Started By
Message

re: Russian Interference in the election?

Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112734 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:23 pm to
Not to mention that this same group held anti-Trump rallies.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101667 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:24 pm to
If this was all the non-collusion stuff, I can't wait to see the shite they came up with they found some WILLING dupes in the campaign to actually go in with them. I'm on the edge of my seat now.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76703 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

When he's still handing down indictments 90 days from now

for whom? is he going to target Youtube next?


Russians are funding Infowars and Young Turks through wire fraud!

I demand an investigation!
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39575 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Not to mention that this same group held anti-Trump rallies


Whose activities date back to 2014, before Trump was a candidate.
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22434 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:26 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:28 pm to
i think the "collusion" is, at best, Trump/campaign member being told about the hacking...and then...profit?

but this stuff today kind of hurts that narrative, b/c it's clear that Russia was going 100mph with this stuff regardless of whether Trump participated. whether or not Trump knew about the hacked documents, Russia was clearly going to release them to hurt Hillary

i truly don't get how there is a real nexus of any magnitude anymore
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101667 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:29 pm to
In other words, there's really NO logic here that there's gonna be something else BIG.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

The investigation is not over but the "collusion" argument as it pertains to hacking the election is toast.
No. But I'd be interested in seeing you string together a cogent argument and make that case. Since you're so sure it should be a pretty simple exercise. I would caution that assuming that the collusion case is closed based upon paragraph 6 of this indictment requires you to make a number of assumptions you aren't in a position to make incl: 1. These 16 individuals/entities are the final indictments in the information ops line of inquiry and 2. There are no other suspected instances of Trump team-Russia coordination in the other lines of inquiry. So we're throwing out Flynn, Papadopoulous, the Trump tower meeting, the sharing of actual "hacked" information from the DNC and other intrusions, and whatever else might be revealed by the financial crimes line of the investigation (including Gates, Manafort, and other Trump-linked persons and entities).

And no one is saying the collusion piece is there. But saying it's been ruled out by today's indictments seems a bit silly, no?
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112734 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:31 pm to
I mean, they didn't reveal that they were Russian and "unwitting" is about a strong of a term as you can use. Collusion is done.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112734 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:32 pm to
Calm down

The language is there for you to read. Honest Bob and his team wrote it. A.) Russian hackers never revealed their identities
B.) "associated with the campaign" = "unwitting".

If you want to imagine more Russian boogeymen and talk about people who have already been indicted, feel free. If you have a problem with the special counsel, email Honest Bob.
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 1:34 pm
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101667 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:32 pm to
So, basically the theory is, there's something else out there, but we needed to get this out and moving now? Why? Is the bad shite you're suspecting completely different than with these folks? Was this just the Russian JV team?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:33 pm to
i don't get how Trump could have acted as a vehicle for this information, and that's what "collusion" would take

Russia has Podesta's emails
Russia tells Trump campaign they have the emails
then...what? they were released via Wikileaks, not Trump

Russia was already setting up this scheme in 2014, well before anyone had an inkling Trump may have had a shot in 2016

or...the "Russia had dirt on Trump" angle...

Russia has dirt on Trump
Russia influences Trump to...what, exactly? run for President?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Oh yeah, an incredible skill for a guy who’s literally living by the motto “ the internets is serious bidness”
I guess you missed the whole stolen identities and bank and wire fraud piece of the indictment. It's really an interesting read. I recommend it to you.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

. But I'd be interested in seeing you string together a cogent argument and make that case.

i'd love to hear you string together a cogent argument to explain how there was actual collusion greater than knowledge

Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112734 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:34 pm to
There could be more teams out there!
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19109 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:34 pm to
They indicted Russians for what you do here every day, trolling their asses off. Better hope honest Bob doesn’t take a peek at your post history.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112734 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:34 pm to
Navy is emotional right now. Asking me to make the argument when the language is Honest Bob's
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:35 pm to
i'm assuming that fact

but what could Trump have actively done to collude with Russia?

these indictments remove the "social media cyber attack" angle from Trump's campaign entirely

so there is what, the hacked emails? that Trump didn't release?
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112734 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:37 pm to
The social media / hacking / dividing the country angle has been the narrative the whole time. Now that's gone and we're the ridiculous ones for not imagining more Russians?
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 1:37 pm
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

So, basically the theory is, there's something else out there, but we needed to get this out and moving now? Why? Is the bad shite you're suspecting completely different than with these folks? Was this just the Russian JV team?
I think I see the issue. You guys think this case should unfold like the plot of a novel or a film. There should be a rhythm and the sexiest or most interesting parts should be revealed on a schedule and at a pace that makes sense and keeps an audience captive.

That's not how it works. They indicted these guys when they felt the case to indict was strong enough and when doing so wouldn't undermine or complicate some other part of the investigation. If there was any calculation, it would probably be just to show the public that a lot of work is being done behind the scenes. That indictment has a lot of information in it that represents thousands and thousands of man-hours. I really would recommend that people check it out.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram