Started By
Message

re: So according to Leftists and Liberaltarians , it's not OK to call someone groomer...

Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87381 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

LINK

In their own words:
quote:
DQSH captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models. In spaces like this, kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and imagine a world where everyone can be their authentic selves!



bringing receipts
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139031 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Is it your position that oral sex is not sex? OK, Billy Jeff.

The term you used was "frick", Billy Jeff
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:29 pm to
Why the hell would I care if you call someone groomer? I am not a fan of any sexual shite being advocated towards kids. To me, kids cannot consent, so a lot of my libertarian values don't necessarily translate.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

I figured you couldn't produce such posts, because you're just an insincere weasel.


If you are going to categorize me as "progressive" because I don't fall in line with your zealots, you aren't worth a serious response.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44313 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Ok, we’ll the thread is why the left and libertarians care. Because calling a group of people you don’t like pedophiles is wrong.



Your lie is duly noted:

quote:

So according to Leftists and Liberaltarians , it's not OK to call someone groomer... Posted by oogabooga68 on 7/22/22 at 8:42 am Even if they are advocating for or engaged in the grooming of children?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128844 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Because calling a group of people you don’t like pedophiles is wrong.


I agree.

Also, calling people “evil” who are recruiting kids to a point of view that is enormously damaging psychologically and potentially physically is absolutely correct. And we should be doing more of it.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115469 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:30 pm to
But perfectly fine to call them:

Racist
White supremacist
Misogynist
Homophobe
Transphobic
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87381 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Ok, we’ll the thread is why the left and libertarians care. Because calling a group of people you don’t like pedophiles is wrong.



It's a little weird to me you won't even stay on the topic of the actual term at issue.

Why is it "wrong" (semantically? Morally? etc.) to call people who want to indoctrinate small children about sex and gender "groomers"?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28172 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Because calling a group of people you don’t like pedophiles is wrong.


Yea! Not all of them are pedophiles, some are just too dumb to realize they're helping create environments where sexual predators can flourish. BIG DIFFERENCE!
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128844 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

It's a little weird to me you won't even stay on the topic of the actual term at issue.


You just meet Sammy for the first time?
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55454 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Because calling a group of people you don’t like pedophiles is wrong.


LOL.

I love this so much. Another stupid wanna be kiddie fricker that is projecting unto everyone else that, if they oppose, it is actually gay people they "hate", not those who want to frick our kids.

What a sick, twisted way to defend your fetish. What a sick bastard you are.

Let me guess, when you hear about Monkey Pox, you think of blacks too?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28172 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

your zealots


wrong
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44313 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

For you to have a point, that's exactly what it is.


Reality is the point.

You fail as well.

This post was edited on 7/22/22 at 12:35 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Reality is the point.


Sure. Your version of it at least.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55757 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Even if they are advocating for or engaged in the grooming of children? Talk about taking flak for being over the target....


Beyond infesting every major institution in America the other effective strategy of the cultural Marxists is controlling and redefining the written and spoken language.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44313 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Sure. Your version of it at least.


It was what I would do in a scenario, so...

Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:41 pm to
Then what are you arguing about? Just counting the minutes until the weekend?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79445 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Why is it "wrong" (semantically? Morally? etc.) to call people who want to indoctrinate small children about sex and gender "groomers"?


Well semantically it’s because “indoctrinating” kids about gender and sex isn’t the same as setting them up to be sexually assaulted. Which is what grooming is.

Morally, I think It’s wrong to intentionally associate people with pedophilia because you don’t like them. I think The same posters who hold trans and gays to this standard turn a blind eye to other large well documented groups with known pedophilia issues. If this was about the kids we’d be fleeing the churches in mass and calling all priest pastor or teachers groomers.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
73096 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

No.


quote:


He and this girl had previously met in the school bathroom for voluntary sex and had met there THIS time for the same.
She changed her mind, which she of course had every right to do.


So he sexually assaulted her?

quote:


He is also accused of feeling up a different girl in an empty classroom at a different school.


So he sexually assaulted her?


You and him have the same general misunderstanding of the word "No" apparently.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
73096 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:



Hank is having two scoops of fail for lunch.



Definitely a steady diet.
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18 19 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram