- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So it was one juror that saved Manafort
Posted on 8/23/18 at 8:08 am to DarthRebel
Posted on 8/23/18 at 8:08 am to DarthRebel
Had this been a trial in state court in the state of Louisiana, this one juror everyone is praising would have been nothing more than a footnote in the court minutes, as 11-1 is a proper jury verdict, as is 10-2. In fact, the rest of the jury wouldn’t have even had an obligation to listen to anything that person had to say.
This post was edited on 8/23/18 at 8:12 am
0
Posted on 8/23/18 at 8:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
In the OJ case, the jurors in the criminal case came to the unanimous decision that the State failed to meet the (high) burden for a criminal conviction.
LOL.... the jurors in the criminal case let OJ walk because he was black. Don't kid yourself.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 8:15 am to AggieHank86
quote:Right. A team inclusive of lawyers who succeeded in convincing courts to sentence individuals on nonexistent law. A team inclusive of lawyers who bankrupted national businesses and succeeded in getting jail time for targets, regardless of innocence. That requires great skill.
Seems like only last week that the forum consensus said that the OSC had the incompetent legal staff.
Crooked? Yes. Corrupt? Probably. Partisan? Definitely.
Incompetent? Nope.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 8:31 am to shrevetigertom
quote:Your drivel proves my point about yahoos on the internet.
The point is that just because they saw all of the evidence doesn’t mean they will get it right, genius.
There was lots of evidence against OJ ... as confirmed by the civil verdict and judgment against him. That is not the same as “beyond reasonable doubt.”. Intelligent people who heard the evidence in both trials (criminal and civil) mostly agree that BOTH juries got it right, genius.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 9:23 am to shrevetigertom
quote:
Just like OJ, right?
Posted on 8/23/18 at 9:33 am to SSpaniel
quote:I hope she went into a protection program.
Manafort Juror Speaks Out - Sara A. Carter
LINK
*Juror believes Mueller's prosecution team wanted to undermine Trump
*Said just one member stood in the way of convicting Manafort on all 18 counts
This post was edited on 8/23/18 at 9:51 am
Posted on 8/23/18 at 9:44 am to DarthRebel
quote:
This is not the lone holdout, that juror is currently unknown.
We don’t have the name of the juror yet but someone leaked his picture.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 9:46 am to Decatur
quote:Hunt him down and destroy him!
We don’t have the name of the juror yet but someone leaked his picture.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 9:49 am to Decatur
Damn strong forensic accounting testimony required to bring ol' Vlad along for 8 counts.
This post was edited on 8/23/18 at 10:04 am
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News