
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should Trump have let Iran have it’s nuke?
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:19 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:19 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
quote:
Should Trump have let Iran have it’s nuke?
In the infamous words of midwestern philosopher Lester Miles…

Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:23 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
quote:
Maybe it would’ve been better to let Iran go ahead and nuke someone, like NY or LA. These stupid people voting blue are incapable of thinking critically or deducing outcomes… maybe they should have been able to see first-hand? Might would’ve been less damage done overall if that was the case?
Except more people with a college education vote blue over red...
fricking pussy arse snowflake
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:35 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Don't worry, the Dems will be flooding our money back to them and they'll be nuking the jews and murica in due time. Congrats idiots for falling for the Dem gaslighting.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:39 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
quote:
If your house burns in a fire and you had hundreds of billions of dollars at your disposal, you couldn’t build back? Think about it… take all the time ya need…
You aren’t building that type of house back in a year. Answer the question retard.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:39 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Trump fell for Israel's bullshite hook line and sinker and is paying the price.
Historically speaking it probably would have been better if Bush left Sadaam Hussein and the fake WMD's alone (that Isreal convinced him of) so a strong Iraq could have dealt with Iran.
Historically speaking it probably would have been better if Bush left Sadaam Hussein and the fake WMD's alone (that Isreal convinced him of) so a strong Iraq could have dealt with Iran.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:41 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Ironic the OP is critical of the decision making skills and intelligence of voters while being incapable of knowing the difference between its and it’s.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:42 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
quote:
Should Trump have let Iran have it’s nuke?
Worst cope ever. They didn't have one. Didn't want one. Bibi has been lying about this for over 30 years. After this war, however, you can guarantee that Iran will get a nuke.
2 dumbest foreign policy moves in US history:
- Pushing Russia away when they desperately wanted to move closer to the West after the wall came down.
- Going to war for Israel.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 12:53 am to Stat M Repairman
I have to agree, he listened to Rubio and linsey, warhawaks to their core and played Trump, maybe he realize's this now and will backdown from Iran but his pride might not let him. He also needs to dump Ukraine another foolish globalist war that needs to end.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 1:06 am to bamalee
Teed up hanging curveball for him and they knew he would swing.
The midnight hammer bullshite was a test. As soon as he bit on it they knew they had him.
A number on here called it out at the time.
The midnight hammer bullshite was a test. As soon as he bit on it they knew they had him.
A number on here called it out at the time.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 1:24 am to PoppaD
Israel's bullshite?
The same two week bullshite the IAEA said?
Fake WMD's?
You sure about that?
No sarin and mustard gas used on the Kurds?
But, yes, a strong Iraq possibly could have kept Iran in check. That's an interesting take.
The same two week bullshite the IAEA said?
Fake WMD's?
You sure about that?
No sarin and mustard gas used on the Kurds?
But, yes, a strong Iraq possibly could have kept Iran in check. That's an interesting take.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 1:30 am to Stat M Repairman
Well, the Yellowcake was bs, but the IAEA report and the Halabja massacre were real, so i.dont know what else to tell.you
Posted on 11/4/26 at 1:46 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Do you realize that the Israelis have been saying that same shite for 40 years????
Google it.
They have been a few months away for 40 years. It was always bullshite because the Attollah has a fatwa saying they were never to built a nuclear weapon. But we killed him. Netanyahu told Obama, Bush I and 2 and Clinton that if we didn’t do something they would nuke them. Everybody else told them go ahead and do it, we will not touch that and you bear all the consequences.
Google it.
They have been a few months away for 40 years. It was always bullshite because the Attollah has a fatwa saying they were never to built a nuclear weapon. But we killed him. Netanyahu told Obama, Bush I and 2 and Clinton that if we didn’t do something they would nuke them. Everybody else told them go ahead and do it, we will not touch that and you bear all the consequences.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 3:07 am to GoblinGuide
quote:
Did he not claim to have wiped out their nuclear abilities just last year?
Hence thee question that was posed
Posted on 11/4/26 at 3:16 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
They should have cut off power and comms to the government and provided starlink access and pumped in propaganda to help resistance organize.
The miscalculation is that a bombing campaign would cause the fall of the IRGC.
It didn’t. And now we will have to deal with an emboldened IRGC. They feared an Iraq style invasion. They know now we can’t even sustain a bombing campaign without voter retribution.
They’ve survived the only thing we’re willing to throw at them. That makes for a dangerous enemy.
The miscalculation is that a bombing campaign would cause the fall of the IRGC.
It didn’t. And now we will have to deal with an emboldened IRGC. They feared an Iraq style invasion. They know now we can’t even sustain a bombing campaign without voter retribution.
They’ve survived the only thing we’re willing to throw at them. That makes for a dangerous enemy.
This post was edited on 11/4/26 at 3:20 am
Posted on 11/4/26 at 4:14 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Iran has been six months away from a nuclear weapon for the last 25 years.
It’s the neocon version of climate change will end the world in 6 years
It’s the neocon version of climate change will end the world in 6 years
Posted on 11/4/26 at 4:18 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
quote:
Maybe it would’ve been better to let Iran go ahead and nuke someone, like NY or LA.
You people crack me up.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 5:02 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Yes, we should have let them have it and use it on Israel.
Let them fight and kill each other. Don’t care at this point.
Let them fight and kill each other. Don’t care at this point.
Posted on 11/4/26 at 5:50 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Are we still waiting on weapons of mass destruction of Iraq? In all seriousness, the Iran war and high gas prices did them in.

Popular
Back to top



0









