- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SC Jack Smith admitted the FBI added cover sheets to alleged class docs found at MAL
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:58 am
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:58 am
16
Posted on 6/25/24 at 11:59 am to boomtown143
What are we gonna do about it?
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:01 pm to Purple Spoon
So, what does Cannon do about it?
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:10 pm to boomtown143
We(our government) have become the enemy.
We have become what we think we despise.
But, you can’t explain this to far left leaners, they will never get it.
We have become what we think we despise.
But, you can’t explain this to far left leaners, they will never get it.
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:14 pm to boomtown143
What do you think that means?
(I genuinely don’t know.)
(I genuinely don’t know.)
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:17 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
What do you think that means?
I think it means the FBI tampered with evidence.
At least that’s how it looks on the surface.
This post was edited on 6/25/24 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:19 pm to Godfather1
quote:
I think it means the FBI tampered with evidence.
Here is where he argues with you all while pretending not to know.
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:19 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
What do you think that means?
(I genuinely don’t know.)
To me it means they intentionally took these photos for the sole purpose of leaking them to the press to make Trump look bad.
There's no reason to add a cover page that says "classified" (or whatever else) for a photo that will be reviewed by people who can view classified materials.
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:20 pm to Godfather1
possibly even tampered with evidence? if the photos were intended to deceive?
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:20 pm to imjustafatkid
I don't know what's normal or what's not, but that certainly seems to be the allegation here.
Whether or not it's purely spectacle for the press or also has some legal/prosecutorial significance (beyond the absurdity of doing it for negative press) - no idea
Whether or not it's purely spectacle for the press or also has some legal/prosecutorial significance (beyond the absurdity of doing it for negative press) - no idea
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:22 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I don't know what's normal or what's not, but that certainly seems to be the allegation here.
Whether or not it's purely spectacle for the press or also has some legal/prosecutorial significance (beyond the absurdity of doing it for negative press) - no idea
Definitely gives the appearance of impropriety. Very stupid thing to do really. Even if they actually believed Trump was trying to "steal documents" (hard to believe anyone is that stupid), why would you then do something that makes it look like the government planted evidence?
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:28 pm to TDTOM
No, I really don’t know the protocol or what it suggests. The “staged photo for the media” angle sounds most plausible.
Devil’s advocate would be a possible jury could not see the document itself but could be instructed it was classified at X level. The cover page would be to show where they found it but not allow the substance of the document to be read.
I would think the SC responds to this filing and explains its purpose.
Devil’s advocate would be a possible jury could not see the document itself but could be instructed it was classified at X level. The cover page would be to show where they found it but not allow the substance of the document to be read.
I would think the SC responds to this filing and explains its purpose.
This post was edited on 6/25/24 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:28 pm to Godfather1
quote:
quote:What do you think that means? I think it means the FBI tampered with evidence. At least that’s how it looks on the surface.
And people like boozieman are fine with that. Who cares if the government is misleading the public? Not a big deal
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:29 pm to boomtown143
Why would Jack doctor the evidence like this?
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:30 pm to Purple Spoon
quote:
What are we gonna do about it?
File a brief in Judge Cannon's court and let her rule and determine relief, if any. Normal judicial proceedings.
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:34 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
he “staged photo for the media” angle sounds most plausible.
Uh oh...you are beginning to sound like a Conservative Treehouse nut.
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:34 pm to Purple Spoon
quote:
What are we gonna do about it?
Bitch about it on TigerDroppings.
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:37 pm to boomtown143
But it’s totally not a political witch hunt. 
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:38 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Devil’s advocate would be a possible jury could not see the document itself but could be instructed it was classified at X level. The cover page would be to show where they found it but not allow the substance of the document to be read.
If only there was a Special Master to sort out all the classified and unclassified material.
Note, there is no classified material. Trump is not even being charged with mishandling or possessing classified material. There is only material with classified markings that the National Security Division of the DOJ deems ownership of.
Posted on 6/25/24 at 12:39 pm to TDTOM
quote:
So, what does Cannon do about it?
To me, it looks like she is running out the clock to November. If Trump loses this election, DOJ will continue this against Trump and will add her to their list. She may as well dismiss it all and disqualify Smith based on his appointment etc.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News