
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I hope you were being meta and mocking the dumbest of MAGA/Q
If Grenell and Musk are with the Q crowd (well, for starters that means I was right about Musk) then I would consider the rest of us in good company, dipshit.
Didn't think that one through very far, did you? More straw grasping from the retard clan.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:30 pm to themunch
He really is and he knows he only firebombs threads in defense of the dem retard gang.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:37 pm to BoarEd
New audio. Does this source trump your source?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:39 pm to ATrillionaire
Anyone who trusts anything coming from one of the Krassenstein brothers is a simple minded fool.
Am I doing it right?
Am I doing it right?
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:39 pm to ATrillionaire
Krassassassastein....really 
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:39 pm to cajunangelle
He’s an advanced model terminator but comes from the baseline “I voted for trump 3 times, but” Arnold t-800. Slow pro is the t-1000 shape shifter
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:39 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Anyone who trusts anything coming from one of the Krassenstein brothers is a simple minded fool.
Am I doing it right?
You finally get it.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:49 pm to DeBoar
FWIW, my quickie search if it's a hipaa violation for hospital to reveal if a patient....
Covers wife searching for drunk husband under exceptions.
Yes, it is generally a HIPAA violation for a healthcare provider or hospital staff member to confirm that a specific individual is a patient, as this constitutes an impermissible disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI).
Covered Entities: HIPAA applies to healthcare providers, hospitals, and insurers. Confirming a patient's presence reveals their treatment relationship, which is protected.
Identifiable Information: Even without disclosing medical details, stating someone is a patient allows the listener to identify the individual’s health status and association with the facility.
Exceptions: Disclosure is permitted if the patient has authorized it, or if the information is shared with family/friends involved in the patient's care for treatment, payment, or healthcare operations.
Non-Covered Individuals: Friends, family, or the general public are not bound by HIPAA and may share such information, but they cannot access it from medical records to do so.
Covers wife searching for drunk husband under exceptions.
Yes, it is generally a HIPAA violation for a healthcare provider or hospital staff member to confirm that a specific individual is a patient, as this constitutes an impermissible disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI).
Covered Entities: HIPAA applies to healthcare providers, hospitals, and insurers. Confirming a patient's presence reveals their treatment relationship, which is protected.
Identifiable Information: Even without disclosing medical details, stating someone is a patient allows the listener to identify the individual’s health status and association with the facility.
Exceptions: Disclosure is permitted if the patient has authorized it, or if the information is shared with family/friends involved in the patient's care for treatment, payment, or healthcare operations.
Non-Covered Individuals: Friends, family, or the general public are not bound by HIPAA and may share such information, but they cannot access it from medical records to do so.
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:50 pm to themunch
quote:
YOu are such an arse these days
Dude this thread seems like LARP central and you used the wrong word (prove not proof)
How am I to know you're not just making fun of them? That's what you would expect from people who engage in silliness like this thread
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:50 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Am I doing it right?
Yes! What took you so long???
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:51 pm to BoarEd
quote:
If Grenell and Musk are with the Q crowd (well, for starters that means I was right about Musk) then I would consider the rest of us in good company, dipshit.
Didn't think that one through very far, did you?
Have you forgotten Elon's comments about Trump and Epstein?
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:52 pm to rocksteady
quote:
I voted for trump 3 times, but”
I haven't voted for Trump 3 times though
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:52 pm to ATrillionaire
The lady said "we would never release any information about our patients"
Then the lady says we are aware of that...
If we play this ludicrous game further I could say, she never denied it. So there. :tongueout:
Talarico is a horrid candidate, he would not rep but only some blue haired burnout tards in Austin.
Paxton is a much better fit, Cornyn and Rove can throw their tantrums. No one GAF about Rove's white board or Bushy ideals.
Capiche?
Then the lady says we are aware of that...
If we play this ludicrous game further I could say, she never denied it. So there. :tongueout:
Talarico is a horrid candidate, he would not rep but only some blue haired burnout tards in Austin.
Paxton is a much better fit, Cornyn and Rove can throw their tantrums. No one GAF about Rove's white board or Bushy ideals.
Capiche?
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 6:53 pm to mwade91383
quote:
You finally get it.
quote:
Yes! What took you so long???
Posted on 10/11/26 at 7:00 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Grenell
That freak defended the Tate's and worked on getting them back from Romania
Posted on 10/11/26 at 7:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/11/26 at 7:24 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 10/11/26 at 7:43 pm to Dawgsontop34
Unfortunately I've been thoroughly convinced that it would be against the law for Lindner Center to acknowledge he was there, so if he was there... they must say this ;)

Popular
Back to top



0








