Started By
Message

re: So Pam Bondi released 6+ million docs with over 300 names on the list

Posted on 2/17/26 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8417 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

With a team of thousands of people working full time on it


There are times when I think you might be intelligent and then you post something as stupid as this
This post was edited on 2/17/26 at 3:04 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138784 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

The FBI has been going through the files since last March
That does not help the DOJ. DOJ lawyers are ultimately responsible for redactions and release.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17446 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

And people have decided before they have seen the information whether that information is credible or not in the most predictable manner you can imagine.


Ok. I don't know how you can be made to understand this. After the 100 times it's been repeated. I don't know.. small words? Simple sentences?? In crayon? Children story level? I just don't know. But let's try again.

Alright. Sit and take a deep breath. Clear your mind. You will have to shut off your programming for a second. Don't worry. It will be there when you go back.

Now... you see.... there was this person called a president. He was in office last term. He, and especially his wife, really wanted to stay in this big house they thought they should stay in because it made them happy. And they were trying their very very best. Now. They had these same files in the DOJ. There was no markings at all on them and they could see everything. What they could have done was point to some things that would have really really made this big bad orange monster look very bad. That's all they would have to do to stay. But they couldn't do that for some reason, even though that president had been ok with some made up stuff when he was Vice president.

But some people, for reasons unknown, believe that they decided to not release any bad information on the big bad orange monster that was going to take their rightful home from them. The place they felt they really belonged.

Instead, the big bad orange monster destroyed the frail president in a battle of words... some people call a debate. Some people believe they didn't release information on the big bad orange monster but decided to foolishly try to out battle the big bad orange monster. And these people, to this very day, sit and hope that the friends of the frail old president will find this information and bring down the big bad orange monster. One day they say. Onnne day.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173587 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

That does not help the DOJ. DOJ lawyers are ultimately responsible for redactions and release.

Fair enough

But it's worth pointing out that some of the redactions were made at the FBI level before the DOJ even had access to the documents

There is a multi level redaction process going on and even the DOJ is somewhat in the dark. I'm sure the excuse will be "national security issues" but we'll never know the real reasons.
Posted by FLTech
he/won
Member since Sep 2017
28161 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 3:25 pm to
I'm just shocked that we are days into the full release of the Epstein files and the world is still spinning
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
22181 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 4:30 pm to
Wikipedia page is going crazy with updates of names on the lists. Here are some interesting (and not so interesting) ones:

Woody Allen
Doug Band (former Clinton Aide)
Steve Bannon
Tom Barrack (Trump Fundraiser)
David Blaine (the freaking magician)
Richard Branson
William Burns (Former CIA Director)
Fidel Castro
Deepak Cohopra
Bill Clinton
David Copperfield (what is it with Epstein and magicians???)
Bill Cosby
Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso)
Alan Dershowitz
Bill Gates
Joe Gibbs
Stephen Hawking
Michael Jackson
Thorbjørn Jagland (former Norwegian Prime Minister)
Jay-Z
Brett Kavanaugh )(yep...that one - US Supreme Court Justice)
Robert Kennedy Jr (US Health Secretary)
Miroslav Lajcák (former President of the UN General Assembly)
Guy Laliberte' (founder of Cirque du Soleil)
Howard Lutnick (Secretary of Commerce)
Mohammed bin Salman (Crown Prince/Prime Minister Saudi Arabia)
Elon Musk
Kimbal Musk (Elon's less talented brother)
John Phelan (US Secretary of the Navy)
Vladimir Putin
Kevin Rudd (former Prime Minister of Australia)
Kathryn Ruemmler (White House Counsel under Obama)
Kevin Spacey
Peter Thiel (founder of PayPal)
Steve Tisch (NY Giants Owner)
Donald Trump
Donald Trump Jr
Eric Trump
Melania Trump
Brian Vickers (NASCAR Driver)
Michael Waltrip (NASCAR Driver/Owner)
Harvey Weinstein
Mark Zuckerberg
Jacob Zuma (former President of South Africa)


That's some highlights listed alphabetically. There are a ton more...so, the trend...politicians, NASCAR Drivers and Magicians are at the forefront.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38330 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 4:56 pm to
quote:


6 million files takes a long time to go through

Why would you ask such a silly question?
If you were handed six million files, the way to handle it isn’t “everyone grab a stack and start reading.” That’s how you drown. You treat it like a data operation first, journalism second.

Step one is ingestion. Everything gets dumped into a searchable database. OCR the scans, strip out duplicates, tag document types, extract names, dates, locations, orgs. That part is mostly machines. In a week or two you’ve turned six million random files into structured data.

Step two is indexing. Build a master list of every unique name and rank them by frequency and by context. Someone mentioned once in a contact list is different from someone appearing in financial transfers, travel logs, and internal emails.

Step three is clustering. Filter by categories that actually matter: money movement, travel records, legal settlements, communications tied to key actors. Now you’re not staring at six million files, you’re staring at prioritized buckets.

Realistically, after de-duplication and filtering, maybe half the files even require human review. Let’s say 500,000 documents need eyeballs. Over 90 days that’s about 5,500 per day. If one trained reviewer can process 200–300 short docs per day, you’d need roughly 25–30 reviewers working in parallel. Add 10 senior reporters, a handful of legal staff, and some researchers for cross-referencing and you’re looking at maybe 50–60 total people to aggressively triage it in three months. Double that if the docs are messy and you still aren’t in crazy territory.

Six million files isn’t a mystical barrier. It’s a math problem. With a 60–100 person team and modern document processing tools, three months is entirely feasible for meaningful analysis.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89726 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

6 million files takes a long time to go through Why would you ask such a silly question?


When are idiots like you going to read them?


You wanted the files released. Who should we expect to be arrested?



Oh yeah that’s right, you and the rest of the anti Trump brigade never cared about this. You are a piece of shite.
Posted by jlnoles79
Member since Jan 2014
14471 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

I'm just shocked that we are days into the full release of the Epstein files and the world is still spinning


Not true
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29730 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

You wanted the files released. Who should we expect to be arrested?


No one will be arrested because Bill Barr gave blanket immunity to everyone involved.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173587 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 5:38 pm to
quote:


No one will be arrested because Bill Barr gave blanket immunity to everyone involved.

Part of the first Trump Epstein adjacent administration.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90529 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:25 pm to
Powertard putting in that indy work.
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
25212 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:29 pm to
All smoke and mirrors.....a big nothing burger. Not one on that list will suffer, IMO.
Posted by FLTech
he/won
Member since Sep 2017
28161 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 7:23 pm to
Posted by Root_User
Member since Dec 2025
220 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

I'm ignorant of such, but couldn't we send them through AI and identify the important folks still living.


People have built LLM’s just using the files as the data source. Basically a ChatGPT that only contains information from th3 “files.”
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29730 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

quote:

No one will be arrested because Bill Barr gave blanket immunity to everyone involved.

Part of the first Trump Epstein adjacent administration.


2008 predated Donald Trump's administration.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173587 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 3:48 pm to
Yes. But he didn't have to appoint Barr as his AG
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8602 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

6 million files takes a long time to go through


That's what the DOJ tried to tell Massie, Khanna and the rest of the cackling hyena's but they just couldn't wait.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29730 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Yes. But he didn't have to appoint Barr as his AG


Trump didn't know Barr at all. It was Pat Cipollone and Laura Ingraham who pushed Trump to hire Bill Barr. Cipollone (White House Counsel) and Laura Ingraham worked under Barr in 1992-1993 as assistants to AG Bill Barr. This was the same Cipollone who turned on Trump prior to Jan 6th and who later joined Bill Barr at Barr's law firm, the Torridon Group.

Who told Trump to hire Cipollone as White House Counsel? Well the same Laura Ingraham whose emails characterized Trump's contesting the stolen 2020 election as "the Loser's strategy"and the man who Trump calls "a sleaze bag", Federalist Society's Leonard Leo. and a "bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America," Trump also accused Leo of controlling judges, giving "bad advice" on nominations, and "a bad guy" tied to foreign interests.

All four (Cipollone, Leo, Barr, and Ingraham) attend the same Opus Dei affiliated Catholic Church in DC called the Catholic Information Center.

Want to know who else is a member of the CIC? Larry Kudlow & Sam Brownbach are members who weren't invited back because Trump no longer trusts anyone associated with Opus Dei and the CIC. The only CIC member who is known to be serving in this administration is JD Vance who Trump has for all collective purposes sidelined in the last few months.
This post was edited on 2/18/26 at 7:32 pm
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10068 posts
Posted on 2/19/26 at 7:26 am to


[quote]Yall stop tawkin bout it nuppin gone happen!!![\quote]




BBC News reported that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, was arrested early Thursday morning on suspicion of misconduct in public office, amid allegations he shared confidential government trade documents with the late Jeffrey Epstein. The Epstein fallout continues to spread by the day, rattling not just governments but also the corporate world.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram