his neck?
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:26 pm to Frac the world
FYI I’m not one of those people who cares where he was shot. He’s gone.
I’m just relaying what I see a lot of conspiracy people are wanting to know
Continue the downvote spree
I’m just relaying what I see a lot of conspiracy people are wanting to know
Continue the downvote spree
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:28 pm to 308
Utah law requires an autopsy for homicides.
ETA: Ijust did some quick googling and in Utah, autopsies are not public record. They are only released to the next of kin, other medical provider, legal representation and/or law enforcement. I looked because I know in AL that autopsies are public record so I just wanted to check about Utah. So, unless it comes out in court, it may not get released.
ETA: Ijust did some quick googling and in Utah, autopsies are not public record. They are only released to the next of kin, other medical provider, legal representation and/or law enforcement. I looked because I know in AL that autopsies are public record so I just wanted to check about Utah. So, unless it comes out in court, it may not get released.
This post was edited on 9/19/25 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:31 pm to DCtiger1
Because you need to know where the entry and exit wounds are. You need the bullit for ballistics.
I have not heard of an autopsy or have I heard of the found the bullet or if the even looked for it.
You’ve got to match the bullet that killed him to the rifle with the fingerprints of the accused.
Soppose it was not the same caliber as Grandad’s rifle.
I have not heard of an autopsy or have I heard of the found the bullet or if the even looked for it.
You’ve got to match the bullet that killed him to the rifle with the fingerprints of the accused.
Soppose it was not the same caliber as Grandad’s rifle.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:31 pm to 308
I mean, where he was shot was all over video. Not sure why you would need an autopsy.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:34 pm to Swazla
quote:
Because you need to know where the entry and exit wounds are. You need the bullit for ballistics. I have not heard of an autopsy or have I heard of the found the bullet or if the even looked for it. You’ve got to match the bullet that killed him to the rifle with the fingerprints of the accused. Soppose it was not the same caliber as Grandad’s rifle.
No shite Sherlock, that wasn’t my question. Why does any poster on TD or the general public need that information?
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:36 pm to 308
You could not see this in the video? What are you, in 3rd grade? What a stupid fricking comment
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:38 pm to Swazla
This. Not to mention they can get the angle it came in from and where it came from and have the real numbers. Settle the conspiracy folks.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:41 pm to Frac the world
quote:
It doesn’t matter, but I think a lot of people want answers to where exactly he was shot.
It was obvious when his neck exploded from that video that I wish I hadnt seen
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:42 pm to Frac the world
frick off loser
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:46 pm to 308
I’m not sure. And don’t call me Surely.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 4:46 pm to 308
Posted on 9/19/25 at 5:06 pm to 308
quote:
a Kirk autopsy
Posted on 9/19/25 at 5:14 pm to Beessnax
quote:
Plus we had the guy that shot him confess to multiple people that he did, in fact, shoot him. I'm not sure how you can reasonably squeeze a conspiracy into this one
I think one of the conspiracies is that somehow the Jews duped him into doing it.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 5:15 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
You suspect it may have been the vaccine?
Well, he may have died from Covid I guess.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 5:22 pm to Frac the world
quote:
It doesn’t matter, but I think a lot of people want answers to where exactly he was shot.
In the neck
Posted on 9/19/25 at 5:27 pm to back9Tiger
quote:
I mean, where he was shot was all over video. Not sure why you would need an autopsy.
People can't possibly be this dumb.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 5:28 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:I’ve been interested in an autopsy though I assume there’s not going to be a release to the public of it. The issue of no exit wound has raised a few questions among people.
And so there was no exit wound from a 30-06, fired into the soft tissue of a throat???
There are several credible analysts, one in particular, who advance and support a theory that the unusually large neck entrance wound resulted from an upward deflection of the round off the upper lip of an armored breast plate Kirk was wearing. They support the theory with the following.
• No evident exit wound. Such a wound produced by that particular round, at the presumed angle of attack, in the vascular soft tissue of the neck, would almost certainly produce a dramatic exit wound, possibly even wounding one or more people behind him.
• The entrance wound is unusually large upon first visualization, even for that particular round. Their assessment is the upward deflection changed the angle of attack, distorted the round itself, possibly even fragmenting it, and it was traveling upwards and into his cranial cavity. One analyst believes in some videos there is brief but pronounced swelling and distortion of the victim’s head.
•Further supporting a deflected round theory, Kirk’s T-shirt rises up almost to his left ear. Another angle shows a very long narrow billowing of his shirt hitting his neck at the point where the entrance defect first appears.
The shirt falling back into place seems to show a small hole or rip.
•At the time of impact Kirk is knocked backwards, and his shirt at his lower torso balloons out, suggesting to these people that the breastplate was hit at its top causing the bottom to react outwards.
Obviously these folks have access to better videos than I do and more professional expertise in wound ballistics and the like. I found them reasonable in their approach.
I admit when I saw the wound appear I thought he’d been hit with an elephant round it was so huge.
Here’s one guy.
LINK 1
LINK 2
Posted on 9/19/25 at 5:30 pm to Frac the world
quote:
I think a lot of people want answers to where exactly he was shot.
What for? Have you gotten tired of reading through your copy of the Kobe Bryant autopsy?
Who gives a shite. If you have some unquenchable compulsion to know exactly how many inches were blown out of his carotid artery, you have some major issues.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News