- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ruth Bader Ginsburg was on the bench for oral arguments today and asking questions
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:51 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:51 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Concern in that she's old and in frail health? Sure.
Okay, so what's your problem with her doing an interview and removing all doubt?
quote:
But I don't think Ruth Bader Ginsburg owes you, me, or any of you Q wackos proof of life.
The woman is a Supreme Court justice, dumbass. She isn't some ambulance chaser like you. She will be 86 years old next month, and she's had at least 3 major health issues since Thanksgiving.
Forget your stupid mantra of proof of life. I'm talking about her current health status. A Supreme Court justice needs to possess more than a beating heart. There's a couple million people right now, if not more, who are alive but couldn't even tell you it's Tuesday today. Do we really want a Supreme Court justice who MIGHT BE mentally impaired or extremely weak physically?
You & Cat Woman can make light of this all you want, but you're both insane if you think the woman doesn't owe us a current look at the state of her health.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:00 pm to KCT
She is a justice for life. There is nothing in the Constitution that says she has to be removed if she is hanging on by a thread and can barely lift her head. Congress has the power to impeach her and remove her if they think she's in that bad of shape. Legally speaking, she could be in a coma and still serve on the court. If Congress doesn't want to act there's not much we can do about it.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:09 pm to KCT
quote:
The woman is a Supreme Court justice, dumbass. She isn't some ambulance chaser like you. She will be 86 years old next month, and she's had at least 3 major health issues since Thanksgiving.
Forget your stupid mantra of proof of life. I'm talking about her current health status. A Supreme Court justice needs to possess more than a beating heart. There's a couple million people right now, if not more, who are alive but couldn't even tell you it's Tuesday today. Do we really want a Supreme Court justice who MIGHT BE mentally impaired or extremely weak physically?
You & Cat Woman can make light of this all you want, but you're both insane if you think the woman doesn't owe us a current look at the state of her health.
She has a lifetime appointment. If her health or her mental health were slipping to the point it was a problem, we would know. She was present in open court for argument today, and she participated. You'll have to wait a few days to hear it. She doesn't owe anyone a periodical sanity checkup because KarlaCircleTiger got excited about a few deltas and Q drops.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:10 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
She is a justice for life. There is nothing in the Constitution that says she has to be removed if she is hanging on by a thread and can barely lift her head
And you think that's a good thing, just because you agree with her radical left-wing views?
If a President can be removed for mental incompetence, then a Supreme Court justice should certainly not have a different standard.
A 1515-minute interview. That's all I want, and she might even surprise me. But, an 86 year-old Supreme Court justice who's had at least 3 major health issues in the past 3 months needs to show us that she's still competent.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:11 pm to KCT
quote:
If a President can be removed for mental incompetence, then a Supreme Court justice should certainly not have a different standard.
Ah, so it's a butthurt thing about McCabe, GEOTUS and the 25th.
Now it makes sense
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:13 pm to KCT
quote:
needs to show us that she's still competent
She participated in open court today
When the audio is posted, I want to see you break down and analyze her questioning in light of the issues presented.
We'll see who is lucid and who is lost real quick
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:18 pm to KCT
quote:
And you think that's a good thing, just because you agree with her radical left-wing views?
You couldn't be farther from the truth.
quote:
If a President can be removed for mental incompetence, then a Supreme Court justice should certainly not have a different standard.
There is a Constitutional amendment specifically relating to the president's health. There is no such amendment relating to a Supreme Court justice.
Were you concerned when McCain stayed in the Senate for an entire year after he announced he was dying of brain cancer? I was and even mentioned it on here. None of his fellow Senators seemed to care though. If RBG was in such bad shape do you think at least one of her fellow justices would say something? Clarence Thomas doesn't care what people think about him. I think he would speak up if he thought she was unfit for work.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:20 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Ah, so it's a butthurt thing about McCabe, GEOTUS and the 25th.
Gosh damn, you're stupid. It has NOTHING to do with McCabe, you stupid bitch.
The woman has had 3 major health issues in 3 months, and you're acting like we shouldn't expect her to show us that she's still mentally and physically competent.
Go chase another ambulance, dumbass.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:22 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
She participated in open court today ?
How did she do? Tell me, genius, since you seem to know.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:26 pm to KCT
quote:
The woman has had 3 major health issues in 3 months, and you're acting like we shouldn't expect her to show us that she's still mentally and physically competent.
she did. She showed up to work and participated in open court. Folks were tweeting about it and nothing sounded out of the ordinary. The audio will be posted soon for your inspection and approval.
Now should we talk about your boy's rambling nonsense the other day when he declared the national emergency? That shite warranted a sanity check, but you don't see me being a whiny bitch about it
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:50 pm to KCT
quote:
Gosh damn, you're stupid. It has NOTHING to do with McCabe, you stupid bitch. The woman has had 3 major health issues in 3 months, and you're acting like we shouldn't expect her to show us that she's still mentally and physically competent. Go chase another ambulance, dumbass.
quote:Boosie gonna boosie but he is spot on with this. And you better watch the personal insults & flaming. You are always so high and mighty on your high horse. RBG was walking through an airport, even if you heard her in court today you would still most likely conspire something nefarious to keep your coveted thread going. Go back to your thread where you are protected before you get banned again for flaming.
The woman is a Supreme Court justice, dumbass. She isn't some ambulance chaser like you. She will be 86 years old next month, and she's had at least 3 major health issues since Thanksgiving.
Forget your stupid mantra of proof of life. I'm talking about her current health status. A Supreme Court justice needs to possess more than a beating heart. There's a couple million people right now, if not more, who are alive but couldn't even tell you it's Tuesday today. Do we really want a Supreme Court justice who MIGHT BE mentally impaired or extremely weak physically?
You & Cat Woman can make light of this all you want, but you're both insane if you think the woman doesn't owe us a current look at the state of her health.
TIA.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:52 pm to boosiebadazz
I am a little frightened that I agree with you.
Love,
Crazy cat lady
Love,
Crazy cat lady
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:56 pm to KCT
Why do I have to be pissed off to point out shitty logic? I'm not a pt board person; I'm an OT person. I only came to the pt, because I honestly believe that Trump is draining the swamp. This is definitely not business as usual.
I also have not ruled out that this Q fellow might be a part of the administration. He's very sharp and very knowledgeable.
However, I also know that a businessman, like trump, would use this shite to his advantage in a heart beat. I also know that some of this conclusion jumping shite does not help attract the "normal" people to participate. It also won't be advantageous if the day comes where these anonymous predictions come true and the world begins to participate.
RBG gets sick + RBG doesn't do an interview does not automatically equal RBG is dead. That kind of ridiculous logic jumps tends to turn people off.
And I've been stirring shite, with good intentions, for a LONG time. Go look. You'll see. You aren't the first person to call me out, and you won't be the last. But I've always got the best intentions. I generally never reply. And, I'm not a foe. I probably want the swamp to drain more than Q does. I hate living in a rigged system.
Some of that dumb shite doesn't help. But many of the posters are great.
I also have not ruled out that this Q fellow might be a part of the administration. He's very sharp and very knowledgeable.
However, I also know that a businessman, like trump, would use this shite to his advantage in a heart beat. I also know that some of this conclusion jumping shite does not help attract the "normal" people to participate. It also won't be advantageous if the day comes where these anonymous predictions come true and the world begins to participate.
RBG gets sick + RBG doesn't do an interview does not automatically equal RBG is dead. That kind of ridiculous logic jumps tends to turn people off.
And I've been stirring shite, with good intentions, for a LONG time. Go look. You'll see. You aren't the first person to call me out, and you won't be the last. But I've always got the best intentions. I generally never reply. And, I'm not a foe. I probably want the swamp to drain more than Q does. I hate living in a rigged system.
Some of that dumb shite doesn't help. But many of the posters are great.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:56 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
If the liberal media will actively participate in the Smollett hoax, and they did, they will also participate in a hoax concerning Ginsberg.
The bitch is dead and there may be someone sitting in her place on the bench but it ain't her.
The bitch is dead and there may be someone sitting in her place on the bench but it ain't her.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:04 pm to bmy
quote:
Keep LARP in the LARP thread
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:09 pm to TSLG
quote:Well said.
The former gets you categorized as a tinfoil wearing loon, who doesn't need evidence to make conclusions. The ladder gets you characterized as a reasonable person, who uses evidence, or lack there of, to question narratives, that he cannot prove wrong, but thinks there might be an issue.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:09 pm to FredBear
quote:
The bitch is dead and there may be someone sitting in her place on the bench but it ain't her.
It's possible, but it sounds crazy when you state it as fact, with the amount of information available to the public.
Don't go to the Q thread yet. There's enough of you there already.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:14 pm to AggieHank86
I honestly hoped she's still alive because this year is too early for the full tilt glorious melt to come to fruition.
It HAS to happen early next year so we get the full treatment of liberal melt about it can't happen in an election year.
Think about it:
- Replace lib with conservative.
- Replace during election year after the 2016 Scalia victory.
- Replace while Trump! is "under investigation", or "colluding colluding", or "trailing in polls", or "restarting the KKK", or "insert_melter_here".
Please, God, let me live through Jan 2021 at minimum. I love you. Thank you. Amen.
It HAS to happen early next year so we get the full treatment of liberal melt about it can't happen in an election year.
Think about it:
- Replace lib with conservative.
- Replace during election year after the 2016 Scalia victory.
- Replace while Trump! is "under investigation", or "colluding colluding", or "trailing in polls", or "restarting the KKK", or "insert_melter_here".
Please, God, let me live through Jan 2021 at minimum. I love you. Thank you. Amen.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:23 pm to Meauxjeaux
Everybody knows she's a lefty on the court. Everybody expects her decisions/votes have a lefty tilt. My only beef with her recently was that she wasn't present to question/hear arguments in person. If she's present and participating in the case, I may not agree with her positions but she is active in each case.
Conservative or liberal, they need to be present and participating in the process. Interns and assistants should not be deciding cases, simply because they weren't run through the wringer of Senate approval.
Conservative or liberal, they need to be present and participating in the process. Interns and assistants should not be deciding cases, simply because they weren't run through the wringer of Senate approval.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:35 pm to KCT
quote:
Okay, so what's your problem with her doing an interview and removing all doubt?
The only people with doubts are on special little domestic terrorism watchlists/LARP threads.
Why bother?
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:36 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News