- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Senator Josh Hawley Reintroduces the Pelosi Act
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:16 pm
LINK
quote:
Everyone who watches American politics, and who hasn't been living under a flat rock for the last few decades, is aware of that mysterious process by which elected officials in the House of Representatives and the Senate grow monstrously rich on their modest salaries.
It is (and let's say this quietly) called "graft."
A lot of this comes from members of Congress being made aware of information that could affect various publicly traded corporations, information that is not available to the general public. They then act on that information and score.
This is called "insider trading," and it's against the law, unless you're a member of Congress. But Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) is aiming to fix that, and to that end he has reintroduced the delightfully-named Pelosi Act.
quote:
Hawley's ban would prohibit lawmakers and their spouses from holding, purchasing or selling stocks for the duration of the lawmaker's time in office. Lawmakers would be allowed to invest in diversified mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, or U.S. Treasury bonds while in office.
If passed, current lawmakers would have 180 days to comply with the legislation. Likewise, newly elected lawmakers must achieve compliance within 180 days of entering office.
Lawmakers who continue to make wrongful transactions under the law would be required to hand over any profits they made to the U.S. Treasury Department. The House or Senate ethics committees could also impose a fine on such lawmakers amounting to 10% of each wrongful transaction.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:18 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Pelosi-Tuberville
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:19 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Should be a slam dunk.
It will go nowhere.
It will go nowhere.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:20 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Can’t wait to hear the crawfishing from those who vote this down.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:21 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
What side will the AOC/Bernie wing come down on?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:22 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Eye patch McCain going to threaten to kill him
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:23 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Lawmakers who continue to make wrongful transactions under the law would be required to hand over any profits they made to the U.S. Treasury Department. The House or Senate ethics committees could also impose a fine on such lawmakers amounting to 10% of each wrongful transaction.
Well this is bullshite. Lawmakers who continue to make wrongful transactions should have their profits taken and be kicked outta Congress.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:23 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
What side will the AOC/Bernie wing come down on?
Depends on whether or not Trump supports it.
Damn. 4 mad AOC and Bernie lovers. Weird.
This post was edited on 4/28/25 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:23 pm to the808bass
It will fail buy i want to see them go on record and vote.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:26 pm to the808bass
quote:
Should be a slam dunk.
It will go nowhere
Yuuuuuuup.
I'd be willing to compromise however. They must give an advance 10 day notice or something that they are buying/selling.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:26 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
A couple of items:
Existing stocks would be required to be placed in some sort of blind trust, right? Because that's bullshite to force someone to divest of stocks they already own prior to the law being enacted. Otherwise, super! Let's do it.
Existing stocks would be required to be placed in some sort of blind trust, right? Because that's bullshite to force someone to divest of stocks they already own prior to the law being enacted. Otherwise, super! Let's do it.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:28 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Should also include crypto and the executive branch as well.
This is a good start though. Naming is pretty funny.
This is a good start though. Naming is pretty funny.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:59 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
What side will the AOC/Bernie wing come down on?
Didn’t AOC co sponsor this with Hawley the first time?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:05 pm to JackaReaux
quote:
Pelosi-Tuberville
Can you explain the Tuberville?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:02 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Nice thought but chicken feed fellas.
The CHIPS ACT was 280 billion and immediately upon signing Pelosi hopped on a jet with her kid and traveled to Taiwan (pissing off the chinese to no end because she was the highest ranked to visit) and to South Korea.......now why on earth would she do that?????
And it happens 100s of times annually from ALL higher ranked govt officials. You dont think the person approving stacey abrams 2 billion got a piece of the 20 billion they socked away? One of the biden clan running the EPA granted money to a former business partners ngo and stuffed it in a bank holding acct before he walked out the door.
The stock transactions are just the very tip of the iceberg.
The CHIPS ACT was 280 billion and immediately upon signing Pelosi hopped on a jet with her kid and traveled to Taiwan (pissing off the chinese to no end because she was the highest ranked to visit) and to South Korea.......now why on earth would she do that?????
And it happens 100s of times annually from ALL higher ranked govt officials. You dont think the person approving stacey abrams 2 billion got a piece of the 20 billion they socked away? One of the biden clan running the EPA granted money to a former business partners ngo and stuffed it in a bank holding acct before he walked out the door.
The stock transactions are just the very tip of the iceberg.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:10 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:34 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
A lot of this comes from members of Congress being made aware of information that could affect various publicly traded corporations, information that is not available to the general public. They then act on that information and score.
AKA "insider trading."
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:36 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Pelosi and Hammer Boy would never go along with this.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:38 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
It’s a start.
More needed.
Much more.
More needed.
Much more.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 5:34 pm to Ag Zwin
The day before biden mandated the use of EV's, Pelosi & battered husband each purchased $500,000 worth of Tesla stock. Within the next mth, they purchased a $20,000,000 mansion in Fla. She consistently kept a bill similar as Hawley's from leaving a committee, preventing it from being voted on. Everyone in Congress knows this, thus Hawley's mocking her.
Popular
Back to top
