- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So according to my leftist acquaintance, the burning of all of the Teslas
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:53 am to tide06
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:53 am to tide06
quote:
The only chance we have to fix it without actual violence is if USAID/DOGE stops the flow of incendiary media to the DNC base and the “expert” class stops telling them the world is going to end if we don’t get the right out of the way so we can fix climate change / racism / patriarchy/ etc.
IF one could reason with these paid lunatics, I would agree with you. Therefore, my solution is to use savings from DOGE to proceed with building the camps.
IF these people actually cared about the United States of America, they would not be progressive democrats in today's world.
0
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:54 am to RoosterCogburn585
I had one say it’s not domestic terrorism, but rather a “correction”.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:55 am to RoosterCogburn585
sure ….
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:55 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Has anyone in the entire country asserted that burning someone else’s vehicle is protected by the First Amendment?
Yes. You underestimate just how dumb libs are.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:56 am to RoosterCogburn585
It is, by definition, vandalism, right?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:56 am to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
Are you arguing the Tesla vandalism, not the car keying but the firebombing of cars/dealerships is not a form of terrorism?
What's the difference between that and abortion clinic bombings? Both are using violence to affect political decisions.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 7:58 am to AggieHank86
You seem to think you come off as witty and clever. I bet you think you are smarter than all of us huh?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:00 am to VOR
quote:It is, but saying that is not an adequate level of virtue signaling. You MUST call it "terrorism."
It is, by definition, vandalism, right?
They overlook the "intent" element of a terrorism charge. Good luck meeting that burden BRD.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:01 am to AggieHank86
quote:
They overlook the "intent" element of a terrorism charge.
Intent to do what is the burden?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:03 am to AggieHank86
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 8:05 am
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:03 am to AggieHank86
So, in your view, what is the "intent" if it's not intimidation to influence. Because, to me it seems very similar to activities done by the mob to influence people to make the "right decision".
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:04 am to RoosterCogburn585
Unplanned act of free speech
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:08 am to BugAC
quote:I tend to reserve that word for things like Tokyo and Dresden.
firebombing
Let's be clear. Setting fires (arson) at those dealerships is illegal ... felonious ... and should absolutely be prosecuted The question is whether it rises tot the level of "terrorism."
I tend to think that calling it "terrorism" is a lot like calling J-6 an "insurrection." It just does not rise to that level, IMO. Both were LARPing gone too far ... and criminal. Both should be prosecuted on that basis.
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 8:32 am
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:18 am to RoosterCogburn585
Get a new acquaintance
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Has anyone in the entire country asserted that burning someone else’s vehicle is protected by the First Amendment?
Well, there is this:
LINK
quote:
Cuomo told his viewers. "And please, show me where it says protesters are supposed to be polite and peaceful.
"Yeah it's not like the First Amendment specifies our rights as 'peaceably to assemble,'" The Federalist publisher Ben Domenech quipped.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:40 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
the burning of all of the Teslas
Ironic using fossil fuel to burn an electric car. Without the fossil fuel what would they have done? Matches and news paper?
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 10:19 am
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:42 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
Is just an example of "serious vandalism". That's a direct quote.
I wouldnt even have an acquaintance that is this type of person.
I have friends that support the wrong side but they dont support people vandalizing other peoples property.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:50 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
Definition of terrorism from FEMA "the use of force or violence against persons or property in violation of the criminal laws of the United States for purposes of intimidation, coercion, or ransom". Pretty sure that fits it too a tee.
Rooster Cogburn 1
Aggie Hank 0
Advantage Cogburn
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:52 am to RoosterCogburn585
Check this one out ... looks like it came straight out of an episode of South Park.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 8:54 am to AggieHank86
quote:They certainly 'asserted' that burning, destroying and looting our cities [including the building I work in] was just protected speech.
Has anyone in the entire country asserted that burning someone else’s vehicle is protected by the First Amendment?
So funny how far you go.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News