- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ruth Bader Ginsburg was on the bench for oral arguments today and asking questions
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:36 pm to MrLSU
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:36 pm to MrLSU
quote:
It is really unfortunate the USSC doesn’t allow video of the proceedings so the public can understand the judicial process. I think the American Public would be marginally more informed with TV cameras in the courtroom. It’s archaic that it’s not allowed.
Most people would have absolutely no idea what the Justices and lawyers were talking about. Justice Scalia said he would be for it if he thought people would learn, but he didn't think most people would get anything from it.
Also, all of the arguments are audio recorded, so it's not like you're missing anything.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:39 pm to KCT
quote:
integrity attached to that thread.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:45 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Brosef Stalin
If ignorance really is bliss, then you must be ecstatic.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:52 pm to boosiebadazz
She is alive, there is no body double. There is enough real conspiracy, this one is far fetched. (Just like the Chicago police caught Jussie's lies) If RBG were dead we would know about it. If RBG is dead and the bad guys put in a double and got away with it thus far. We all may as well take a fukitall pill.
INB4: when it is proven she is alive... Vox says, that some random chans said she was dead not Q so it is okay.
INB4: when it is proven she is alive... Vox says, that some random chans said she was dead not Q so it is okay.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:57 pm to cajunangelle
Well considering the integrity associated with the Q thread I cannot believe someone would even have the audacity to question the veracity of the information presented there.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:06 pm to boosiebadazz
Being a physician and a believer in parsimonious explanations, I'd go with the fact that this was thoracotomy and pulmonary lobectomy, an operation that would put me home from work for a few weeks to recover from and she's 85 and would be a bit longer recovery, but what the hell...
WWG1WGRBG
WWG1WGRBG
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:11 pm to DelU249
quote:
Who was underneath the bench with their hand up her arse?
Jussie's attackers
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:16 pm to MF Doom
quote:
Do retards really think she's not alive?
Of course. The same people thought our last President was born in Kenya.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:16 pm to boosiebadazz
The 17th letter in the alphabet thread is the most integrity filled most dignified place on the internet. They are safe from anyone questioning any of their 8chan thoughts. And I am not a concern or plane doubter; fig because I spotted a Q in my toast this morning.


Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:20 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Well considering the integrity associated with the Q thread I cannot believe someone would even have the audacity to question the veracity of the information presented there.
Dude you're such a phony. When somebody randomly called you out in the Q thread, you responded within like 5 minutes. That told me that you were reading the Q thread religiously, and when I pointed out how quickly you responded you didn't even deny it. You proceeded to praise the Q thread to the high heavens.
But yet, you come to the main board and completely contradict what you said in that post. Dude, why do you feel the need to be such a two-faced liar? I don't care what you think about Q, but at least be consistent.
PS - And just for the record, I never said RBG was dead. I didn't know. What I did say, and do say, is that an 86 year-old Supreme Court justice who fell and broke 3 ribs, has had cancer surgery, and allegedly also had a bout with pneumonia, needs to show us that her mental & physical status is sufficiently strong for her to continue to be a competent member of the Supreme Court.
I still haven't had anybody give me a valid reason why a 15 minute interview with her would be a bad idea. Just stupid deflections.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:21 pm to cajunangelle
I hope Karla doesn’t attack you for that; I hate to see my buds fight
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:28 pm to KCT
I didn’t praise the Q thread at all. I said it is fascinating, and it is.
I’m not duplicitous; I think you’re a quack and I think Q is an incredible hoax perpetrated on you guys.
Doesn’t mean it’s not fascinating to watch unfold.
And you'll be able to listen to RBG and judge her lucidity soon
I’m not duplicitous; I think you’re a quack and I think Q is an incredible hoax perpetrated on you guys.
Doesn’t mean it’s not fascinating to watch unfold.
And you'll be able to listen to RBG and judge her lucidity soon
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:37 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
Yep, all the audio is available to be listened to on the oyez project website. In fact audio from EVERY CASE since they started recording them many decades ago are on there. It’s an absolute treasure trove of history and it’s all available for free.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:39 pm to boosiebadazz
Forgive me if I dont give a damn that a punk-arse troll, who won't even admit to being a liberal, just called me a quack.
PS - I noticed that you chose to ignore my commentary about RBG. After everything she's been thru since November (broken ribs, cancer, pneumonia at age 85), you honestly don't have any concerns about her health status? It's not like she's a clerk in your ambulance-chasing law firm, boosie. She's a Supreme Court justice. For all intents and purposes, we haven't seen her since before Christmas. And when is the last time we actually HEARD from her?
Anybody here who says that they have no concerns about the health status of this 86 year-old Supreme Court justice, who has had multiple injuries and illnesses since right before Thanksgiving, is either straight-up lying or just plain stupid. Or both.
PS - I noticed that you chose to ignore my commentary about RBG. After everything she's been thru since November (broken ribs, cancer, pneumonia at age 85), you honestly don't have any concerns about her health status? It's not like she's a clerk in your ambulance-chasing law firm, boosie. She's a Supreme Court justice. For all intents and purposes, we haven't seen her since before Christmas. And when is the last time we actually HEARD from her?
Anybody here who says that they have no concerns about the health status of this 86 year-old Supreme Court justice, who has had multiple injuries and illnesses since right before Thanksgiving, is either straight-up lying or just plain stupid. Or both.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:41 pm to KCT
quote:
PS - I noticed that you chose to ignore my commentary about RBG. After everything she's been thru since November (broken ribs, cancer, pneumonia at age 85), you honestly don't have any concerns about her health status? It's not like she's a clerk in your ambulance-chasing law firm, boosie. She's a Supreme Court justice. For all intents and purposes, we haven't seen her since before Christmas. And when is the last time we actually HEARD from her?
Anybody here who says that they have no concerns about the health status of this 86 year-old Supreme Court justice, who has had multiple injuries and illnesses since right before Thanksgiving, is either straight-up lying or just plain stupid. Or both.
Concern in that she's old and in frail health? Sure.
Concern in that she's a body double and the Deep State is using a plant to deny Trump another nomination? Nope.
But I don't think Ruth Bader Ginsburg owes you, me, or any of you Q wackos proof of life.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:46 pm to KCT
quote:The mad ramblings of a quack who's just had another delusion go belly up
Forgive me if I dont give a damn that a punk-arse troll, who won't even admit to being a liberal, just called me a quack.
PS - I noticed that you chose to ignore my commentary about RBG. After everything she's been thru since November (broken ribs, cancer, pneumonia at age 85), you honestly don't have any concerns about her health status? It's not like she's a clerk in your ambulance-chasing law firm, boosie. She's a Supreme Court justice. For all intents and purposes, we haven't seen her since before Christmas. And when is the last time we actually HEARD from her?
Anybody here who says that they have no concerns about the health status of this 86 year-old Supreme Court justice, who has had multiple injuries and illnesses since right before Thanksgiving, is either straight-up lying or just plain stupid. Or both.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:49 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
It is really unfortunate the USSC doesn’t allow video of the proceedings so the public can understand the judicial process
SCOTUS is not the judicial process (i.e., no jury, no judge, no introduction of evidence, objections, etc.). It's purely an appellate process and the oral argument is just that - each side attempting to present its case while being interrupted/barraged by any number of the Justices.
Popular
Back to top



2









