- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:07 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
The wise latina says this will have “grave consequences”
Doesnt matter bitch. Not your job to worry about consequences.
Is it constitutional or not? Thats your job.
Doesnt matter bitch. Not your job to worry about consequences.
Is it constitutional or not? Thats your job.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:19 pm to Cosmo
Other than the great news, the best part of this thread is everyone (except one poster) completely ignoring SFP.

Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:22 pm to lsursb
quote:
So, I no longer have to have Cleo as my representative?
As someone who went from Lindy Boggs to William Jailbird Jefferson, I will smile for you and watch the arguments "He's so valuable to the district in his current leadership location" as all the wannabe leaders undermine him quietly.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Thoughts and prayers SFP
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:53 pm to scrooster
Motion for hearing was filed today in LA Supreme Court to decide a new map.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:18 pm to Bourbon Bebe
Early voting starts Saturday. Will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:31 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Is it constitutional or not? Thats your job.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
Kagan lost it: Section 2 is essentially a "DEAD LETTER"
"The consequences are likely to be far-reaching and grave."
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:34 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Early voting starts Saturday. Will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Some mail in ballots have been sent in at this point too. I guess this falls under the Purcell principle maybe, I’m not sure if this qualifies as a “rules” change or not.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:41 pm to Zap Rowsdower
We are going have the most beautiful maps
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:44 pm to Huge Richard
quote:
We are going have the most beautiful map
You’re gonna love it!
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:44 pm to Ailsa
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
Democrats don't have a House majority without those court-ordered maps.
A dozen of their current seats sit in districts that only exist because federal courts FORCED states to draw them
Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina — every one has at least one Democrat seat in a court-created black-majority district
Their House margin is FOUR seats
SCOTUS just made 12 of their 213 seats legally redrawable
Republican-led legislatures don't need new voters — they need a redistricting committee and a Tuesday afternoon
If race-based districts are unconstitutional, then Louisiana redraws.
If Louisiana redraws, then Alabama redraws.
If Alabama redraws, then every Southern state redraws.
If every Southern state redraws, the Democrat House majority was a 60-year courtroom artifact — not an election result.
That's what nobody is saying out loud.
The 2026 midterms were just decided 6-3 — six months before Election Day.
.
This post was edited on 4/29/26 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:51 pm to lsursb
Cleo never did "represent" you.....seriously!
Great day for America!
Great day for America!
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:36 pm to Bard
Ok it’s getting confusing to me. Can some one explain how a districting map is supposed to be properly drawn? Is population based and then so many parishes out from an epicenter? Do the shapes of the districts have certain shapes or boundary guidelines to follow?
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:42 pm to SlickRick55
quote:
Ok it’s getting confusing to me. Can some one explain how a districting map is supposed to be properly drawn? Is population based and then so many parishes out from an epicenter? Do the shapes of the districts have certain shapes or boundary guidelines to follow?
First they'll use Ai to draw the maps based on population as per current laws dictate ... not on race.
It's 100x faster than doing it the old way. This way they'll get it done before the Midterms.
Then they have committees, governed by strict rules, touch up any potential overlaps or fuzzy parts.
Matter of fact, in Florida it's already done. I suspect it's already done in Louisiana as well tbh.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:12 pm to SlickRick55
quote:
Ok it’s getting confusing to me. Can some one explain how a districting map is supposed to be properly drawn? Is population based and then so many parishes out from an epicenter? Do the shapes of the districts have certain shapes or boundary guidelines to follow?
Well, as I understand it, it is confusing, from a "what it should be and what it is" view. I'm certain the intent was always that the districts should represent a cross section of the State. But if politicians are involved in the map, they are going to try to game it to their advantage. That's what they do. And if the laws allow it, there you are.
Last time I researched it, there is an 'open maps' group, and they have developed algorithms for it. As you say, start from the population centers, work outwards until you hit geographical or municipal boundaries, and reiterate until you have an equal population in each of the districts for that State.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:14 pm to L.A.
quote:Cracking and packing. Two different methods of dividing districts.
minority citizens are going to be cracked out of the process."
I'm not familiar with the term. What does "cracked out of the process" mean?
quote:
Cracking and packing (often combined with or related to stacking) are primary gerrymandering techniques used to manipulate voting districts for partisan or racial advantage.
Cracking splits a voting bloc across multiple districts to dilute its power, while packing concentrates a group into one district to reduce its influence elsewhere.
1. Cracking (Diluting Power) Definition: Splitting a community of interest or political group among multiple districts. Purpose: To make the group a minority in many districts, preventing them from electing their preferred candidates. Example: A city that is heavily Democratic is split into three different districts that are otherwise surrounded by rural Republican voters, ensuring the Democratic vote is never large enough to win any of the three districts.
2. Packing (Concentrating Power) Definition: Consolidating as many of the opposition party’s voters as possible into a few, limited districts. Purpose: To reduce the opposition's voting strength in all other surrounding districts. Example: Concentrating all minority voters in a city into one single district, where they might win with 90% of the vote, rather than having them spread out to win 55% of the vote in two or three districts.
3. Stacking (Combined Submerging) Definition: A form of packing that combines a minority group with a larger, dissimilar population that consistently outvotes them. Purpose: Historically, this often involved creating large, multi-member districts where a concentrated minority population is overwhelmed by a larger, often higher-income or different-race majority. Example: Placing low-income, minority voters in the same district as higher-income voters who turn out at higher rates, thus "stacking" the deck against the minority group's preferred candidate.
This post was edited on 4/29/26 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:18 pm to bhtigerfan
Nice explanation of the cracking, packing and stacking phraseology.

Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:28 pm to laxtonto
quote:+1 But we need some sort of 'open source' neutral system in place to design the map.
Run on forcing “gerrymandering-free” districts across the entire nation
quote:Sounds good, but they seem to be OK opposing the Voter ID bill, so I'm not feeling so confident here.
and force the dems on voting against it and have them explain why they are against the idea or embrace it and provide more competitive R races in the blue states.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 8:45 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Not your job to worry about consequences. Is it constitutional or not? Thats your job.
I wish I could give this more than one upvote. This is so right, and so few people understand it.
This post was edited on 4/29/26 at 8:46 pm
Popular
Back to top


1







