re: Scanning unverified ballots multiple times

Trump hired two separate firms to investigate voter fraud. The result was disastrous for Trump and his many claims.

quote:

---

“No substantive voter fraud was uncovered in my investigations looking for it, nor was I able to confirm any of the outside claims of voter fraud that I was asked to look at,” he told the Post. “Every fraud claim I was asked to investigate was false.”
Block said he recently met with special counsel Jack Smith, the federal investigator into Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Campaign finance records show the campaign paid Block’s firm about $750,000, starting just days after the election.
A similar firm, Berkeley Research Group, was hired by the Trump campaign to investigate fraud claims. Like Simpatico, Berkeley did not find evidence of fraud or that the election was stolen.

---

LINK

quote:

---

This Forum is not totally blind, so attempts to buck up the idea that the {naked) "Emperor has no clothes", will not cut it.

---

But this forum clings dearly to the idea that their naked Emporer is wearing beautiful clothes.

If you want to believe the GBI, FBI, and previously faithful US Attorneys are all part of a conspiracy, then go right ahead.

But the question was why has no one "brought charges against these people and forced them to explain it?" I provided the answer. The entire event has already been investigated and the explanations provided and found to be credible and not chargeable. How is anyone going to convince a court to re-open the issue?

quote:

---

This event was investigated fully by the GBI, with assistance from the FBI. Their report is available online.

---

I’ve read it multiple times and have had this back and forth with you. “Investigated Fully” is a matter of opinion. What the investigation uncovered was simply 1. The people there doing the counting were told to stay after the media and watchers left, 2. The poll watchers were not told specifically to leave 3. The storage practices of the ballots was normal and appropriate

They were not concerned at all with:

1. Who told everyone to leave? (It was Rubys daughter, but in her interview downplayed that it was indeed her). Ruby said it was a “management decision” to pack up and continue the next day (her daughter was the manger, as per her boss). So was that decision to resume the next day communicated to the media and poll watchers?

2. Why was Ruby still there, and why did she so frantically participate in a job she was not assigned to (in which she acknowledged that all other temporary workers were dismissed)?

3. The comment Ruby’s daughter made about RELYING on her mother being there because of her experience and knowing how to diagnose problems, despite the fact that it was established in the report that ruby’s daughter WAS IN CHARGE of the entire operation.

4. Rubys daughter said the election chief came and explained that the job wasn’t done, so they resumed. Others said the same. But the election chief, and video footage shows that he took a call 10 minutes later which sparked the directive to continue counting. The elections director confirmed he made the call and said to count EVERYTHING, not just what was already opened.

5. They broke the seals of the ballot boxes because they had to count everything there (or every envelope that had been opened, it’s unclear). They were sealed specifically to resume the next day, but each witness said they had to put them back up in a similar manner, sealing them when they actually finished and departed.

6. Why were they not transparent with the poll watchers about what was left to be completed?

or finally simply asking the question:

Was it appropriate to continue counting, after acknowledging that the media had already announced counting had concluded and watchers were not present? They said they called workers back, but did not call the media.

Oh, and Why did Ruby hire Hunter Biden’s defense attorney, who was part of the Biden transition team? Go read her interview again, she says nothing and asks for a lawyer.

quote:

---

If you want to believe the GBI, FBI, and previously faithful US Attorneys are all part of a conspiracy, then go right ahead.

---

Do you want to believe government employees, or people trained to audit and opine on control systems? Because nobody in the latter group thinks the most liberal election systems operate in adequate control environments. The risk of fraud is all that matters. Go read your report again. At the end of Jones interview, he acknowledges that a human’s judgement is necessary to not scan ballots twice. The only control on that is that the public has the right to be present.

quote:

---

But the question was why has no one "brought charges against these people and forced them to explain it?" I provided the answer. The entire event has already been investigated and the explanations provided and found to be credible and not chargeable. How is anyone going to convince a court to re-open the issue?

---

You are correct that the investigation makes it hard to take further legal action, it clearly worked on you. I don’t personally find anything credible about it at all.

quote:

---

The same one that Philip Stark, the University of Cal–Berkeley statistics professor widely recognized as the creator of risk-limiting audits said was no risk-limiting audit, whatsoever?

---

How about a link?

You are either completely ignorant or avoiding what common sense should provide you. I would guess you are a flat earther by your ignorance. A grade school child can common sense wise see what happened. Why would any reasonable person with a iq above 40 say yeah they brought in 100s of lawyers to keep the examination of the ballots to be halted? If it’s all on the up and up why fight is it so hard? You know why and it is pitiful that someone would root for election transparency to be fought so heavily if the election was legit. You are a fraud and everyone here sees that. Congrats at being so dense and against a democratic republic.

quote:

---

Another airheaded, useless post.

---

The irony is thick and hilarious.

quote:

---

The irony is thick and hilarious.

---

What's funny is your lack of understanding of the meaning of the word irony.

Why don't you explain why what I posted is ironic to confirm your ignorance?

quote:

---

This event was investigated fully by the GBI, with assistance from the FBI. Their report is available online.

---

I never saw an explanation of the video of poll workers sending the observers home for the night due to a “water leak” at the vote counting center and then pulling racks of ballots out and running them through the tabulators over and over. If there was an explanation I did not see it.

The only thing that I did see was Ruby Freeman talking about it in a very negative way (i.e. illegal) and evidently that got put aside since she won her massive judgement against Giulliani.