- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:48 pm to WDE24
quote:
I assume one of Rudy’s affirmative defenses will be asserting truth. To succeed on that affirmative defense, he will have to prove they are true.
Dominion will have to show which statements Rudy made were false, and prove that.
Rudy can certainly defend himself by proving his statements true, but the burden is Dominion's. Not Rudy's.
So, maybe a statement made by Rudy is inconclusive. If Dominion cannot show it false, Rudy is not liable.
This post was edited on 1/25/21 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:48 pm to CaTiger85
quote:It is exactly what he said.
Yeesh. Is that what you think he said?
This post was edited on 1/25/21 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:48 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
nutjob witnesses.
Why do you call them nut jobs? Outside of being a far leftist, what basis do you have for this comment?
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:50 pm to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:
If he loses or settles, will you still believe dominion machines flipped votes?
Settled? No...I'd think Dominion was never wrong and Rudy et al had been talking out of their asses.
Loses? Not necessarily.
Do you think this guy did not kill his wife?
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:50 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
That's a swing and a miss.
If you were a lawyer you could find at least one thing that would give grounds for a countersuit.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:51 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
If you were a lawyer you could find at least one thing that would give grounds for a countersuit.
True. It wouldn't be on constitutional grounds, though.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:52 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Agree. They are timing these lawsuits in a way to define the exact lawyer client relationships.
Interesting point.
Bet they get consolidated.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:52 pm to nitwit
quote:
when a defendant in a defamation suit threatens to investigate whether his slanders are actually true, he is acknowledging that he has a big problem.
That is literally the first step in every defamation suit. Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:57 pm to WDE24
quote:
It is exactly what he said.
Yikes.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:58 pm to CaTiger85
Feel free to break it down, unless you are uncomfortable with more than drive by quips.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:00 pm to JudgeHolden
You're a blowhard and a phony. Folks should save your pontifications and predictions just to show how wrong you actually are; which is most of the time.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:00 pm to Jjdoc
Scare tactic by Dominion to have unbridled power. Scary if they did have uncontested power, with no one allowed to audit them. Hello Big Brother.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:04 pm to WDE24
quote:
I assume one of Rudy’s affirmative defenses will be asserting truth. To succeed on that affirmative defense, he will have to prove they are true.
In order to establish his defense, I suppose the court will have to allow Rudy to crack open the machines in the footprint, as Wednesday called it.
We’re right back to Kracken. Y’all laughed. I’m stoked.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:05 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
Why do you call them nut jobs?
He’s a leftist and that’s the default amount of respect he gives his fellow citizens.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:07 pm to WDE24
quote:
He said the amount asked for is an act of intimidation to wipe out and censor free speech and the ability of lawyers to vigorously represent their clients and that he is going to explore a counter suit for those constitutional violations.
Didn't the media outlets sued by Wood in the Sandman case pretty much say the same thing about the amount asked for with regard to freedom of the press/speech. But hey its the media so frick'em right.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:07 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:He will certainly be able to engage in discovery. Analyzing machines by experts could very well be a part of that process.
, I suppose the court will have to allow Rudy to crack open the machines in the footprint,
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:07 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
It wouldn't be on constitutional grounds, though.
Are Constitutional grounds reserved for the government/criminal trials?
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:09 pm to Jjdoc
Dominion has already had months to destroy evidence.
Discovery, at this point, is redundant and fruitless.
Discovery, at this point, is redundant and fruitless.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 1:10 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
Yeesh. Is that what you think he said?
Yes. It is. Now try No Standing vs Evidence heard in Trail. He thinks it's the same.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News