Started By
Message

re: SO, what exactly is the difference between Neville Chamberlain's leftist pacifist...

Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by MichiganTiger
Where Global Warming is Welcomed!
Member since Dec 2004
7886 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:16 pm to
quote:


Feel free to send your kids to fight and die for Ukraine. Go for it


That's not what I'm advocating for. We need to continue to provide ample assistance to the people fighting for Ukranian independence...the Ukranians themselves.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15433 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

overthrow a democratic country


You mean like what happened in Ukraine in 2014 after their President refused to sign an economic pact with the EU?
Posted by Tiger985
Member since Nov 2006
7465 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:20 pm to
The only American interest in Ukraine is to avoid starting WW3 over it.

I wish Ukraine the best of luck in their war with Russia.

Ukraine is not a part of NATO.

Hell, Ukraine was a part of the Soviet Union for a good chunk of my life and we survived just fine.



Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15433 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Defeated the Taliban in Afghanistan in the early 2000s.


L
O
L
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

quote:

overthrow a democratic country
You mean like what happened in Ukraine in 2014 after their President refused to sign an economic pact with the EU?
Such a tiresome assertion. Repetition does not make it any more accurate.

In 2014 both the people and the legislators of Ukraine wanted the EU deal. Yanukovych refused to sign it, because he was in Russia's back pocket. So the people removed him.

Did we SUPPORT them? Of course.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296383 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

We need to continue to provide ample assistance to the people fighting for Ukranian independence...the Ukranians themselves.


They are fighting a US proxy war. That is 100% evil.

Evil is pushing a war using bodies of others.
Posted by Audustxx
Member since Jul 2022
2251 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:24 pm to
One difference is we don’t have a Kennedy praising tyrants
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15433 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Yanukovych


Refused to sign it because he believed it wasn’t in the best economic interests of his country.

US Presidents take unpopular positions all of the time. Would it be okay for some other country to foment a coup here just because our President did something unpopular?
Posted by Gifman
Member since Jan 2021
17405 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

In 2014 both the people and the legislators of Ukraine wanted the EU deal. Yanukovych refused to sign it, because he was in Russia's back pocket. So the people removed him.


If you think his removal was purely organic, then you're dumber than I originally thought.

Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62567 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

what exactly is the difference
Britain had a national interest. We don't.

If you're looking for an example of current American pacifism... have a look at our border. We've complete surrendered to an unarmed invasion.
This post was edited on 2/22/23 at 12:29 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296383 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

you think his removal was purely organic, then you're dumber than I originally thought.


Hank only believes official positions.
Posted by beachdude
FL
Member since Nov 2008
6303 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

L O L


We successfully sent a small ground force half way around the world backed up by tactical and strategic air assets and rooted out the ruling parties in Afghanistan and their minions in retaliation for that regime providing safe haven for a lethal, crazed, religious terrorist organization. We were not ultimately successful because of feckless, domestic politics.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296383 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

We were not ultimately successful because of feckless, domestic politics.


We haven't won anything in decades.

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80037 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

We need to continue to provide ample assistance to the people fighting for Ukranian independence...the Ukranians themselves.


This is a choice of which Slavic crime family you prefer to help.

There is no virtue or nobility to be found in this fight.
Posted by tivey6301
Member since Jul 2011
2001 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:40 pm to
The same people who said we did not 8 Billion to secure the southern border support sending hundreds of billion's to Ukraine.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8843 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Maybe Victoria Nuland shouldn't have run a coup there in 2014 or Ukraine could have honored Minsk II (that Merkel and Hollande now admit was all bogus) and we wouldn't be in this situation.



You will take your Putin appointed strongman and like it
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296383 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

You will take your Putin appointed strongman and like it


We're not in the same continent. It should have never been our decision.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
5807 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:49 pm to
Neville Chamberlain wasn’t left wing or a pacifist. He was a realist and the reality was Great Britain and Western Europe were broke after WW1. They simply couldn’t afford another World war unlike our current leaders who just print money endlessly
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116716 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Nope...but the American right has,for a very long time, correctly bemoaned Chamberlain's lack of spine for letting Germany plow through Europe before it cast its eyes on the UK. Dude signed a deal with the devil to ensure Britain's safety...which clearly was a weak and pathetic move. At least we supported our European allies before Dec 7 drew us directly into the fray...that's kind of what we're doing now.


No, England knew they were a potential target from the beginning but hoped Hitler would keep his word and stop 'just after this next country.' That hope was ill founded.
America supported Britain before Dec. 7 because we are an English people. We speak English, 100s of cities in the US are named after places in England. Tons of stuff I was taught that Americans invented were actually copied from British inventors.

We are not a Ukrainian people. Ukraine is no more democratic nor less corrupt than Russia. If the Europeans think they're next on Putin's diabolical plan of invasion then they shouldn't depend on him for oil when their stupid solar panels don't work and they should spend more on their military.
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
7610 posts
Posted on 2/22/23 at 12:54 pm to
Perhaps because of the strong possibility of massive, off the scale, corruption.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram