Supreme Court Votes to Allow Counting of Ballots in PA with Missing Dates

Shocker

The three wise men? Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch

Everyone else thought this was fine.

quote:

---

missing a handwritten date, as required by state law.

---

Lol. But more laws fixes everything.

Wow. They're complicit in election crimes.

quote:

---

I guess the Republicans better start cheating like the left.

---

It explains a lot that the Right would be "starting" at this point in time.

Missing pertinent info required but hey all good

No explanation?

Republicans won't save us. They are Democrat lite.

Is there a comprehensive list of laws we can all ignore?

START from the premise that each of these ballots was PHYSICALLY-RECEIVED by the election registrar BEFORE the date of the election. As such, there is ZERO chance that the ballots are fraudulently-submitted after the fact to change the election result.

THEN assume that the law required the voter to draw a smiley face on the envelope, alongside the signature. A handful of voters drew a frowny face.

ANSWER the question, how would counting the frowny face ballots foster election fraud?



NOW assume that the law required the voter to use a yellow highlighter to emphasize their signatures, and a few voters instead used a green highlighter.

ANSWER the question, how would counting the green-marked ballots foster election fraud?


As to ballots received on a timely basis, the lack of a date, a smiley face or yellow highlighter would all be IMMATERIAL failures. Insisting upon the date, the smiley face or the yellow highlighting is a matter of "form over substance."

It is really that simple.



If we were discussing ballots received AFTER the deadline, we would be having an entirely different discussion.



BTW, I don't really expect any substantive responses. The responses will consist of insults and sheeplike insistence upon strict compliance with immaterial requirements. No one will be able to provide a logical reason for requiring this dating of timely ballots.