- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Senior DoJ Investigator Confirms Bill Clinton Raped Children on Epstein's Plane
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:27 am to AlterEd
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:27 am to AlterEd
quote:
Most people with any common sense realize this, but I still see folks running around saying there is no evidence of any of this shite.
I doubt very seriously that's what anybody has said.
I would bet a lot of money that what has been said is that there is no evidence in what has been released so far.
0
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:32 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
This is a never-gonna-win battle. 17 isn’t 7-8-9, etc.. but even attempting to make any distinction will get you deported to the pedo file zone. Even if you clarify both are super wrong, evil, illegal & clearly declare you’re not advocating that one is somehow “ok” because they appear old enough. “15 will get you 20” is understood for what it is, but trying to say more… yeah, just don’t.
These little concessions are how we lose civilization. What’s true is true. Say it.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:32 am to gumbeaux
quote:Hell yeah there is! Epstein and some of his cronies had "TDS" before there ever was an actual disease called "TDS." Epstein trashed, and shite talked Trump for years in emails. So much so that Trumps name appears in the trove of Epstein files 38,000 times.
There is a lot of smoke around Trump since he is frequently mentioned in the files and is known to hang out with Epstein. He may not be guilty of anything but there will be a lot of pressure to investigate him if others that are included in the files are investigated and indicted.
Epstein fed a US representative (Stacey Plaskett) play-by-play instructions via text during congressional hearings on how the line of questioning she should use with Michael Cohen to damage Trump. Epstein fed her real-time questions during the hearing.
Epstein wanted Trump to go down, hard, WHY?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:35 am to RT1941
quote:
Epstein wanted Trump to go down, hard, WHY?
Because he believed Trump was responsible for him going to jail the first time. This according to Michael Wolff who collaborated with Epstein to take Trump down.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:37 am to AlterEd
There is not a democrat in the country that wouldn’t congratulate bill concerning this
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:37 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Underage and children is not the same thing
This^^^ is exactly what many on the left speak about when they discuss dropping the age of consent for sex from 16 down to 13-14 years of age. The biggest push to drop the age of consent is from gay men who like young boys.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:43 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
This^^^ is exactly what many on the left speak about when they discuss dropping the age of consent for sex from 16 down to 13-14 years of age. The biggest push to drop the age of consent is from gay men who like young boys.
Exactly. I'm highly suspicious of people who say this sort of shite.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:45 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
This^^^ is exactly what many on the left speak about when they discuss dropping the age of consent for sex from 16 down to 13-14 years of age. The biggest push to drop the age of consent is from gay men who like young boys.
Well, we can't even establish the fact that pedophilia means being attracted to prepubescent people.
People like Ed are so in the weeds on this shite he's admitting he is a pedophile every time he posts.
You guys are saying having sex with a college aged chick is pedophilia. So have it pedophiles.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 10:47 am
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:46 am to AlterEd
Sorry, but I'm not buying it.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:46 am to PeleofAnalytics
quote:BWAHAHAHA. You bring up the TWO cases. Erie and ACORN. Are you one of the liberals who admitted you've been diagnosed with mental illness? Is that why you don't know the settlements were about HOW the video was obtained, not that a court ruled the events in the videos were "fake." Halfwit
I guess he settled and made this statement because he posted 100% truth?
quote:How about you get a clue. I've been hit with this moronic claim before, champ. You aren't the first buffoon to try it.
Just bow out dude
quote:Oh yeah? List them, genius
He has been sued and had to settle lawsuits for bullshite he has posted or published
quote:LOL. Frickin loser. BYE
I am not sticking around for your gaslighting
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:48 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
That's some hard crawfishing. I quoted you, genius. How about you buy a brain and look up the genetic fallacy.
You quoted me but intentionally left out a quote that contradicts your claim I "can't accept the truth". I expressly said I could accept the truth genius.
But yeah... saying a video seems a little suspect does not mean you
quote:the underlying accusation. If a 3rd grader wrote in crayon a paper (with some illustrations) on the Kennedy assassination being an inside job, I would rightfully say the paper was a little suspect. That doesn't mean I "cannot accept" the the possibility of it being an inside job.
cannot accept
You can't seem to grasp that the amateurish presentation of information causes the underlying claim to be subject to higher levels of scrutiny and suspicion. One would think that was common sense but I seem to have assumed to much of some of you. Simply commenting on how suspect the presentation is does not mean I cannot accept the accusation. I really am not going to waste any more time on you people. You are just as retarder as AlterEd so you cannot be helped. Later
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:48 am to dgnx6
quote:
People like Ed are so in the weeds on this shite he's admitting he is a pedophile every time he posts.
This coming from the guy who is essentially saying that politicians raping 14 year old girls is ok because in Brazil the age of consent is 14. Go frick yourself, you frickin creep.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 10:50 am
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:53 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Depends on what the definition of ‘rape’ is.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:55 am to AlterEd
quote:
THERE IS FOOTAGE of Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein having sex with underage victims on his plane
There is footage of Bigfoot too.
A lot of people on here want this to be true and just avoid critical thinking.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:55 am to dgnx6
quote:
Well, we can't even establish the fact that pedophilia means being attracted to prepubescent people.
The US government considers one to be an adult when they turn 18. The medical profession considers one to be an adult once they turn 18.
Know what they are when they are 17 and below?? Children. Minors.
If a 44 year old has sex with a 17 year old, what do you call it? What about 16? 15? 14?
Where do you draw the line on someone that is too young for you to have sex with?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:57 am to Placekicker
Again, they keep using the 17 number because it's as close as possible to legal age even though the victims were as young as 14. Their bias and their agenda is clear here and they are disgusting fricking people.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:57 am to Pettifogger
quote:What is grooming a 17 year old?
Anyone grooming a 16 or 17 year old should be too.
Legal consent is younger than 17 in many normal countries.
I understand the idea of grooming is terrible and gross. But the right is way too protective over EVERY 17 year old bitch out here. Idk if it’s bc y’all have kids and you see your little girl in every other girl no matter what age.
Were these girls even there against their will?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:59 am to AlterEd
quote:
they're not going to show you evidence of children being abused.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 11:00 am to PeleofAnalytics
quote:LOL. That has got to be the most crawfishing post ever. Look, you complained about the production quality and suggested it undermined the truth of the video. Textbook genetic fallacy. Own it.
You quoted me but intentionally left out...
In fact, you're STILL doing it. Maybe you're incapable of learning
quote:BWAHAHA. No it does not. Not at all. Not one bit. Go look up the genetic fallacy.
amateurish presentation of information causes the underlying claim to be subject to higher levels of scrutiny and suspicion
quote:Good. Maybe go get educated when you leave
I really am not going to waste any more time on you people
quote:How about you learn to spell
You are just as retarder as AlterEd so you cannot be helped
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News