re: Rut Roh - Harry Sisson might be in a little trouble

quote:

---

His comments don't warrant a visit from anyone. He's parroting one of the scotus justices. And his comments are not a threat.

---

Specifically naming Trump is not parroting that insane dissent. He will get a visit.

Now he’s on there posting videos excited about the hawk tuah girl saying she’s not a Trump supporter. It makes sense that he’d be pumped to have her since he’s been hawk tuahing Biden’s pecker the past 4 years.

Thank you Mods for allowing said pussy description of said pussy to not be edited.

And here’s to immortalize Hawk Tuah Harry for the rest of his life for the single gayest tweet in the history of Twitter/X where he thinks refusing to blow a candidate means you don’t actually support them:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

no hesitation there. straight to the point.

Harry is a DNC paid social media influencer. Once it was discovered he was a paid shill, his reach dwindled. He has another little cuck sidekick that gets paid too.
They both paint Joe as nothing but gold.

He got wrecked in that Piers Morgan interview he did about the debate. he was going on about how great Biden was

That kid probably doesn't even know what hawk tuah means

quote:

---

Specifically naming Trump is not parroting that insane dissent. He will get a visit.

---

I don’t know if he will “get a visit” or not, but he should not. His comment is valid and it’s a very good point. Do we want our President able to commit treasonous crimes, like harass, threaten and harm his competition, and have immunity? Remember that the Democrats will have it and they are much more likely to use it for political purposes.

I think the ruling is basically correct because it chooses the lesser of two evils. If SCOTUS had ruled that Trump could be prosecuted for official acts then Presidents could be prosecuted willy-nilly in the future; they’ve all done something, as President, that is a “crime” to a prosecutor, judge and jury of the opposite political stripe.

Plus, we really don’t lose much deterrence with this ruling. It’s not fear of prosecution that prevented Trump from overthrowing the election; it was the other elected officials. And if we ever get to the point in which elected officials have so little integrity (we are close) that they will tolerate that, then we are lost anyway.