- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/13/23 at 11:33 pm to Indefatigable
Frail an adjective to the extant phrase of "frail (minded), weak minded"
to mock others like a middle schooler about their "love for Vlad Putin" just because you are a warmonger, and filled with bloodlust.
Your understanding of the geopolitics of what has been done to Russia by evil Americans is the continuing thread.
to mock others like a middle schooler about their "love for Vlad Putin" just because you are a warmonger, and filled with bloodlust.
Your understanding of the geopolitics of what has been done to Russia by evil Americans is the continuing thread.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 6:33 am to Indefatigable
quote:That about sums it up.
I’m frail because I don’t think
quote:Since TTBOMK Moscow's only statement is they possess the weapon, I suppose its existence is what you're calling to question.
Says the person who buys into fearmongering over Russian tsunami-nukes...
But now that I think about it, Moscow has stated those things so I’m sure you bought it lock, stock and barrel. After all, anything Moscow says is total truth to NC_Tigah.
So here's a non-Moscow assessment of the weapon and its capability. This has been posted before of course. But since you've chosen to be exceedingly stupid here, I'll post it in picture form to aid with your comprehension.
Welcome to 5yrs ago
Posted on 1/14/23 at 7:11 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
NC_Tigah
What do you predict Russia would do next after capturing Ukraine?
Posted on 1/14/23 at 7:14 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Three more days and they will be in Kiev, world's greatest army
We’ve been hearing this since April.
Where the hell has CT been all this time
Posted on 1/14/23 at 7:38 am to NC_Tigah
I haven’t denied it’s existence. I’m denying that there is any risk of nuclear escalation in this current conflict.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 7:55 am to Indefatigable
This is basically the poliboard vs the O-T, switching sides everyday.

Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:16 am to 4cubbies
quote:Well that clearly isn't happening. Russia has a hell of a mess on its hands. Their goal to gain a teritorial buffer strip along their western border seems to be in the toilet.
after capturing Ukraine?
The confounding variable is air superiority, or lack of it. Without it, I think Russia gains what they can in the Donbass and southern Dnieper/Canal region and calls it a day.
The question in the aftermath is what NATO does.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:52 am to 4cubbies
quote:
What do you predict Russia would do next after capturing Ukraine?
Why does everyone think Russia is just going to start rolling into NATO countries next?
Talk about a huge mistake.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 11:04 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Well that clearly isn't happening. Russia has a hell of a mess on its hands.
Well let’s say they did easily capture Ukraine. What was their long term goal? I’m still confused about their motivation for the invasion.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 11:28 am to NC_Tigah
The Wagner group is using human wave attacks. Very costly in terms of lives. Reminds me of Soviet WWII tactics of sending a big wave of troops through mine fields.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 12:20 pm to 4cubbies
quote:So are others on this board.
I’m still confused about their motivation for the invasion.
---
• Russia views NATO as its enemy (with some justification)
• Invasions of Russia by enemies have been extremely costly to Russia. Each came through Ukraine which took time, and allowed Russia to defend itself.
• The WWII German invasion cost the USSR 23 million lives. That's about 10,000-fold US deaths at Pearl Harbor. Sort of a perspective-setter.
• Now NATO wants into Ukraine, and Ukraine wants to play pattycake with NATO.
• Russia considers NATO in Ukraine a threat to its national security.
• Nonetheless, Biden and Zelensky renewed very public Ukraine-to-NATO discussions.
• Rather than allow Ukraine-to-NATO, Russia invaded, likely with hopes of securing a wide swath of eastern Ukraine as a vassal buffer between Ukraine-NATO and Russia. That didn't work out. So no we have a stalemate with Russia far short of its objectives, but occupying extensive Ukrainian territory nonetheless.
Popular
Back to top

0








