Started By
Message

re: Ruth Bader Ginsburg was on the bench for oral arguments today and asking questions

Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:51 pm to
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Concern in that she's old and in frail health? Sure. 


Okay, so what's your problem with her doing an interview and removing all doubt?

quote:

But I don't think Ruth Bader Ginsburg owes you, me, or any of you Q wackos proof of life.


The woman is a Supreme Court justice, dumbass. She isn't some ambulance chaser like you. She will be 86 years old next month, and she's had at least 3 major health issues since Thanksgiving.

Forget your stupid mantra of proof of life. I'm talking about her current health status. A Supreme Court justice needs to possess more than a beating heart. There's a couple million people right now, if not more, who are alive but couldn't even tell you it's Tuesday today. Do we really want a Supreme Court justice who MIGHT BE mentally impaired or extremely weak physically?

You & Cat Woman can make light of this all you want, but you're both insane if you think the woman doesn't owe us a current look at the state of her health.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39147 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:00 pm to
She is a justice for life. There is nothing in the Constitution that says she has to be removed if she is hanging on by a thread and can barely lift her head. Congress has the power to impeach her and remove her if they think she's in that bad of shape. Legally speaking, she could be in a coma and still serve on the court. If Congress doesn't want to act there's not much we can do about it.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80121 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

The woman is a Supreme Court justice, dumbass. She isn't some ambulance chaser like you. She will be 86 years old next month, and she's had at least 3 major health issues since Thanksgiving.

Forget your stupid mantra of proof of life. I'm talking about her current health status. A Supreme Court justice needs to possess more than a beating heart. There's a couple million people right now, if not more, who are alive but couldn't even tell you it's Tuesday today. Do we really want a Supreme Court justice who MIGHT BE mentally impaired or extremely weak physically?

You & Cat Woman can make light of this all you want, but you're both insane if you think the woman doesn't owe us a current look at the state of her health.


She has a lifetime appointment. If her health or her mental health were slipping to the point it was a problem, we would know. She was present in open court for argument today, and she participated. You'll have to wait a few days to hear it. She doesn't owe anyone a periodical sanity checkup because KarlaCircleTiger got excited about a few deltas and Q drops.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 3:10 pm
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

She is a justice for life. There is nothing in the Constitution that says she has to be removed if she is hanging on by a thread and can barely lift her head


And you think that's a good thing, just because you agree with her radical left-wing views?

If a President can be removed for mental incompetence, then a Supreme Court justice should certainly not have a different standard.

A 1515-minute interview. That's all I want, and she might even surprise me. But, an 86 year-old Supreme Court justice who's had at least 3 major health issues in the past 3 months needs to show us that she's still competent.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80121 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

If a President can be removed for mental incompetence, then a Supreme Court justice should certainly not have a different standard.


Ah, so it's a butthurt thing about McCabe, GEOTUS and the 25th.

Now it makes sense
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80121 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

needs to show us that she's still competent


She participated in open court today

When the audio is posted, I want to see you break down and analyze her questioning in light of the issues presented.

We'll see who is lucid and who is lost real quick
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39147 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

And you think that's a good thing, just because you agree with her radical left-wing views?

You couldn't be farther from the truth.

quote:

If a President can be removed for mental incompetence, then a Supreme Court justice should certainly not have a different standard.

There is a Constitutional amendment specifically relating to the president's health. There is no such amendment relating to a Supreme Court justice.

Were you concerned when McCain stayed in the Senate for an entire year after he announced he was dying of brain cancer? I was and even mentioned it on here. None of his fellow Senators seemed to care though. If RBG was in such bad shape do you think at least one of her fellow justices would say something? Clarence Thomas doesn't care what people think about him. I think he would speak up if he thought she was unfit for work.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Ah, so it's a butthurt thing about McCabe, GEOTUS and the 25th. 




Gosh damn, you're stupid. It has NOTHING to do with McCabe, you stupid bitch.

The woman has had 3 major health issues in 3 months, and you're acting like we shouldn't expect her to show us that she's still mentally and physically competent.

Go chase another ambulance, dumbass.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

She participated in open court today ?


How did she do? Tell me, genius, since you seem to know.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80121 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

The woman has had 3 major health issues in 3 months, and you're acting like we shouldn't expect her to show us that she's still mentally and physically competent.


she did. She showed up to work and participated in open court. Folks were tweeting about it and nothing sounded out of the ordinary. The audio will be posted soon for your inspection and approval.

Now should we talk about your boy's rambling nonsense the other day when he declared the national emergency? That shite warranted a sanity check, but you don't see me being a whiny bitch about it
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 3:27 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146428 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Gosh damn, you're stupid. It has NOTHING to do with McCabe, you stupid bitch. The woman has had 3 major health issues in 3 months, and you're acting like we shouldn't expect her to show us that she's still mentally and physically competent. Go chase another ambulance, dumbass.
quote:

The woman is a Supreme Court justice, dumbass. She isn't some ambulance chaser like you. She will be 86 years old next month, and she's had at least 3 major health issues since Thanksgiving.

Forget your stupid mantra of proof of life. I'm talking about her current health status. A Supreme Court justice needs to possess more than a beating heart. There's a couple million people right now, if not more, who are alive but couldn't even tell you it's Tuesday today. Do we really want a Supreme Court justice who MIGHT BE mentally impaired or extremely weak physically?

You & Cat Woman can make light of this all you want, but you're both insane if you think the woman doesn't owe us a current look at the state of her health.
Boosie gonna boosie but he is spot on with this. And you better watch the personal insults & flaming. You are always so high and mighty on your high horse. RBG was walking through an airport, even if you heard her in court today you would still most likely conspire something nefarious to keep your coveted thread going. Go back to your thread where you are protected before you get banned again for flaming.

TIA.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:33 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146428 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:52 pm to
I am a little frightened that I agree with you.

Love,

Crazy cat lady
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:56 pm to
Why do I have to be pissed off to point out shitty logic? I'm not a pt board person; I'm an OT person. I only came to the pt, because I honestly believe that Trump is draining the swamp. This is definitely not business as usual.

I also have not ruled out that this Q fellow might be a part of the administration. He's very sharp and very knowledgeable.

However, I also know that a businessman, like trump, would use this shite to his advantage in a heart beat. I also know that some of this conclusion jumping shite does not help attract the "normal" people to participate. It also won't be advantageous if the day comes where these anonymous predictions come true and the world begins to participate.

RBG gets sick + RBG doesn't do an interview does not automatically equal RBG is dead. That kind of ridiculous logic jumps tends to turn people off.

And I've been stirring shite, with good intentions, for a LONG time. Go look. You'll see. You aren't the first person to call me out, and you won't be the last. But I've always got the best intentions. I generally never reply. And, I'm not a foe. I probably want the swamp to drain more than Q does. I hate living in a rigged system.

Some of that dumb shite doesn't help. But many of the posters are great.

This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:06 pm
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
14960 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:56 pm to
If the liberal media will actively participate in the Smollett hoax, and they did, they will also participate in a hoax concerning Ginsberg.

The bitch is dead and there may be someone sitting in her place on the bench but it ain't her.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Keep LARP in the LARP thread

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

The former gets you categorized as a tinfoil wearing loon, who doesn't need evidence to make conclusions. The ladder gets you characterized as a reasonable person, who uses evidence, or lack there of, to question narratives, that he cannot prove wrong, but thinks there might be an issue.
Well said.
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

The bitch is dead and there may be someone sitting in her place on the bench but it ain't her.


It's possible, but it sounds crazy when you state it as fact, with the amount of information available to the public.

Don't go to the Q thread yet. There's enough of you there already.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39842 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:14 pm to
I honestly hoped she's still alive because this year is too early for the full tilt glorious melt to come to fruition.

It HAS to happen early next year so we get the full treatment of liberal melt about it can't happen in an election year.

Think about it:

- Replace lib with conservative.

- Replace during election year after the 2016 Scalia victory.

- Replace while Trump! is "under investigation", or "colluding colluding", or "trailing in polls", or "restarting the KKK", or "insert_melter_here".

Please, God, let me live through Jan 2021 at minimum. I love you. Thank you. Amen.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14409 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:23 pm to
Everybody knows she's a lefty on the court. Everybody expects her decisions/votes have a lefty tilt. My only beef with her recently was that she wasn't present to question/hear arguments in person. If she's present and participating in the case, I may not agree with her positions but she is active in each case.

Conservative or liberal, they need to be present and participating in the process. Interns and assistants should not be deciding cases, simply because they weren't run through the wringer of Senate approval.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Okay, so what's your problem with her doing an interview and removing all doubt?



The only people with doubts are on special little domestic terrorism watchlists/LARP threads.

Why bother?
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:36 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram