Started By
Message

re: Senators Request Trump Action on Ethanol

Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:36 pm to
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:36 pm to
Ethanol is one of the biggest lies humankind has ever created.
Posted by Jeff Goldblum
Gardner, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1039 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

On a serious note... Methanol is where it is at if the U.S wants to move to a cleaner, much more cost effective way to supplement gasoline.


Actually butanol is the way to go. Production costs would need to come down, but it's a clean, low CO2, transportable, stable fuel that can be produced from plants. Has much higher MPG than ethanol.
Posted by fjlee90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
7836 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:45 pm to
Little to none actually. Europe is tinkering with the idea more so than the U.S. It is approved here to blend up to 5%, but there is such a hard on for ethanol here that it is not as common of a practice. Much more common in marine fuel applications though.

The RVP is a bit higher in methanol, but it still suffices at concentrations less than 15%.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118773 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:46 pm to
Just a little industry secret here. Well something that the public does not know about.

When gasoline and ethanol are blended there is an energy per unit volume reduction. In other words you are going to get less gas millage from ethanol blended gasoline versus pure gasoline. I think everyone knows this.

Here's the little secret. When ethanol and gasoline are mixed there is a net increase in volume. For example, a mixture of one hundred gallons of ethanol added to 900 gallons of gasoline will add up to more than 1000 gallons of blended fuel. IIRC the final volume would be about 1000.25 gallons. I know a quarter of a gallon doesn't seem like a lot however for blenders that run on very low margins but very high volumes (100s of millions of bbls per year) you can make some very nice executive bonuses at the end of the year. Million of dollars in fact.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118773 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:50 pm to
Hell, we should just blend nitro methane. Everyone's car would run fantastic.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37523 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:52 pm to
I'm looking into starting a company extracting methanol and stillingia oil from invasive tallow trees. 1 acre of tallow seeds yields 1,200 gallons of oil.
Posted by fjlee90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
7836 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

GumboPot



This guy gets it
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118773 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Actually butanol is the way to go. Production costs would need to come down, but it's a clean, low CO2, transportable, stable fuel that can be produced from plants. Has much higher MPG than ethanol.




Butanol is a better fuel source than ethanol. However, as I understand it the plant source saccharification process is pretty expensive (for the microorganisms...a bacteria in the genius Clostridium that produce butanol). That's the drawback as I understand it.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118773 posts
Posted on 10/26/17 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

I'm looking into starting a company extracting methanol and stillingia oil from invasive tallow trees. 1 acre of tallow seeds yields 1,200 gallons of oil.


Awesome idea. Good luck.

Didn't know about stillingia oil until now. Thanks.
Posted by Lutcher Lad
South of the Mason-Dixon Line
Member since Sep 2009
5757 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 7:34 am to
Obama administration was set to raise ethanol limit to 15%. It really screws up your engine and boaters especially hate it. Back in the day it tore up rubber hoses and fuel lines.
The politicians don't get it...Corn is for eating!
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34909 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Ethanol needs to the way of the dodo bird. It's made gas more expensive, burns gas faster, fricks up our vehicle's engines, and costs more money to produce than pure gas. frick the welfare queens in Iowa that pushed their bullshite on the rest of us and frick George Bush for caving to them.


In fairness, Sent...the whole Ethanol thing began as an 'America First' policy. And for independence from ME Oil, as things were before the Fracking breakout.

A lot invested in Ethanol now; we don't want to harm Farmers, so there needs to be a weaning process, perhaps with International Markets being encouraged (subsidized partially) by our Government. Which is what other Governments do.

Mud on the wall. But I know enough not to put ethanol in my small engines or boat outboard.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:03 am to
quote:

All things being equal, I'd rather pay corn farmers than those Middle Eastern fuggers who financed 9/11.

We don't need the ME for oil brah

And we don't need corn in our gas
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:08 am to

Lib logic: Produce something flawed...then instead of doing away with it...just force Americans to spend more money.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:21 am to
quote:

I really wish ethanol free did not cost so much it makes cars run so much better.


Supply and demand my friend. Get rid of the mandated alcohol and the real stuff will drop in price.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51608 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:49 am to
quote:

All things being equal, I'd rather pay corn farmers than those Middle Eastern fuggers who financed 9/11.

However it seems like a questionable strategy to subsidize a food source to get it sucked into your energy supply.


1. We get minimal oil from the Middle East.
2. Vehicles running on ethanol-enhanced gasoline get 15%-27% less MPG (depending on ethanol content) due to ethanol's lower energy content.
3. Ethanol causes damage to your engine that pure gasoline does not (corrosion from the alcohol, water accumulation in the fuel).
4. While ethanol use reduces CO2, it increases ground-level ozone (O3).

While the bill Bush II pushed through Congress has helped the US farmer stay afloat (and even prosper), the fact that it's due to a mandate means it's a house of cards and it effects most (if not all) agriculture.

My family has farmed for generations and we currently benefit from the ethanol bill. I have "skin in the game" as it were. With that said, I want the ethanol mandate repealed.

If Congress wants to protect the American farmer (and to an extent we should, I mean... if you enjoy being able to eat) then come up with some other plan that isn't equivalent to pissing on the legs of everyone and telling them it's just raining.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67909 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:51 am to
That stuff is horrible in marine engines.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Obama administration was set to raise ethanol limit to 15%.


Yep. Service department manager at the Toyota place I trade with told me my 2003 Tundra is engineered to run with up to 12% ethanol but not 15%. Same thing with my wife's 2008 4Runner. Told me this about four years ago. Luckily some stations locally starting selling corn free gas.
Posted by ClampClampington
Nebraska
Member since Jun 2017
3967 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:41 am to
Ethanol is a legitimate market that the world is demanding. Exports have skyrocketed the past few years with countries in SAM/Asia/India depending on cheap ethanol to meet their growing economies' fuel demand.

Federal subsidies went away years ago. And guess what, those profitable in the ethanol industry were ecstatic. Truth was there were too many "mom and pop" plants that were in production who could not survive without those subsidies. Those plants are now closed or were taken over by those who had the resources to run efficiently.

People confuse the subsidies that used to exist with the ethanol mandate (RFS). The mandate still exists, and it's a meaningless piece of paper that makes green earthers feel good. If the mandate went away tomorrow, the ethanol market would have a little disruption, then return to status quo. The worldwide demand for ethanol exceeds the mandate. That little ethanol plant on the edge of town isn't selling to the local 7-11 (most of that's imported from SAM), all of its ethanol is going out on trains to be loaded onto barges. Don't like ethanol, don't buy it. But it's not going anywhere
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72079 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:44 am to
quote:



Personally, I liked it better when we were just paying corn farmers to grow food.

Ethanol is a stupid product on just about every level.
This.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Correct. Ethanol fricked up my yard equipment until I starting using this.

Want to know something better than Sta-Bil for everything except your vehcile? Non-ethanol gas.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram