re: Ruth Bader Ginsburg was on the bench for oral arguments today and asking questions

I'd like to see cameras, but Oyez has audio recordings up soon after argument. Looks like the citizenship question case was argued today.

LINK

Maybe you guys can hear her questions and judge accordingly once the audio is uploaded

quote:

---

Make Monumental Memories was an ad campaign from 2017

---

The TMZ article was also from April 2018 but they did have one of her yesterday from the Airport that was legit.

quote:

---

Keep LARP in the LARP thread

---

quote:

---

Make Monumental Memories was an ad campaign from 2017

---

You'll have to be less cryptic with your point outside of a cheerleader thread.

You posted a screenshot from a TMZ article from April of 18, with a link to information about an ad campaign that is advertised on a window of an airport.

So, what's your point? And how does your evidence support your point?

Conclusory statements, cryptic arguments, etc. are only adequate in echo chambers.

quote:

---

You totally misread my reason for actually wanting to see her have to function in public.

---

I didn't misread shite.

You can crawfish or have multiple reasons for wanting this interview, but your post was in response to someone clowning about you making it sound as if there was 0% chance that she attended the concert. You can crawfish all you want about your 15 minute interview, but you're full of shite if you say that part of your argument wasnt about her not doing an interview as somewhat of a proof of life used to shut up the left and how that just didn't make sense.

That is all of these people's issue. You don't see how harmful it is to state shite that you cannot prove as fact? Quit that stupid shite and learn how to support your positions intelligently.

"RBG definitely wasn't at the concert" is not how you support that position.

"I just find it weird that there wasn't more coverage of RBG at this concert. Also, why was this concert not on the calendar...how do they not double book if nobody knows about the private events...doesn't rbg's kin run this bitch...etc...etc.

I don't know if she was there, but this shite sure seems a little fishy."

The former gets you categorized as a tinfoil wearing loon, who doesn't need evidence to make conclusions. The ladder gets you characterized as a reasonable person, who uses evidence, or lack there of, to question narratives, that he cannot prove wrong, but thinks there might be an issue.

quote:

---

Do you really want someone who could be feeble & mentally impaired serving on the Supreme Court?



Reading her opinions, that would have kept her off the court 26 years ago. 

She's always been feeble and mentally impaired.

---

Well, she's certainly been a radical Leftist for the entire time, and even before then. But now, after falling and breaking 3 ribs, after cancer surgery, and allegedly a bout with pneumonia at almost 86 years of age, I think the status of her mental & physical state is more than a valid concern.

The left had a field day with “Where is Melania!?” Speculating that she had run away or that Trump had murdered her when she went a couple weeks without a public appearance. Turnabout is fair play with RBG

quote:

---

Would it kill her to

---

of course it would. that's kinda the whole point of having her avoid anything and everything, DO NOT DIE YET RBG... they need you to stay alive 6 more years.