- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Senior DoJ Investigator Confirms Bill Clinton Raped Children on Epstein's Plane
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:09 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:09 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:Did you even watch the video?
So Bill is fricking a little girl on a video in court and the jury said eh, no big deal?
This thread is bringing out the special people
2
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:14 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
This thread is bringing out the special people
I can't imagine trying to make excuses for these frickin creeps.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:19 pm to AlterEd
Paulina Luna names names of Epstein's co-conspirators, four adult women, who trafficked children as young as 10 years old.
10 years old. They're not all 17 years and 11 months, you fricking creeps.
10 years old. They're not all 17 years and 11 months, you fricking creeps.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:25 pm to AlterEd
There's a lot of crazy stuff said on this board but denigrating O'Keefe has got to be the most quintessential contemporary example of cognitive dissonance.
The guy records people admitting to crimes or SMEs describing crimes and libs have an absolute meltdown over O'Keefe, not the criminals. It's the damndest thing ever. It's like people have a mind virus that gaslights themselves. Don't believe your eyes!!! O'Keefe is lying somehow, even though he's not in the video!!
And it's not like Nick Shirley releasing 1 video so he has no track record of uncovering crimes for the last 10+ years yet never had to issue a retraction of content
The guy records people admitting to crimes or SMEs describing crimes and libs have an absolute meltdown over O'Keefe, not the criminals. It's the damndest thing ever. It's like people have a mind virus that gaslights themselves. Don't believe your eyes!!! O'Keefe is lying somehow, even though he's not in the video!!
And it's not like Nick Shirley releasing 1 video so he has no track record of uncovering crimes for the last 10+ years yet never had to issue a retraction of content
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:28 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
The OP has a video of a prosecutor describing the evidence that has been presented in court.
Should be an open and shut case. What day does sentencing begin?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:30 pm to somethingdifferent
OKeefe and Shirley spying on corrupt criminals: BAD
Deep state spying on Trump, republican lawmakers, and media: GOOD
Deep state spying on Trump, republican lawmakers, and media: GOOD
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:37 pm to Vacherie Saint
All these people claiming there's no evidence children were involved or even making excuses for people fricking 14 year old girls because of Brazilian laws have fricking vanished suddenly. It's the damndest thing.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:40 pm to AlterEd
You do realize that Trump's DoJ has said this guy was talking out his arse. He never worked anywhere near the Epstein case. Even Prager said he was shite talking.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:40 pm to AlterEd
So the Pedocrats had Trump in a trap.
He can't release everything because the DOJ WON"T release everything.
Epstein was using the girls under the orders/direction of the DOJ.
It was the DOJ doing it.
They won't tell on themselves.
So the Pedocrats could scream for transparency and accuse Trump of involvement and or cover up.......knowing/thinking it wouldn't get released.
Longstanding international relationships could be permanently and irreversibly damaged by this, it's about a lot more than any one person.
He can't release everything because the DOJ WON"T release everything.
Epstein was using the girls under the orders/direction of the DOJ.
It was the DOJ doing it.
They won't tell on themselves.
So the Pedocrats could scream for transparency and accuse Trump of involvement and or cover up.......knowing/thinking it wouldn't get released.
Longstanding international relationships could be permanently and irreversibly damaged by this, it's about a lot more than any one person.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:41 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
What is grooming a 17 year old?
Legal consent is younger than 17 in many normal countries.
I understand the idea of grooming is terrible and gross. But the right is way too protective over EVERY 17 year old bitch out here.
Here's one of them. You disgusting piece of shite. Can you make excuses for 10 year olds being involved too?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:43 pm to dgnx6
quote:
You haven't shown any evidence of pedophilia or forceable rape of children.
And here's another.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:44 pm to GumboPot
And there aren't many victims because they probably fed them to the sharks in the Atlantic off LSJ.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:46 pm to dgnx6
What will this piece of shits excuse be for the victims being as young as 10?
You're fricking disgusting.
You're fricking disgusting.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:46 pm to AlterEd
It depends on what the definition of "is" is......
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:50 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Also names 4 women Luna says engaged in trafficking w/Epstein.
'Member when I was the a'hole that said the victims didn't deserve anything because they profited from their "abuse" instead of seeking true justice? Good times and thanks Rep Luna for confirming this
Oh.....and did she just do what Masshole and his boyfriend Khanna were "threatening" to do?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:52 pm to ReauxlTide222
Sure it is
Posted on 2/27/26 at 1:23 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:OMG did you not watch the video?!? He explains what happened
Should be an open and shut case. What day does sentencing begin?
What is wrong with people
Posted on 2/27/26 at 1:26 pm to AlterEd
Pump the brakes there a bit:
Justice Department disputes Glenn Prager's Epstein investigation role.
The Department of Justice issued a statement distancing the agency from Prager's claims and questioning his access to relevant information.
A DOJ spokesperson clarified that Prager worked as a program analyst more than 15 years ago and had no direct involvement in or access to underlying facts related to the Epstein investigation.
The DOJ has not provided official confirmation supporting any of Prager's allegations about Epstein's intelligence connections or claims about political figures.
Justice Department disputes Glenn Prager's Epstein investigation role.
The Department of Justice issued a statement distancing the agency from Prager's claims and questioning his access to relevant information.
A DOJ spokesperson clarified that Prager worked as a program analyst more than 15 years ago and had no direct involvement in or access to underlying facts related to the Epstein investigation.
The DOJ has not provided official confirmation supporting any of Prager's allegations about Epstein's intelligence connections or claims about political figures.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 1:26 pm to KiwiHead
quote:When did this happen?
You do realize that Trump's DoJ has said this guy was talking out his arse.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 1:39 pm to ohnoletsgeaux
quote:Oh so now we believe the DOJ
Justice Department disputes Glenn Prager's Epstein investigation role
I'm not saying they're lying and I'm not saying Prager was telling the truth but let's be honest, the DOJs handling of the Epstein situation has been far from perfect and Prager's story about the cases is not unbelievable at all. If he's telling the truth, it would simply be more testimony of what everyone already suspects. Even before this OP, people were claiming the DOJ, while they had released a trove, were still withholding some key info, which has led to speculation about the motive for withholding, if true.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News